A proposal for a formal OCL semantics in isabelle/HOL

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2410, Issue , 2002, Pages 99-114

  Brucker, Achim D ^a   Wolff, Burkhart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Isabelle; OCL; Shallow embedding; Testing; UML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FORMAL LOGIC; FORMAL METHODS; SEMANTICS; TESTING;

ISABELLE; OBJECT CONSTRAINT LANGUAGE; OCL; OCL SPECIFICATIONS; SHALLOW EMBEDDING; STANDARDIZATION PROCESS; TEST CASE GENERATION; UML;

THEOREM PROVING;

EID: 84945287382     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45685-6_8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Manfred Broy, Christian Facchi, Radu Grosu, Rudi Hettler, Heinrich Hussmann, Dieter Nazareth, Oscar Slotosch, Franz Regensburger, and Ketil St0len. The requirement and design specification language Spectrum, an informal introduction (V 1.0). Technical Report TUM-I9312, TU Munchen, 1993.
2. Achim D. Brucker and Burkhart Wolff. A note on design decisions of a formalization of the OCL. Technical Report 168, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitat Freiburg, 2002.
3. Jeremy Dick and Alain Faivre. Automating the generation and sequencing of test cases from model-based specications. In J.C.P. Woodcock and P.G. Larsen, editors, FME'93: Industrial-Strength Formal Methods, volume 670 of LNCS, pages 268-284. Springer, 1993.
4. Reiner Hahnle. Automated Deduction in Multiple-valued Logics. OxfordUniversity Press, 1994.
5. Cliff B. Jones. Systematic Software Development Using VDM. Prentice Hall, 1990.
6. Cris Kobryn. Will UML 2.0 be agile or awkward? CACM, 45(1):107-110, 2002.
7. Luis Mandel and Maria Victoria Cengarle. On the expressive power of OCL. FM'99, 1999.
8. Luis Mandel and Maria Victoria Cengarle. A formal semantics for OCL 1.4. In C. Kobryn M. Gogolla, editor, UML 2001: The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages, Concepts, and Tools, volume 2185 of LNCS, Toronto, 2001. Springer.
9. Wolfgang Naraschewski and Markus Wenzel. Object-oriented verification based on record subtyping in Higher-Order Logic. In J. Grundy and M. Newey, editors, Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, volume 1479 of LNCS, pages 349-366. Springer, 1998.
10. Tobias Nipkow, David von Oheimb, and Cornelia Pusch. /Java: Embedding a programming language in a theorem prover. In Friedrich L. Bauer and Ralf Steinbruggen, editors, Foundations of Secure Computation, volume 175 of NATO Science Series F: Computer and Systems Sciences, pages 117-144. IOS Press, 2000.
11. N. D. North. Automatic test generation for the triangle problem. Technical Report DITC 161/90, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, 1990.
12. OMG. Object Constraint Language Specification. [13], chapter 6.
13. OMG. Unified Modeling Language Specification (Version 1.4). 2001.
14. Mark Richters and Martin Gogolla. On Formalizing the UML Object Constraint Language OCL. In Tok-Wang Ling, Sudha Ram, and Mong Li Lee, editors, Proc. 17th Int. Conf. Conceptual Modeling (ER'98), volume 1507 of LNCS, pages 449-464. Springer, 1998.
15. Thomas Santen. A Mechanized Logical Model of Z and Object-Oriented Specification. PhDthesis, Technical University Berlin, 1999.
16. J. M. Spivey. The Z Notation: A Reference Manual. Prentice Hall, 1992.
17. Jos Warmer and Anneke Kleppe. The Object Contraint Language: Precise Modelling with UML. Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, USA, 1999.
18. Jos Warmer, Anneke Kleppe, Tony Clark, Anders Ivner, Jonas Hogstrom, Martin Gogolla, Mark Richters, Heinrich Hussmann, Steffen Zschaler, Simon Johnston, David S. Frankel, and Conrad Bock. Response to the UML 2.0 OCL RfP. Technical report, 2001.
19. Glynn Winskel. The Formal Semantics of Programming Languages. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.