Towards deliberative and pragmatic co-management: a comparison between inshore fisheries authorities in England and Scotland

Environmental Politics

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 729-748

  Pieraccini, Margherita ^a   Cardwell, Emma ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

co management; deliberative theories; inshore fisheries institutions; pragmatism; Procedural justice; UK

Indexed keywords

COMANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHERY POLICY;

ENGLAND; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84945217236     PISSN: 09644016     EISSN: 17438934     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1090372     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. A.Agrawal, and C.C.Gibson,, 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27 (4), 629–649. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
2. T.Appleby,, 2013. Privatising fishing rights: the way to a fisheries wonderland? Public Law, 2, 481–497.
3. T.Appleby, and P.J.S.Jones,, 2012. The marine and coastal access act—a hornets’ nest? Marine Policy, 36 (1), 73–77. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2011.03.009
4. D.Armitage,, et al., 2011. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21 (3), 995–1004. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
5. F.Berkes,, 2002. Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspective from the bottom-up. In: E.Ostrom, et al, eds. The drama of the commons. Washington: National Academy Press, 293–322.
6. F.Berkes, and G.R.Preston,, 1991. Co-management: the evolution of the theory and practice of joint administration of living resources. Alternatives, 18 (2), 12–18.
7. J.Bohman,, 2004. Realizing deliberative democracy as a mode of inquiry: pragmatism, social facts, and normative theory. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 23–43. doi:10.1353/jsp.2004.0002
8. G.Borrini-Feyerabend,, et al., 2004. Sharing power: learning by-doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. Teheran: IIED, IUCN/CEESP, Cenesta.
9. N.Bown,, T.Gray,, and S.M.Stead,, 2013. Contested forms of governance in marine protected areas: a study of co-management and adaptive co-management. Oxon: Routledge.
10. L.Carlsson, and F.Berkes,, 2005. Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75, 65–76.
11. W.R.Caspary,, 2008. On Dewey, Habermas and deliberative democracy. Journal of Public Deliberation, 4 (1), Article 10.
12. Committee on Standards in Public Life, 1995. The seven principles of public life. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-7-principles-of-public-life [Accessed 4 June 2015].
13. J.Dewey,, 2012. The public and its problems: an essay in political inquiry, edited and with an introduction by Rogers, M. L. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
14. J.Habermas,, 1987. The theory of communicative action, volume 2: lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
15. J.Habermas,, 1990. Moral consciousness and communicative action. London: MIT Press.
16. J.Habermas,, 1996. Between facts and norms. London: MIT Press.
17. D.Held,, 2004. Global covenant: the social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. D.Huitema,, E.Mostert,, W.Egas, et al. 2009. Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda. Ecology and Society, 14 (1), 26.
19. S.Jentoft,, B.J.McCay,, and D.C.Wilson,, 1998. Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, 22 (4–5), 423–436. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00040-7
20. N.Marres,, 2007. The issues deserve more credit: pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37 (5), 759–780. doi:10.1177/0306312706077367
21. N.McAfee,, 2004. Three models of democratic deliberation. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 18 (1), 44–59. doi:10.1353/jsp.2004.0007
22. B.J.McCay, and J.M.Acheson,, eds., 1987. The question of the commons: the culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
23. K.H.Mikalsen, and S.Jentoft,, 2001. From user-groups to stakeholders? The public interest in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 25 (4), 281–292. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00015-X
24. [MMO] Marine Management Organisation. 2015. Appointment of inshore fisheries conservation authority members by the marine management organisation, information for candidates. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/347496/20140826_Information_for_candidates.pdf [Accessed 4 June 2015].
25. G.F.Pappas,, 2008. John Dewey and the contemporary ‘Deliberative Turn’ in political theory. Southwest Philosophical Studies, 30, 71–78.
26. J.Phillipson, and D.Symes,, 2010. Recontextualising inshore fisheries: the changing face of British inshore fisheries management. Marine Policy, 34 (6), 1207–1214. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.04.005
27. E.W.Pinkerton,, ed., 1989. Cooperative management of local fisheries: new directions for improved management and community development. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
28. R.Plummer, and J.Baird,, 2013. Adaptive co-management for climate change adaptation: considerations for the Barents region. Sustainability, 5 (2), 629–642. doi:10.3390/su5020629
29. R.Plummer, and J.FitzGibbon,, 2004. Co-management of natural resources: a proposed framework. Environmental Management, 33 (6), 876–855. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-3038-y
30. R.S.Pomeroy, and F.Berkes,, 1997. Two to tango: the role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, 21 (5), 465–480. doi:10.1016/S0308-597X(97)00017-1
31. A.Sandström,, B.Crona,, and Ö.Bodin,, 2014. Legitimacy in co-management: the impact of preexisting structures, social networks and governance strategies. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24 (1), 60–76. doi:10.1002/eet.v24.1
32. Scottish Government, 2005. A strategic framework for inshore fisheries in Scotland. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2005/03/20860/File-1 [Accessed 4 June 2015]
33. Scottish Government, 2010. Marine Scotland: report on social and economic objectives for a Scottish marine plan. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/03/30180908/6 [Accessed 4 June 2015].
34. Scottish Inshore Fisheries Groups, 2013. Available from: http://ifgs.org.uk/files/8013/7716/0930/IFG_Mapping_2013.pdf [Accessed 4 June 2015].
35. Scottish Inshore Fisheries Groups, 2015. Welcome to the Scottish inshore fisheries groups [online]. Available from: http://ifgs.org.uk/ [Accessed 4 June 2015].
36. P.Steinberg,, 2001. The social construction of the ocean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. D.C.Wilson,, J.R.Nielsen,, and P.Degnbol,, eds., 2003. The fisheries co-management experience. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. I.M.Young,, 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.