Mapping soil moisture across an irrigated field using electromagnetic conductivity imaging

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 163, Issue , 2016, Pages 285-294

  Huang, J ^a   Scudiero, E ^b   Choo, H ^a   Corwin, D L ^b   Triantafilis, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

DUALEM 421; EM inversion; Soil volumetric water content; Water use efficiency

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MAPPING; MOISTURE; SOIL MOISTURE; STATISTICAL METHODS;

APPARENT SOIL ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITIES; COEFFICIENT OF DETERMINATION; DUALEM-421; ELECTROMAGNETIC CONDUCTIVITY; EM INVERSION; LEAVE-ONE-OUT CROSS VALIDATIONS; SOIL VOLUMETRIC WATER CONTENTS; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

SOILS;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC METHOD; IMAGING METHOD; MAPPING METHOD; SOIL DEPTH; SOIL MOISTURE; WATER CONTENT; WATER USE EFFICIENCY;

CALIFORNIA; SAN JACINTO; UNITED STATES;

MEDICAGO SATIVA;

EID: 84945181724     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: 18732283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 1998, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
2. Auken E., Foged N., Sorensen K.I. Model recognition by 1-D laterally constrained inversion of resistivity data. Proceedings of 8th Meeting Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, EEGS-ES 2002, 241-244. M.S. Matias, C. Grangeia (Eds.).
3. Ayers R.S., Westcot D.W. Water Quality for Agriculture, Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29, Revision 1 1994, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
4. Blonquist J., r, Jones J.M., Robinson S.B., DA Precise irrigation scheduling for turfgrass using a subsurface electromagnetic soil moisture sensor. Agri. Water Manage. 2006, 84(1):153-165.
5. a-directed soil sampling. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 2013, 18(1):1-25.
6. Corwin D.L., Lesch S.M., Segal E., Skaggs T.H., Bradford S.A. Comparison of sampling strategies for characterizing spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity directed soil sampling. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 2010, 15(3):147-162.
7. Corwin D.L., Kaffka S.R., Hopmans J.W., Mori Y., Van Groenigen J.W., Van Kessel C., Lesch S.M., Oster J.D. Assessmentand field-scale mapping of soil quality properties of a saline-sodic soil. Geoderma 2003, 114(3):231-259.
8. Dafflon B., Hubbard S.S., Ulrich C., Peterson J.E. Electrical conductivity imaging of active layer and permafrost in an Arctic ecosystem, through advanced inversion of electromagnetic induction data. Vadose Zone J. 2013, 12(4).
9. Dingman S.L. Physical Hydrology 2002, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. second ed.
10. Dunne T., Moore T.R., Taylor C.H. Recognition and prediction of runoff zones in humid regions. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 1975, 20:305-327.
11. EMTOMO, 2014. EM4Soil Version 2. EMTOMO, R. Alice Cruz 4, Odivelas, Lisboa, Portugal.
12. FAO, 2002. Food Balance Sheets. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
13. Fischer G., Tubiello F.N., Van Velthuizen H., Wiberg D.A. Climate change impacts on irrigation water requirements: effects of mitigation, 1990-2080. Technol. Forecasting Social Change 2007, 74(7):1083-1107.
14. GeoTom Software, 2010. GeoTom LLC. 13,785 Diamond Path,Apple Valley, MN 55,124, USA.
15. Georgakakos A.P., Yao H., Georgakakos K.P. Ensemble streamflow prediction adjustment for upstream water use and regulation. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519:2952-2966.
16. Gooley L., Huang J., Page D., Triantafilis J. Digital soil mapping of available water content using proximal and remotely sensed data. Soil Use Manage. 2014, 30(1):139-151.
17. Hansen J.R., Ernstsen V., Refsgaard J.C., Hansen S. Field scale heterogeneity of redox conditions in till-upscaling to a catchment nitrate model. Hydrogeol. J. 2008, 16(7):1251-1266.
18. Hedley C.B., Roudier P., Yule I.J., Ekanayake J., Bradbury S. Soil water status and water table depth modelling using electromagnetic surveys for precision irrigation scheduling. Geoderma 2013, 199:22-29.
19. Hedley C.B., Yule I.J., Bradbury S. Analysis of potential benefits of precision irrigationfor variable soils at five pastoral and arable production sites in New Zealand. 19th World Soil Congress 2010, ISBN: 978-0-646-53783-2.
20. Huang J., Davies G.B., Bowd D., Monteiro Santos F.A., Triantafilis J. Spatial prediction of the exchangeable sodium percentage at multiple depths using electromagnetic inversion modelling. Soil Use Manage. 2014, 30(2):241-250.
21. Huang J., Mokhtari A.R., Cohen D.R., Monteiro Santos F.A., Triantafilis J. Modelling soil salinity across a gilgai landscape by inversion of EM38 and EM 31 data. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2015, 66(5):951-960.
22. Huang J., Scudiero E., Clary W., Corwin D.L., Triantafilis J. Time-lapse monitoring of soil water content using electromagnetic conductivity imaging. Soil Use Manage. 2016, in press.
23. Huth N.I., Poulton P.L. An electromagnetic induction method for monitoring variation in soil moisture in agroforestry systems. Soil Res. 2007, 45(1):63-72.
24. Kachanoski R.G., Wesenbeeck I.V., Gregorich E. Estimating spatial variations of soil water content using noncontacting electromagnetic inductive methods. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1988, 68(4):715-722.
25. Kachanoski R.G., Wesenbeeck I.V., Jong E.D. Field scale patterns of soil water storage from non-contacting measurements of bulk electrical conductivity. Can. J. Soil Sci. 1990, 70(3):537-542.
26. Kelly B.F.J., Acworth R.I., Greve A.K. Better placement of soil moisture point measurements guided by 2D resistivity tomography for improved irrigation scheduling. Soil Res. 2011, 49(6). 661-669.
27. Keller, G.V., Frischknecht, F.C., 1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting. International Series of Monographs in Electromagnetic Waves, 10.
28. Kodikara J., Rajeev P., Chan D., Gallage C. Soil moisture monitoring at the field scale using neutron probe. Can. Geotechol. J. 2013, 51(3):332-345.
29. Koefoed O. Resistivity sounding on an earth model containing transition layers with linear change of resistivity with depth. Geophys. Prospect. 1979, 27(4):862-868.
30. Mester A., van der Kruk J., Zimmermann E., Vereecken H. Quantitative two-layer conductivity inversion of multi-configuration electromagnetic induction measurements. Vadose Zone J. 2011, 10(4):1319-1330.
31. Monteiro Santos F.A., Triantafilis J., Bruzgulis K.E., Roe J.A.E. Inversion of multiconfiguration electromagnetic (DUALEM-421) profiling data using a one-dimensional laterally constrained algorithm. Vadose Zone J. 2010, 9(1):117-125.
32. Robinson D.A., Lebron I., Kocar B., Phan K., Sampson M., Crook N., Fendorf S. Time-lapse geophysical imaging of soil moisture dynamics in tropical deltaic soils: an aid to interpreting hydrological and geochemical processes. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45(4).
33. Rodriguez-Iturbe I. Ecohydrology: a hydrologic perspective of climate-soil-vegetation dynamics. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36(1):3-9.
34. Institute S.A.S. JMP Version 10. SAS Institute Inc 2012, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
35. Schwartz B.F., Schreiber M.A., Yan T. Quantifying field-scale soil moisture using electrical resistivity imaging. J. Hydrol. 2008, 362:234-246.
36. Sharma S.P., Kaikkonen P. Appraisal of equivalence and suppression problems in 1D EM and DC measurements using global optimization and joint inversion. Geophys.Prospect. 1999, 47(2):219-249.
37. Triantafilis J., Monteiro Santos F.A. Electromagnetic conductivity imaging (EMCI) of soil using a DUALEM-421 and inversion modelling software (EM4Soil). Geoderma 2013, 211-212:28-38.
38. Triantafilis J., Monteiro Santos F.A. 2-dimensional soil and vadose zone representation using an EM38 and EM34 and a laterally constrained inversion model. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2009, 47(8):809-820.
39. Triantafilis J., Terhune C.H., Santos F.M. An inversion approach to generate electromagnetic conductivity images from signal data. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 43:88-95.
40. Salinity Laboratory Staff U.S. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook 60 1954, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
41. von Hebel C., Rudolph S., Mester A., Huisman J.A., Kumbhar P., Vereecken H., van der Kruk J. Three-dimensional imaging of subsurface structural patterns using quantitative large-scale multiconfiguration electromagnetic induction data. Water Resour. Res. 2014, 50(3):2732-2748.
42. White M.A., Thornton P.E., Running S.W. A continental phenology model for monitoring vegetation responses to interannual climatic variability. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 1997, 11(2):217-234. 10.1029/97gb00330.
43. Wraith J.M., Robinson D.A., Jones S.B., Long D.S. Spatially characterizing apparent electrical conductivity and water content of surface soils with time domain reflectometry. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2005, 46(1):239-261.