Design of customized web applications with OntoWeaver

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 54-61

  Lei, Yuangui ^a   Motta, Enrico ^a   Domingue, John ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Customization Modelling; Web Site Design; Web Site Modelling

Indexed keywords

ONTOLOGY; WEBSITES; XML;

CONCEPTUAL LEVELS; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; ONTOLOGY-BASED; SITE MODELING; USER MODELING; WEB APPLICATION; WEB SITE DESIGN;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 84945309062     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/945645.945656     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter. Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt.
2. P. Brusilovsky, Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction, 1996, v6, n2-3, pp 87-129.
3. S. Ceri, P. Fraterali, S. Paraboschi, Data-Driven One- To-One Web Site Generation for Data-Intensive Applications. Proceedings of the 25th VLDB Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999, pp. 615-626.
4. S. Ceri, P. Fratenali, A. Bongio, Web Modelling Language (WebML): a modelling language for designing Web sites. WWW9 Conference, May 2000.
5. F. Frasincar, G. J. Houben, Hypermedia Presentation Adaptation on the Semantic Web. Second International Conference, AH2002, Malaga, Spain, pp. 133-142.
6. Horrocks et al., DAML+OIL, http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index, 2001.
7. E. Friedman-Hill, Jess, http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/.
8. Y. Jin, S. Decker, G. Wiederhold, OntoWebber: Model- Driven Ontology-Based Web Site Management. The 1st International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS'01), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, July 29-Aug 1, 2001.
9. G. Kappel, B. Pröll, W. Retschitzegger, W. Schwinger, Modeling Ubiquitous Web Applications - The WUML Approach, International Workshop on Data Semantics in Web Information Systems (DASWIS-2001), Yokohama, Japan, November 27-30, 2001.
10. G. Kappel, W. Retschitzegger, E. Kimmerstorfer, B. Proll, W. Schwinger, and TH. Hofer, Towards a Generic Customization Model for Ubiquitous Web Applications. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web Oriented Software Technology, 2002, pp. 79-104.
11. A. Kobsa, J. Koenemann and W. Pohl, Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Online Customer Relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review 16(2), 2001, pp.111-155.
12. Y. Lei, E. Motta and J. Domingue, An Ontology-Driven Approach to Web Site Generation and Maintenance. In proceedings of 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management, Sigüenza, 2002, pp. 219-234.
13. U. Manber, A. Patel, and J. Robison, Experience with Personalization on Yahoo!. in Communications of the ACM, August 2000, Pages: 35-39.
14. J. Mostafa, Guest Editor's Introduction: Information Customization. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(6), 2002, pp.8-11.
15. M. Perkowitz, O. Etzioni, Towards adaptive Web sites: Conceptual framework and case study. Artificial Intelligence 118 (2000), pp. 245-275.
16. G. Rossi, D. Schwabe, R. Guimarães, Designing personalized web applications. WWW 2001: 275-284.
17. D. Schwabe, R. M. Guimaraes, G. Rossi, Cohesive design of personalized Web applications,. IEEE Internet Computing, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, March-April 2002, pp. 34-43.
18. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Schema Specification 1.0, W3C Candidate Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
19. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax, W3C Proposed Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/PR-rdf-syntax/.
20. OWL Web Ontology Language, W3C Working Draft, March 2003, http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-owlfeatures- 20030331/.