Experiences, utilisation and outcomes of maternity care in England among women from different socio-economic groups: Findings from the 2010 National Maternity Survey

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 122, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1610-1617

  Lindquist, A ^a,b   Kurinczuk, J J ^a   Redshaw, M ^a   Knight, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTHERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Index of multiple deprivation; maternity care; socio economic; UK

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HELP SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POSTNATAL CARE; PRENATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED KINGDOM; ADULT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH DISPARITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION SEEKING; MIDWIFE; MINORITY GROUP; NEWBORN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL CLASS; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CESAREAN SECTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDWIFERY; MINORITY GROUPS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMEN; PRENATAL CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; SOCIAL CLASS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84945286207     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13059     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Marmot M, Davey Smith G,. Socioeconomic differentials in health. J Health Psychol 1997; 2: 283-96.
2. Department of Health. Healthy People, Healthy Lives: Our Strategy for Public Health in England. London: Department of Health; 2010.
3. National Audit Office. Tackling Inequalities in Life Expectancy in Areas with the Worst Health and Deprivation. London: National Audit Office; 2010.
4. Manning D, Brewster B, Bundred P,. Social deprivation and admission for neonatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F337-8.
5. Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Dorling JS, Field DS,. Socioeconomic inequalities in very preterm birth rates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F11-14.
6. Smith LK, Draper ES, Manktelow BN, Field DJ,. Socioeconomic inequalities in survival and provision of neonatal care: population based study of very preterm infants. BMJ 2009; 339: b4702.
7. Lindquist A, Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ,. Variation in severe maternal morbidity according to socioeconomic position: a UK national case-control study. BMJ Open 2013; 3.
8. Lindquist A, Noor N, Sullivan E, Knight M,. The impact of socioeconomic position on severe maternal morbidity outcomes amongst women in Australia: a national case-control study. BJOG 2014; 122: 1601-9.
9. Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C,. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ 2001; 322: 1089-93; discussion 93-4.
10. Raleigh VS, Hussey D, Seccombe I, Hallt K,. Ethnic and social inequalities in women's experience of maternity care in England: results of a national survey. J R Soc Med 2010; 103: 188-98.
11. Redshaw M, Heikkila K,. Delivered with Care: A National Survey of Women's Experience of Maternity Care 2010. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2010.
12. Office for National Statistics. 2001 Census. 2001. [ www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/census/census-2001/index.html ]. Accessed 8 January 2013.
13. UK Department for Communities and Government. Measuring Multiple Deprivation at the Small Area Level: The Conceptual Framework. London: UK Department for Communities and Government; 2010.
14. Noble MWG, Smith G, Dibben C,. Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level. Environment and Planning A 2006; 38: 169-85.
15. Office for National Statistics. Live Births in England and Wales by Characteristics of Mother 2010. London: Office for National Statistics; 2011.
16. Office for National Statistics. Births in England and Wales by Parents' Country of Birth, 2010. London: Office for National Statistics; 2011.
17. Yelland JS, Sutherland GA, Brown SJ,. Women's experience of discrimination in Australian perinatal care: the double disadvantage of social adversity and unequal care. Birth 2012; 39: 211-20.
18. Pattenden S, Dolk H, Vrijheid M,. Inequalities in low birth weight: parental social class, area deprivation, and "lone mother" status. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 355-8.
19. Spencer N, Bambang S, Logan S, Gill L,. Socioeconomic status and birth weight: comparison of an area-based measure with the Registrar General's social class. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53: 495-8.
20. Rowe RE, Magee H, Quigley MA, Heron P, Askham J, Brocklehurst P,. Social and ethnic differences in attendance for antenatal care in England. Public Health 2008; 122: 1363-72.
21. Lewis G,. Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. BJOG 2011; 118 (Supp 1): 1-203.
22. Fairley L, Dundas R, Leyland AH,. The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 330.
23. Smith GC, Cordeaux Y, White IR, Pasupathy D, Missfelder-Lobos H, Pell JP, et al., The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e144.
24. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. CG110 Pregnancy and Complex Social Factors: NICE Guideline. London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2010 [updated October 2012]. [ http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG110/NICEGuidance/pdf/English ]. Accessed 18 June 2014.