The highs and lows of dispersal: How connectivity and initial population size jointly shape establishment dynamics in discrete landscapes

Oikos

Volumn 125, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 769-777

  Morel Journel, Thibaut ^a   Girod, Pierre ^a   Mailleret, Ludovic ^a,b   Auguste, Alexandra ^a   Blin, Aurélie ^a   Vercken, Elodie ^a  

^a Institut Sophia Agrobiotech   (France)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; EXTINCTION RISK; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LABORATORY METHOD; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; METAPOPULATION; MICROCOSM; PARASITOID; POPULATION SIZE; STOCHASTICITY; THEORETICAL STUDY; VULNERABILITY; WASP;

HEXAPODA; TRICHOGRAMMA CHILONIS;

EID: 84945241848     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/oik.02718     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Altwegg, R. et al. 2013. Density-dependent dispersal and the speed of range expansions. - Divers. Distrib. 19: 60-68.
2. Bates, D. et al. 2013. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. - https://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4
3. Bonnefon, O. et al. 2014. The spatio-temporal dynamics of neutral genetic diversity. - Ecol. Complex. 20: 282-292.
4. Brassil, C. E. 2001. Mean time to extinction of a metapopulation with an Allee effect. - Ecol. Modell. 143: 9-16.
5. Brown, J. H. and Kodric-Brown, A. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography - effect of immigration on extinction. - Ecology 58: 445-449.
6. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 2004. Multimodel inference - understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. - Sociol. Meth. Res. 33: 261-304.
7. Calabrese, J. M. and Fagan, W. F. 2004. A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 2: 529-536.
8. Courchamp, F. et al. 2008. Allee effects in ecology and conservation. - Oxford Univ. Press.
9. Drake, J. M. and Kramer, A. M. 2012. Mechanistic analogy: how microcosms explain nature. - Theor. Ecol. 5: 433-444.
10. Drury, K. L. S. et al. 2007. Immigration events dispersed in space and time: factors affecting invasion success. - Ecol. Modell. 206: 63-78.
11. Ebenhard, T. 1991. Colonization in metapopulations - a review of theory and observations. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 105-121.
12. Fauvergue, X. et al. 2012. The biology of small, introduced populations, with special reference to biological control. - Evol. Appl. 5: 424-443.
13. Freckleton, R. P. 2000. Biological control as a learning process. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 263-264.
14. Garnier, J. et al. 2012. Success rate of a biological invasion in terms of the spatial distribution of the founding population. - Bull. Math. Biol. 74: 453-473.
15. Giometto, A. et al. 2014. Emerging predictable features of replicated biological invasion fronts. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111: 297-301.
16. Hanski, I. and Gaggiotti, O. E. 2004. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. - Academic Press.
17. Hastings, A. et al. 2005. The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 91-101.
18. Hayes, K. and Barry, S. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? - Biol. Invas. 10: 483-506.
19. Heg, D. et al. 2008. Experimentally induced helper dispersal in colonially breeding cooperative cichlids. - Environ. Biol. Fish. 83: 191-206.
20. Heimpel, G. E. and Asplen, M. K. 2011. A 'Goldilocks' hypothesis for dispersal of biological control agents. - Biocontrol 56: 441-450.
21. Johnson, D. M. et al. 2006. Allee effects and pulsed invasion by the gypsy moth. - Nature 444: 361-363.
22. Jonsen, I. D. and Taylor, P. D. 2000. Fine-scale movement behaviors of calopterygid damselflies are influenced by landscape structure: an experimental manipulation. - Oikos 88: 553-562.
23. Kanarek, A. et al. 2013. Allee effects, aggregation, and invasion success. - Theor. Ecol. 6: 153-164.
24. Kean, J. M. and Barlow, N. D. 2000. Effects of dispersal on local population increase. - Ecol. Lett. 3: 479-482.
25. Lande, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. - Am. Nat. 142: 911-927.
26. Lande, R. et al. 2003. Stochastic population dynamics in ecology and conservation. - Oxford Univ. Press.
27. Lewis, M. A. and Kareiva, P. 1993. Allee dynamics and the spread of invading organisms. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 43: 141-158.
28. Lovei, G. L. et al. 1998. Dispersal and effects of barriers on the movement of the New Zealand hover fly Melanostoma fasciatum (Dipt., Syrphidae) on cultivated land. - J. Appl. Entomol. 122: 115-120.
29. Melbourne, B. A. and Hastings, A. 2009. Highly variable spread rates in replicated biological invasions: fundamental limits to predictability. - Science 325: 1536-1539.
30. Morel-Journel, T. et al. 2015. Data from: The highs and lows of dispersal: how connectivity and initial population size jointly shape establishment dynamics in discrete landscapes. - Dryad Digital Repository, < http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jv7n7 >.
31. Noël, F. et al. 2011. Establishment success of 25 rare wetland species introduced into restored habitats is best predicted by ecological distance to source habitats. - Biol. Conserv. 144: 602-609.
32. Pachepsky, E. and Levine, J. M. 2011. Density dependence slows invader spread in fragmented landscapes. - Am. Nat. 177: 18-28.
33. Panja, D. 2004. Effects of fluctuations on propagating fronts. - Phys. Rep.-Rev. Sec. Phys. Lett. 393: 87-174.
34. Parlato, E. H. and Armstrong, D. P. 2013. Predicting post-release establishment using data from multiple reintroductions. - Biol. Conserv. 160: 97-104.
35. Pratt, S. C. et al. 2002. Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52: 117-127.
36. Rasband, W. S. 1997-2015. ImageJ. - Natl Inst.s of Health.
37. Rodriguez-Freire, M. and Crecente-Maseda, R. 2008. Directional connectivity of wolf (Canis lupus) populations in northwest spain and anthropogenic effects on dispersal patterns. - Environ. Model. Assess. 13: 35-51.
38. Roques, L. et al. 2012. Allee effect promotes diversity in traveling waves of colonization. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109: 8828-8833.
39. Rueness, E. K. et al. 2003. Ecological and genetic spatial structuring in the Canadian lynx. - Nature 425: 69-72.
40. Simberloff, D. 2009. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 81-102.
41. Smith, S. M. 1996. Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use. - Annu. Rev. Entomol. 41: 375-406.
42. Stokes, A. N. 1976. On two types of moving front in quasilinear diffusion. - Math. Biosci. 31: 307-315.
43. Taylor, P. D. et al. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. - Oikos 68: 571-573.
44. Veit, R. R. and Lewis, M. A. 1996. Dispersal, population growth, and the Allee effect: dynamics of the house finch invasion of eastern North America. - Am. Nat. 148: 255-274.
45. Vercken, E. et al. 2011. Critical patch size generated by Allee effect in gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.). - Ecol. Lett. 14: 179-186.
46. Vercken, E. et al. 2013. Time-lag in extinction dynamics in experimental populations: evidence for a genetic Allee effect? - J. Anim. Ecol. 82: 621-631.
47. Wang, M. H. and Kot, M. 2001. Speeds of invasion in a model with strong or weak Allee effects. - Math. Biosci. 171: 83-97.
48. Williamson, M. and Fitter, A. 1996. The varying success of invaders. - Ecology 77: 1661-1666.
49. Winemiller, K. O. et al. 2008. Fish assemblages of the Casiquiare River, a corridor and zoogeographical filter for dispersal between the Orinoco and Amazon basins. - J. Biogeogr. 35: 1551-1563.
50. Wratten, S. D. et al. 2003. Field boundaries as barriers to movement of hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in cultivated land. - Oecologia 134: 605-611.