Response of ecosystem services to land use change in county scale of Fengqiu, Henan Province, China

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 9015-9022

  Qindong, Fan ^a   Shengyan, Ding ^a  

^a NONE   (China)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services (ES); Improved Markov model; Land use change

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; LAND TYPE; LAND USE CHANGE; MAPPING METHOD; MARKOV CHAIN; NUMERICAL MODEL; POPULATION GROWTH; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TREND ANALYSIS;

CHINA; FENGQIU; HENAN;

EID: 84945458107     PISSN: 18667511     EISSN: 18667538     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-1846-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bekele EG, Nicklow JW (2005) Multiobjective management of ecosystem services by integrative watershed modeling and evolutionary algorithms. Water Resour Res 41(10), W10406
2. Bryan BA (2013) Incentives, land use, and ecosystem services: synthesizing complex linkages. Environ Sci Pol 27:124–134
3. Chung KL, Walsh JB (2005) Markov processes, Brownian motion, and time symmetry, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 130–175
4. Costanza R, d’Arge R, Groot RD, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Sutton P, van den Belt B (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630):253–260
5. Feng YB, He CY, Yang QY, He J (2014) Evaluation of ecological effect in land use planning using ecosystem service value method. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 30(9):201–211
6. Hu HB, Liu WJ, Cao M (2008) Impact of land use and land cover changes on ecosystem services in Menglun, Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Environ Monit Assess 146(1–3):147–156
7. Jacobs–Crisioni C, Rietveld P, Koomen E (2014) The impact of spatial aggregation on urban development analyses. Appl Geogr 47:46–56
8. Kopmann A, Rehdanz K (2013) A human well-being approach for assessing the value of natural land areas. Ecol Econ 93:20–33
9. Kreuter UP, Harris HG, Matlock MD, Lacey RE (2001) Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecol Econ 39(3):333–346
10. Krishnaswamy J, Bawa KS, Ganeshaiah KN, Kiran MC (2009) Quantifying and mapping biodiversity and ecosystem services: utility of a multi-season NDVI based Mahalanobis distance surrogate. Remote Sens Environ 113(4):857–867
11. Lautenbach S, Kugel C, Lausch A, Seppelt R (2011) Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol Indic 11(2):676–687
12. Li R, Dong M, Cui J, Zhang L, Cui Q, He W (2007) Quantification of the impact of land-use changes on ecosystem services: a case study in Pingbian County, China. Environ Monit Assess 128(1–3):503–510
13. Logsdon RA, Chaubey I (2013) A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecol Model 257:57–65
14. Luo P, Jiang RR, Li HG, Zhang XX, Huang B, Xiang Q (2010) Research on the method of regional land use evolution based on the combination of spatial logistic model and Markov model. China Land Sci 24(1):31–36
15. Luo D, Zhang W (2013) A comparison of Markov model-based methods for predicting the ecosystem service value of land use in Wuhan, central China. Ecosyst Serv. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.001i
16. Mao CB, Chen Y (2010) The driving force and prediction of the evolution of land use and ecosystem services value: a case study of Jiangsu province. Res Soil Water Conserv 17(4):269–275
17. Mitsova D, Shuster W, Wang X (2011) A cellular automata model of land cover change to integrate urban growth with open space conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 99:141–153
18. Nahuelhual L, Carmona A, Aguayo M, Echeverria C (2013) Land use change and ecosystem services provision: a case study of recreation and ecotourism opportunities in southern Chile. Landsc Ecol 29(2):329–344
19. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S (2011) A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol 48(3):630–636
20. Tallis H, Polasky S (2009) ing and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural‐resource management. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1162(1):265–283
21. Villa F, Ceroni M, Bagstad K, Johnson G, Krivov S (2009) ARIES (Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services): a new tool for ecosystem services assessment, planning and valuation. In: 11th Annual BIOECON conference on economic instruments to enhance the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity
22. Willaarts BA, Volk M, Aguilera PA (2012) Assessing the ecosystem services supplied by freshwater flows in Mediterranean agro-ecosystems. Agric Water Manag 105:21–31
23. Xie GD, Xiao Y, Zhen L, Lu CX (2005) Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chin J Eco–Agric 13(3):10–13
24. Zhang ZH, Yang YC, Xie P, Zhao SS, Lin SJ, Bao GD, Zhang DW, Li Y (2014) Dynamic variation of landscape pattern of land use in Songyuan City in nearly 20 years. Chin Agric Sci Bull 30(2):222–226
25. Zhao J, Han XF, Tian HW (2011) Research on the variation of the usage of land and environmental effects in BaoTou. J Anhui Agric Sci 39(4):2402–2405