Application of neutrosophic set to multicriteria decision making by COPRAS

Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1-15

  Bausys, Romualdas ^a   Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ^a   Kaklauskas, Artūras ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Baltic sea; Complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) method; Liquefied natural gas terminal; Multi criteria decision making(MCDM); Neutrosophic set; Selection of location

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945184682     PISSN: 0424267X     EISSN: 18423264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. [1] Balezentis, T., Zeng, S., Balezentis, A. (2013), MULTIMOORA-IFN: A MCDM Method Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number for Performance Management. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 48, 4, 85-102;
2. [2] Baležentis, T., Zeng, S. (2013), Group Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based upon Interval-Valued Fuzzy Numbers: An Extension of the MULTIMOORA Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 40, 2, 543–550;
3. [3] Dheena, P., Mohanraj, G. (2011), Multicriteria Decision-Making Combining Fuzzy Set Theory, Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points for Location Site Selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10, 13260-13265;
4. [4] Elevli, B. (2014), Logistics Freight Center Locations Decision by Using Fuzzy-PROMETHEE. Transport, 29, 4, 412-418;
5. [5] Esbouei, S. K., Ghadikolaei, A. S., Antuchevičienė, J. (2014), Using Fanp and Fuzzy Vikor for Ranking Manufacturing Companies Based on Their Financial Performance. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 48, 3, 141-162;
6. [6] Ghadikolaei, A. S., Esbouei, S. K., Antuchevičienė, J. (2014), Applying Fuzzy MCDM for Financial Performance Evaluation of Iranian Companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 20, 2, 274-291;
7. [7] Hajiagha, S. H. R.; Hashemi, S. S.; Zavadskas, E. K. (2013), A Complex Proportional Assessment Method for Group Decision Making in an Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, 1, 22-37;
8. [8] Kaya, I., Kahraman, C. (2014), A Comparison of Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making Methods for Intelligent Building Assessment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20, 1, 59-69;
9. [9] Majumdar, P., Samanta, S.K. (2014), On Similarity and Entropy of Neutrosophic Sets. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 26, 3, 1245-1252;
10. [10] Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E.K. (2015), Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-making Techniques and Applications – Two Decades from1994 to 2014. Experts Systems with Applications, 42, 4126-4148;
11. [11] Meng, F., Chen, X. (2014), An Approach to Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information Based on Hybrid Shapley Operators. Informatica, 25, 4, 617-642;
12. [12] Patrascu, V. (2013), Neutrosophic Information in the Framework of Multivalued Representation. The 21-th Conf. Applied Industrial Mathematics, CAIM 2013, Bucharest, Romania;
13. [13] Peng, J.J., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., Chen, X.H. (2014), An Outranking Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems with Simplified Neutrosophic Sets; Applied Soft Computing, 25, 336-346;
14. [14] Sahin, R., Kucuk, A. (2014), Subsethood Measure for Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, DOI: 10.3233/IFS-141304;
15. [15] Smarandache, F. (1999), A Unifying Field in Logics. Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic Probability, Set and Logic. American Research Press, Rehoboth;
16. [16] Smarandache, F. (2014), A Geometric Interpretation of the Neutrosophic Set, A Generalization of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set. Neutrosophic Theory and Its Applications, ed. Smarandache F., Europa Nova, Brussels, 2014, 27-35;
17. [17] Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y. Q., Sunderraman, R. (2010), Single Valued Neutrosophic Sets. Multispace and Multistructure, 4, 410-413;
18. [18] Yazdani-Chamzini, A. (2014), An Integrated Fuzzy Multi Criteria Group Decision Making Model for Handling Equipment Selection. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20, 5, 660-673;
19. [19] Ye, J.(2013), Multicriteria Decision-making Method Using the Correlation Coefficient under Single-valued Neutrosophic Environment.International Journal of General Systems, 42, 4, 386–394;
20. [20] Yu, D. (2013), Intuitionistic Fuzzy Prioritized Operators and Their Application in Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, 1, 1-21;
21. [21] Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Sarka, V. (1994), The New Method of Multicriteria Complex Proportional Assessment of Projects. Technological and Economical Development of Economy, 1, 3, 131-139;
22. [22] Zavadskas, E.K., Antuchevičienė, J., Hajiagha, S.H.R., Hashemi, S.S. (2014), Extension of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers (WASPAS-IVIF).Applied Soft Computing 24, 1013-1021;
23. [23] Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Bagocius, V. (2015), Multi-Criteria Selection of a Deep-water Port in the Eastern Baltic Sea; Applied Soft Computing, 26, 180-192;
24. [24] Zeng, S., Baležentis, T., Chen, J., Luo, J. (2013), A Projection Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information. Informatica,24, 3, 485-503;
25. [25] Zhang, Z., Wu, C. (2014), A Novel Method for Single-valued Neutrosophic Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Incomplete Weight Information. Neutrosophic Sets & Systems, 4, 35-49.