Standards and coordination in open source software

Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, SIIT 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 85-97

  Egyedi, T M ^a   Van Wendel De Joode, R ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Companies; Licenses; Linux; Motion pictures; Open source software; Operating systems; Software engineering; Software maintenance; Software standards

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; INDUSTRY; LINUX; MOTION PICTURES; OPEN SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STANDARDIZATION; STANDARDS;

COMPLEMENTARY RELATION; LICENSES; SOFTWARE STANDARDS; SOURCE CODES;

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

EID: 84945298755     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2003.1251198     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Benkler, Y. (2002). Cease's Penguin, or, Linux and the Nature of the Firm. Yale Law Journal, 4 (3).
2. Bonaccorsi, A. & C. Rossi (2003). Why Open Source Software can succeed. Research Policy, 32 (7), 1243-1258.
3. Broersma, M. (2002). Linux standard gets the go-ahead. zdnet.com.com. 2 juli 2002.
4. Dalle, J.-M. & N. Jullien (2003). 'Libre' software: turning fads into institutions?, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/dalle2.pdf, working paper.
5. Egyedi, T.M. (2000). 'Compatibility Strategies in Licensing, Open Sourcing and Standardisation: The case of Java™, In:H. Coenen, M.J. Holler & E. Niskanen (Eds.), 5th Helsinki Workshop on Standardization and Networks, 13-14 August 2000. Government Institute for Economic Research, Helsinki, VATT-Discussion Papers 243, pp. 5-34.
6. Egyedi, T. (2002a). 'Strategies for de facto compatibility: Standardization, proprietary and open source approaches to Java', Knowledge, Technology, and Policy, 14(2), pp.113-128.
7. Egyedi, T. (2002b). 'Tension between OSS-divergence and user needs for interoperability'. Contribution to the Workshop Advancing the Research Agenda on Free/Open Source Software, October 14, 2002, European Commission, Avenue de Beaulieu 33, 1160 Brussels, Belgium. http://www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/workshop/papers.htm
8. Egyedi, T.M. (2002c). Trendrapport Standaardisatie. Oplossingsrichtingen voor problemen van IT-interoperabiliteit. Delft: Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat/ Meetkundige Dienst, 25 September 2002.
9. Egyedi, T.M. & J. Hudson (2001). 'Maintaining the Integrity of Standards: The Java Case', in:K. Dittrich & T.M. Egyedi (Eds.), Standards Compatibility and Infrastructure Development: Proceedings of the 6th EURAS Workshop, 28-29 June 2001, Delft, The Netherlands, 83-98.
10. Farrell & G. Saloner (1986). Installed base and compatibility: innovation, product preannouncements and predation. American Economic Review, 76, 940-955.
11. Hippel, E. v. (2001). Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open-Source Software, Sloan Management Review, 42 (4), 82-86.
12. Katz, M. & C. Shapiro, (1985). "Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility," American Economic Review, 75 (3), 424-440.
13. Liebowitz, S. J. & Stephen E. Margolis (1998). Network Externalities (Effects), http://www.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/palgrave/network.html, 02-Nov-1998
14. Lerner, J. and J. Tirole (2002) Some simple economics of open source, Journal of Industrial Economics, 50 (2), 197-234.
15. Ljungberg, J. (2000) Open source movements as a model for organising, European Journal of Information Systems, 9 (4), 208-216.
16. Markus, M. L., B. Manville & C. E. Agres (2000) What Makes a Virtual Organization Work?, Sloan Management Review, 42 (1), 13-26.
17. McGowan, D. & M.A. Lemley (1998). 'Could Java change everything? The Competitive Propriety of a Proprietary standard', Antitrust Bulletin, 43, 715 a.f..
18. McGowan, D. (2001) Legal Implications of Open-Source Software, University of Illinois Review, 241 (1) 241-304.
19. McGowan, D. (2002) Developing a research agenda for open-source licensing practices, in NSF Workshop on Open-Source Software, Arlington, Virginia.
20. O'Mahony, S. C. (2003) How Community Managed Software Projects Protect Their Work, Research Policy, (Special Issue on Open Source Software Development).
21. Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons; The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, The political economy of institutions and decisions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
22. Perens, B. (1999) The Open Source Definition, in OpenSources Voices from the Open Source Revolution, DiBona, C., S. Ockman and M. Stone (Eds) O'Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol, pp. 171-189.
23. Selz, D. (1999) Value Webs, Emerging forms of fluid and flexible organizations, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, pp. 15-59.
24. Schmidt, S.K. & R. Werle (1991) The Development of Compatibility Standards in Telecommunications: Conceptual Framework and Theoretical Perspective. Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gesellschaftsforschung, Koln, 1991.
25. Schmidt, S.K. & R. Werle (1992). Technical Discourse in International Standardization. Paper presented at 4S/EASST, Goteborg, August 12-15, 1992.
26. Schmidt, S.K. & R. Werle (1998). Co-ordinating Technology. Studies in the International Standardization of Telecommunications. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
27. Van Wendel de Joode, R., J. A. De Bruijn & M. J. G. Van Eeten (2003) PROTECTING THE VIRTUAL COMMONS; Self-organizing open source communities and innovative intellectual property regimes, Information Technology & Law Series, T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, In Press.
28. Von Hippel, E. & G. Von Krogh (2002) Exploring the Open Source Software Phenomenon: Issues for Organization Science, opensource.mit.edu/papers/removehippelkrogh.pdf, working paper.
29. Wayner, P. (2000) FREE FOR ALL: How Linux and the Free Software Movement Undercut the High-Tech Titans, HarperBusiness, New York.
30. Wegberg, M. van & P. Berends (2000a) Competing communities of users and developers of computer software: competition between open source software and commercial software. Extract published as Van Wegberg & Berends (2000b)
31. Wegberg, M. van & P. Berends (2000b) The Open Source Code Movement: the Linux operating System, in:Sandra Schruijer (ed.) Multi-organizational Partnerships and Cooperative Strategy, Dutch University Press, Chapter 46: 283-287; presentations of the Sixth International Conference on Multi-Organizational Partnerships and Cooperative Strategy, WORC, Tilburg University, July 1999.