A bibliometric assessment of scientific productivity and international collaboration of the Islamic World in science and technology (S&T) areas

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1059-1077

  Sarwar, Raheem ^a   Hassan, Saeed UI ^a  

^a INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; International collaborations; Islamic World; Scientific research productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945458078     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1718-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abdullah, A., & Wee, M. C. (2011). Malaysia’s computer science research productivity based on publications in the Web of Science, 2000–2010. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,16(1), 109–124.
2. Beaver, D. D. (2011). Reflections on scientific collaboration. Scientometrics,52(3), 365–377.
3. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3–72.
4. Carey, B. (2014). Stanford University News. Accessed from April 9, 2015, from http://news.stanford.edu/news/2014/august/fields-medal-mirzakhani-081214.html.
5. Erfanmanesh, M., Rohani, V. A., & Abrizah, A. (2012). Co-authorship network of scientometrics research collaboration. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,17(3), 73–93.
6. Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics,51(2), 415–427.
7. Ghobadian, B., Najafi, G., Rahimi, H., & Yusaf, T. F. (2009). Future of renewable energies in Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,13(3), 689–695.
8. Guan, J., & Ma, N. (2007). A bibliometric study of China’s semiconductor literature compared with other major Asian countries. Scientometrics,70(1), 107–124.
9. Jung, J. (2012). International research collaboration among academics in China and South Korea. International Journal of Chinese Education,1(2), 235–254.
10. Kumar, S., & Jan, J. M. (2014). Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: Comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of ‘Energy Fuels’, 2009–2011. Scientometrics,98(1), 387–414.
11. McClellan, J. E. (2003). Specialist control: The publications committee of the Académie Royale Des Sciences (Paris) 1700–1793. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 93(3), 101–134.
12. Mishra, P. N., Panda, K. C., & Goswami, N. G. (2010). Citation analysis and research impact of National Metallurgical Laboratory, India during 1972–2007: A case study. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science,15(1), 91–113.
13. Moed, H. F. (2002). Measuring China’s research performance using the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics,53(3), 281–296.
14. Moin, M., Mahmoudi, M., & Rezaei, N. (2005). Scientific output of Iran at the threshold of the 21st century. Scientometrics,62(2), 239–248.
15. Nabil, M. D., & Kenan, B. (2014). Education and scientific development in OIC countries. Retrieved April 11, 2015, from http://www.sesric.org/publications-detail.php?id=263.
16. Narin, F., & Frame, J. D. (1989). The growth of Japanese science and technology. Science,245(4918), 600–600.
17. Ong, H. C., Mahlia, T. M. I., & Masjuki, H. H. (2011). A review on energy scenario and sustainable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,15(1), 639–647.
18. Rinia, E. J., Van Leeuwen, T. N., Van Vuren, H. G., & Van Raan, A. F. (1998). Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands. Research Policy,27(1), 95–107.
19. Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations. Global scientific collaboration in the 21st. London, RS policy document 03/11, London.
20. Salton, G., & Bergmark, D. (1979). A citation study of computer science literature. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,3, 393–440.
21. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics,9(5–6), 281–291.
22. Sharma, S., & Thomas, V. J. (2008). Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis. Scientometrics,76(3), 483–501.
23. Van Raan, A. F., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (2002). Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research. Research Policy,31(4), 611–632.
24. Zewail, A. H, Adams, J., Hook, D., & King, C. (2011). Global research report of middle east exploring the changing landscape of ARABIAN, PERSIAN AND TURKISH RESEARCH. Thomson Reuters. Accessed March 11, 2011 from http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/globalresearchreport-aptme.pdf.