Damage detection at an aluminum beam from discrete and continuous strain measurements

Structural Health Monitoring 2013: A Roadmap to Intelligent Structures - Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, IWSHM 2013

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 53-64

  Sierra Perez J ^a   Guemes A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA BOLIVARIANA   (Colombia)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE DETECTION; DEFECTS; FIBER BRAGG GRATINGS; INTELLIGENT STRUCTURES; OPTICAL FIBERS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRAIN;

AUTOMATED TECHNIQUES; DIFFERENT SIZES; DISTRIBUTED SENSING; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; STATIC AND DYNAMIC CONDITIONS; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 84945198409     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. C.-P. Fritzen, H.-N. Li y D.-S. Li, «A note on fast computation of effective independence through QR downdating for sensor placement, » Mechanical systems and signal processing, pp. 1160-1168, 2009.
2. C.-P. Fritzen y K. Bohle, «Global damage identification of the sleequake structure using modal data, » mechanical systems and signal processing, pp. 111-117, 2003.
3. J. Holnicki-Szulc, Smart technologies for safety engineering, Warsaw: Jhon Wiley & Sons, 2008.
4. I. Lopez y N. Sarigul-Klijn, «A review of uncertainty in flight vehicle structural damage monitoring, diagnosis and control: chalenges and opportunities, » Progress in aerospace sciences, vol. 46, pp. 247-273, 2010.
5. L. Mujica, J. Rodellar, A. Fernandez y A. Guemes, «Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures, » Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 10, pp. 539-553, 2011.
6. T. Kourti y J. MacGregor, «Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods, » Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, pp. 3-21, 1995.
7. P. Nomikos y J. F. MacGregor, «Monitoring batch Processes Using Multiway Principal Component Analysis, » AIChE Journal, pp. 1361-1375, 1994.
8. I. Jolliffe, Principal Component Analysis, Aberdeen: Springer, 2002.
9. J. Westerhuis, T. Kourti y J. MacGtrgot, «Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch processdata, » Chemometrics, no 13, pp. 397-413, 1999.
10. S. Gurden, J. Westerhuis, R. Bro y A. Smilde, «A comparision of multiway regression and scaling methods, » Chemometrics and Intellingent LAboratory Systems, no 59, pp. 121-136, 2001.
11. K. Villez, K. Steppe y D. De Pauw, «Use of unfold PCA for on-line plant stress monitoring and sensor failure detection, » Biosystems Engineering, pp. 23-34, 2009.
12. L. Mujica, D. Tibaduiza y J. Rodellar, «Data-driven multiactuator piezoelectric system for structural damage localization, » Fifth World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring, pp. 1-8, 2010.
13. S. Wold, N. Kettaneh, H. Fridén y A. Holmberg, «Modelling and diagnostics of batch processes and analogous kinetic experiments, » Chemometrics and Intellingent Laboratory Systems, pp. 331-340, 1998.
14. D. Tibaduza, L. Mujica, M. Anaya y J. Rodellar, «Combined and I indices based on principal component analysis for damage detection and localization, » de Structural health monitoring 2011: condition-based maintenance and intelligent structures: proceedings of the 8th International workshop on structural health monitoring, Standford, 2011.
15. J. Sierra, A. Güemes y L. E. Mujica, «Damage detection by using FBGs and strain field pattern recognition techniques, » Smart materials and structures, vol. 22, pp. 1-10, 2013.
16. R. Jhonson y D. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Pearson, 2007.
17. P. Nomikos y J. MacGregor, «Multivariate SPC charts for monitoring batch processes, » Technometrics, pp. 41-59, 1995.
18. C. E. García, «Caracterización de coeficientes de Expansion termica, » Madrid, 2010.