Implementation issues in product line scoping

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1844, Issue , 2000, Pages 170-189

  Schmid, Klaus ^a   Gacek, Cristina ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REUSABILITY; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ABSTRACT LEVELS; ECONOMIC ASPECTS; IMPLEMENTATION ASPECTS; INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS; PRODUCT LINE ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES; STRONG INTERACTION; WATERFALL MODEL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 84945278816     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-44995-9_11     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Reuse-Driven Software Processes Guidebook, Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation, Technical Report SPC-92019-CMC, 1993.
2. Organization Domain Modeling (ODM) Guidebook, Version 2.0, Software Technology for Adaptable, Reliable Systems (STARS), Technical Report STARS-VC-A025/001/00, 1996.
3. J. Bayer, O. Flege, P. Knauber, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, K. Schmid, T. Widen, and J.-M. DeBaud. “PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines,” in Proceedings of Symposium on Software Reusability’99 (SSR’99), May 1999.
4. J.-M. DeBaud and K. Schmid. “A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 99), 1999.
5. Department of Defense - Software Reuse Initiative, Domain Scoping Framework, Version 3.1, Volume2, Technical Description, 1995.
6. J.M. DeBaud and J.F. Girard. “The Relation between the Product Line Development Entry Points and Reengineering,” in Proc. of Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architecture for Product Families, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Feb. 1998.
7. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice, Addison Wesley, 1998.
8. Reuse Adoption Guidebook, Software Productivity Consortium Services Corporation, 1993.
9. J. Poulin. Measuring Software Reuse. Addison Wesley, 1997.
10. M. Shaw and P. Clements. “A Field Guide to Boxology: Preliminary Classification of Architectural Styles for Software Systems,” in Proceedings of COMPSAC 1997, Washington, DC, August 1997.
11. C. Krueger. “Software Reuse,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 24, no.2, June 1992, pp. 131-183.
12. J.M. DeBaud. The Construction of Software Systems using Domain-Specific Reuse Infrastructures, Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA, 1996.
13. Ivar Jacobson, Martin Griss, and Patrik Jonsson. Software Reuse: Architecture Process and Organization for Business Success. ACM Press, 1997.
14. Andreas Birk, Felix Kröschel. A Knowledge Management Lifecycle for Experience Packages on Software Engineering Technologies. IESE-Report No. 007.99/E, February, 1999.
15. D. Perry. “Generic Architecture Descriptions for Product Lines,” in Proceedings of Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architecture for Product Families, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Feb. 1998, pp 51-56.
16. J. Bayer, O. Flege, and C. Gacek. “Creating Product Line Architectures,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software Architectures for Product Families (IWSAPF-3), March, 2000.
17. J. Bayer, C. Gacek, D. Muthig, and T. Widen. “PuLSE-I: Deriving Instances from a Product Line Infrastructure,” to appear in Proceedings of the 7th Annual IEEE International Conference on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS), April 2000.
18. J. Bayer, O. Flege, P. Knauber, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, K. Schmid and T. Widen. PuLSETM — Product Line Software Engineering. Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering. IESE-Report No. 020.99/E, 1999.
19. J. Bayer, J.-F. Girard, M. Würthner, J.-M. DeBaud, M. Apel, “Transitioning Legacy Assets to a Product Line Architecture,” in Proceedings of 7th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC)/7th ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE), 1999.
20. C. Gacek. Detecting Architectural Mismatches During System Composition, Ph.D. Dissertation, Center for Software Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0781, USA, 1998.
21. R. Kazman, M. Barbacci, M. Klein, S.J. Carriere, and S.G. Woods. “Experience with Performing Architecture Tradeoff Analysis,” in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 99), 1999, pp. 54-63.
22. R. Balzer. “An Architectural Infrastructure for Product Families,” in Proceedings of Workshop on Development and Evolution of Software Architecture for Product Families, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Feb. 1998, pp.158-160.
23. K.D. Althoff, A. Birk, S. Hartkopf, W. Müller, M. Nick, D. Surmann, and C. Tautz. “Managing Software Engineering Experience for Comprehensive Reuse,” in Proceedings of the 11th Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering Conference (SEKE 11), 1999, pp. 10-19.