Carry-over effects of the social environment on future divorce probability in a wild bird population

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 282, Issue 1817, 2015, Pages

  Culina, Antica ^a   Hind, Camilla A ^a,b   Sheldon, Ben C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Divorce; Great tit; Mate choice; Pair formation; Social environment

Indexed keywords

DIVORCE; FITNESS; FUTURE PROSPECT; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; MATE CHOICE; MATE FIDELITY; PAIR BOND; PASSERINE; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SOCIAL CHANGE; SOCIAL NETWORK; WILD POPULATION;

AVES;

ANIMAL; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PAIR BONDING; PASSERIFORMES; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PAIR BOND; PASSERIFORMES; REPRODUCTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT;

EID: 84945184721     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0920     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Smith EA, Mulder MB, Hill K. 2001 Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 128-135. doi:10.1016/S0169-53470002077-2
2. Kameda T, Nakanishi D. 2003 Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability? Rogers’s question revisited. Evol. Hum. Behav. 24, 242-260. doi:10.1016/S1090-51380300015-1
3. Apicella CL, Marlowe FW, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. 2012 Social networks and cooperation in hunter- gatherers. Nature 481, 497-501. doi:10.1038/nature10736
4. McDonald DB. 2007 Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10 910-10 914. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701159104
5. Oh KP, Badyaev AV. 2010 Structure of social networks in a passerine bird: consequences for sexual selection and the evolution of mating strategies. Am. Nat. 176, E80-E89. doi:10.1086/655216
6. Kurvers R, Krause J, Croft DP, Wilson ADM, Wolf M. 2014 The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 326-335. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.002
7. Farine DR, Sheldon BC. 2015 Selection for territory acquisition is modulated by social network structure in wild songbird. J. Evol. Biol. 28, 547-556. doi:10.1111/jeb.12587
8. Bateson M, Healy SD. 2005 Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 659-664. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.013
9. Choudhury S. 1995 Divorce in birds: a review of the hypotheses. Anim. Behav. 50, 413-429. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0256
10. Black JM. 1996 Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Petrie M, Kempenaers B. 1998 Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 52-58. doi:10.1016/S0169-53479701232-9
12. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA. 2002 Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Mol. Ecol. 11, 2195-2212. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01613.x
13. Ens BJ, Safriel UN, Harris MP. 1993 Divorce in the long-lived and monogamous oystercatcher, Haematopus ostralegus: incompatibility or choosing the better option. Anim. Behav. 45, 1199-1217. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1142
14. Maxin D, Berec L. 2010 A two-sex demographic model with single-dependent divorce rate. J. Theor. Biol. 265, 647-656. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.06.013
15. Culina A, Radersma R, Sheldon BC. 2014 Trading up: fitness consequences of divorce in monogamous birds. Biol. Rev. doi:10.1111/brv.12143
16. Dubois F, Cezilly F, Pagel M. 1998 Mate fidelity and coloniality in waterbirds: a comparative analysis. Oecologia 116, 433-440. doi:10.1007/s004420050607
17. Jeschke JM, Kokko H. 2008 Mortality and other determinants of bird divorce rate. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1-9. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0646-9
18. Liker A, Freckleton RP, Szekely T. 2014 Divorce and infidelity are associated with skewed adult sex ratios in birds. Curr. Biol. 24, 880-884. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.02.059
19. Sih A, Hanser SF, McHugh KA. 2009 Social network theory: new insights and issues for behavioral ecologists. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 975-988. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0725-6
20. Garroway CJ, Radersma R, Hinde CA. 2014 Perspectives on social network analyses of bird populations. In Animal social networks eds J Krause, DP Croft, R James, pp. 171-184. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Gosler AG. 1993 The great tit. London, UK: Paul Hamlyn.
22. Hinde RA. 1952 The behavior of the great tit Parus major and some other related species. Behaviour Suppl. 2, 1-201
23. Saitou T. 2002 Factors affecting divorce in the great tit Parus major. Ibis 144, 311-316. doi:10.1046/j.1474-919X.2002.00016.x
24. Culina A. 2014 With or without you: divorce and pair fidelity in monogamous birds. DPhil thesis. Oxford University.
25. Dhondt AA, Adriaensen F, Plompen W. 1996 Between and within-population variation in mate fidelity in the great tit. In Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy ed. JM Black, pp. 235-248. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Culina A, Lachish S, Pradel R, Choquet R, Sheldon BC. 2013 A multievent approach to estimating pair fidelity and heterogeneity in state transitions. Ecol. Evol. 3, 4326-4338. doi:10.1002/ece3.729
27. Perrins CM, McCleery RH. 1985 The effect of age and pair bond on the breeding success of great tits Parus major. Ibis 127, 306-315. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1985.tb05072.x
28. Szulkin M, Sheldon BC. 2008 Correlates of the occurrence of inbreeding in a wild bird population. Behav. Ecol. 19, 1200-1207. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn086
29. Pampus M, Schmidt KH, Wiltschko W. 2005 Pair bond and breeding success in blue tits Parus caeruleus and great tits Parus major. Ibis 147, 92-108. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2004.00376.x
30. Perrins CM. 1965 Population fluctuations and clutch size in the great tit, Parus major L. J. Anim. Ecol. 34, 601-647. doi:10.2307/2453
31. Perrins CM. 1979 British tits. London, UK: Collins.
32. Matechou E, Cheng SC, Kidd LR, Garroway CJ. 2015 Reproductive consequences of the timing of seasonal movements in a non-migratory wild bird population. Ecology 96, 1641-1649. doi:10.1890/14-0886.1
33. Franks DW, Ruxton GD, James R. 2010 Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 493-503. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0865-8
34. Psorakis I, Roberts SJ, Rezek I, Sheldon BC. 2012 Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams. J. R. Soc. Interface 9, 3055-3066. doi:10.1098/rsif.2012.0223
35. Psorakis I et al. 2015 Inferring social structure from temporal data. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 857-866. doi:10.1007/s00265-015-1906-0
36. Cairns SJ, Schwager SJ. 1987 A comparison of association indexes. Anim. Behav. 35, 1454-1469. doi:10.1016/S0003-34728780018-0
37. Whitehead H. 2008 Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Anderson DR, Burnham KP. 2002 Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. J. Wild. Manag. 6, 912-918. doi:10.2307/3803155
39. R Core Team. 2012 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Core Team.
40. Westneat DF, Walters A, McCarthy TM, Hatch MI, Hein WK. 2000 Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice. Anim. Behav. 59, 467-476. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1341
41. Callander S, Jennions MD, Backwell PRY. 2011 Female choice over short and long distances: neighbour effects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 2071-2078. doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1216-0
42. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. 2003 Mating systems and strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Lindstedt ER, Oh KP, Badyaev AV. 2007 Ecological, social, and genetic contingency of extrapair behavior in a socially monogamous bird. J. Avian Biol. 2, 214-223. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3528
44. Aplin LM, Farine DR, Morand-Ferron J, Cole EF, Cockburn A, Sheldon BC. 2013 Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits Parus major. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1365-1372. doi:10.1111/ele.12181
45. Andersson M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46. Clutton-Brock T. 2009 Sexual selection in females. Anim. Behav. 77, 3-11. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.026
47. Johnstone RA, Reynolds JD, Deutsch JC. 1996 Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50, 1382-1391. doi:10.2307/2410876
48. Cézilly F, Preault M, Dubois F, Faivre B, Patris B. 2000 Pair-bonding in birds and the active role of females: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Behav. Process. 51, 83-92. doi:10.1016/S0376-63570000120-0
49. Ramsay SM, Otter KA, Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT. 2000 Divorce and extrapair mating in female black-capped chickadees Parus atricapillus: separate strategies with a common target. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 18-23. doi:10.1007/s002650000270
50. Poirier NE, Whittingham LA, Dunn PO. 2003 Effects of paternity and mate availability on mate switching in house wrens. Condor 105, 816-821. doi:10.1650/7201
51. Andreu J, Barba E. 2006 Breeding dispersal of great tits Parus major in a homogeneous habitat: effects of sex, age, and mating status. Ardea 94, 45-58.
52. Farine DR et al. 2015 The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds. R. Soc. open sci. 2, 150057. doi:10.1098/rsos.150057
53. Gersick AS, Snyder-Mackler N, White DJ. 2012 Ontogeny of social skills: social complexity improves mating and competitive strategies in male brownheaded cowbirds. Anim. Behav. 83, 1171-1177. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0223
54. Gilby IC, Brent LJN, Wroblewski EE, Rudicell RS, Hahn BH, Goodall J, Pusey AE. 2013 Fitness benefits of coalitionary aggression in male chimpanzees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol 67, 373-381. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1457-6
55. Stanton MA, Mann J. 2012 Early social networks predict survival in wild bottlenose dolphins. PLoS ONE 7, e47508. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047508
56. Nicolai CA, Sedinger JS, Ward DH, Boyd WS. 2012 Mate loss affects survival but not breeding in black brant geese. Behav. Ecol. 23, 643-648. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars009
57. Berec L, Boukal DS. 2004 Implications of mate search, mate choice and divorce rate for population dynamics of sexually reproducing species. Oikos 104, 122-132. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12753.x
58. DuVal EH. 2013 Female mate fidelity in a lek mating system and its implications for the evolution of cooperative lekking behavior. Am. Nat. 181, 213-222. doi:10.1086/668830