The role of macropores and multi-resolution soil survey datasets for distributed surface-subsurface flow modeling

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 516, Issue , 2014, Pages 97-106

  Yu, Xuan ^a   Duffy, Christopher ^a   Baldwin, Doug C ^b   Lin, Henry ^b  

^a The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CZO; Macropore; PIHM; Shale Hills; Soil survey; Subsurface storm flow

Indexed keywords

CZO; FLOW MODEL; MACRO PORES; PIHM; SUBSURFACE STORM FLOWS;

SOIL SURVEYS;

DATA SET; FLOW MODELING; FORESTED CATCHMENT; GROUNDWATER; MACROPORE; MOISTURE; PLANT; RECHARGE; RUNOFF; SOIL SURVEY; SOIL TYPE; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATERSHED;

EID: 84945173664     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.055     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alaoui A., Caduff U., Gerke H.H., Weingartner R. A preferential flow effects on infiltration and runoff in grassland and forest soils. Vadose Zone J. 2011, 10(1):367-377.
2. Anderson S., Dietrich W., Montgomery D., Torres R., Conrad M., Loague K. Subsurface flow paths in a steep, unchanneled catchment. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33(12):1997.
3. Andrews D.M., Lin H., Zhu Q., Jin L., Brantley S.L. Hot spots and hot moments of dissolved organic carbon export and soil organic carbon storage in the Shale Hills catchment. Vadose Zone J. 2011, 10(3):943-954.
4. Aubertin, G.M., 1971. Nature and extent of macropores in forest soils and their influence on subsurface water movement. USDA Forest Service Report, NE-192.
5. Baldwin, D., 2011. Catchment-scale Soil Water Retention Characteristics and Delineation of Hydropedological Functional Units in the Shale Hills Catchment, Pennsylvania State University.
6. Beven K., Germann P. Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour. Res. 1982, 18(5):1311-1325.
7. Beven K., Germann P. Macropores and water flow in soils revisited. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49:3071-3092.
8. Chen F., Dudhia J. Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Weather Rev. 2001, 129(4):569-585.
9. Chen C., Wagenet R.J. Simulation of water and chemicals in macropore soils part 1. Representation of the equivalent macropore influence and its effect on soil-water flow. J. Hydrol. 1992, 130:105-126.
10. Corwin D.L., Hopmans J., de Rooij G.H. From field-to landscape-scale vadose zone processes: scale issues, modeling, and monitoring. Vadose Zone J. 2006, 5(1):129-139.
11. Dhillon G.S., Inamdar S. Storm event patterns of particulate organic carbon (POC) for large storms and differences with dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Biogeochemistry 2013, 1-21.
12. Dingman S.L. Physical Hydrology 2002, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. second ed.
13. Duffy, C.J., Brandes, D., Shun, T.-Y., Sedmera, K., 2000. LDMS: A Low-Dimensional Modeling System for Hillslope, Catchment and River-Basin Runoff, US Army Research Office Report.
14. Dunn S.M., Lilly A. Investigating the relationship between a soils classification and the spatial parameters of a conceptual catchment-scale hydrological model. J. Hydrol. 2001, 252(1):157-173.
15. Dunne T. Field Studies of Hillslope Flow Processes 1978, 227-293. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
16. Feddes R.A., Menenti M., Kabat P., Bastiaanssen W.G.M. Is large-scale inverse modelling of unsaturated flow with areal average evaporation and surface soil moisture as estimated from remote sensing feasible?. J. Hydrol. 1993, 143(1):125-152.
17. Gerke H.H., van Genuchten M.Th. A dual-porosity model for simulating the preferential movement of water and solutes in structured porous media. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29:305-319.
18. Graham C.B., Lin H.S. Controls and frequency of preferential flow occurrence: a 175-event analysis. Vadose Zone J. 2011, 10:816-831.
19. Grayson R.B., Blo¨schl G., Western A.W., McMahon T.A. Advances in the use of observed spatial patterns of catchment hydrological response. Adv. Water Resour. 2002, 25(8):1313-1334.
20. Hansen, N., 2011. The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Tutorial. https://www.lri.fr/~hansen/cmatutorial.pdf.
21. Hopmans J.W., Nielsen D.R., Bristow K.L. How useful are small-scale soil hydraulic property measurements for large-scale vadose zone modeling?. Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 2002, 129:247-258.
22. Hopp L., McDonnell J.J. Connectivity at the hillslope scale: identifying interactions between storm size, bedrock permeability, slope angle and soil depth. J. Hydrol. 2009, 376(3-4):378-391.
23. Hutson J.L., Wagenet R.J. A multiregion model describing water flow and solute transport in heterogeneous soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1975, 59:743-751.
24. Hwang T., Band L.E., Vose J.M., Tague C. Ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: hydrologic vegetation gradient as an indicator for lateral hydrologic connectivity of headwater catchments. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48(6).
25. Jin L., Ravella R., Ketchum B., Bierman P.R., Heaney P., White T., Brantley S.L. Mineral weathering and elemental transport during hillslope evolution at the Susquehanna/Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2010, 74(13):3669-3691.
26. Kabat P., Hutjes R.W.A., Feddes R.A. The scaling characteristics of soil parameters: from plot scale heterogeneity to subgrid parameterization. J. Hydrol. 1997, 190(3):363-396.
27. Kumar, M., 2009. Toward a hydrologic modeling system. PhD Diss. The Pennsylvania State University, 251pp.
28. Kuntz B.W., Rubin S., Berkowitz B., Singha K. Quantifying solute transport at the shale hills critical zone observatory. Vadose Zone J. 2011, 10(3):843-857.
29. Lehmann P., Hinz C., McGrath G., Tromp-van Meerveld H.J., McDonnell J.J. Rainfall threshold for hillslope outflow: an emergent property of flow pathway connectivity. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2007, 11(2):1047-1063.
30. Li R., Zhu A., Song X., Li B., Pei T., Qin C. Effects of spatial aggregation of soil spatial information on watershed hydrological modelling. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26(9):1390-1404.
31. Lin H. Temporal stability of soil moisture spatial pattern and subsurface preferential flow pathways in the Shale Hills Catchment. Vadose Zone J. 2006, 5(1):317.
32. Lin H. Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes. J. Hydrol. 2010, 393(1):3-19.
33. Lin H., Zhou X. Evidence of subsurface preferential flow using soil hydrologic monitoring in the Shale Hills Catchment. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2008, 59(1):34-49.
34. Lin H.S., Kogelmann W., Walker C., Bruns M.A. Soil moisture patterns in a forested catchment: a hydropedological perspective. Geoderma 2006, 131(3):345-368.
35. Lynch, J.A., 1976. Effects of antecedent soil moisture on storm hydrographs. Ph.D. Thesis. The Pennsylvania State University.
36. Lynch, J.A., Corbett, E.S., 1985. Source area variability during peakflow: a function of antecedent soil moisture content, in Watershed management in the eighties, ASCE.
37. McGuire K.J., McDonnell J.J. Hydrological connectivity of hillslopes and streams: characteristic time scales and nonlinearities. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46(10).
38. Meinzer F.C., Woodruff D.R., Eissenstat D.M., Lin H.S., Adams T.S., McCulloh K.A. Above-and belowground controls on water use by trees of different wood types in an eastern US deciduous forest. Tree Physiol. 2013, 33(4):345-356.
39. Mirus B.B., Loague K. How runoff begins (and ends): characterizing hydrologic response at the catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49(5):2987-3006.
40. Mirus B.B., Ebel B.A., Heppner C.S., Loague K. Assessing the detail needed to capture rainfall-runoff dynamics with physics-based hydrologic-response simulation. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47:W00H10.
41. Mohanty B.P., Bowman S.R., Hendrickx J.M.H., van Genuchten M.T. New piecewise-continuous hydraulic functions for modeling preferential flow in an intermittent-flood-irrigated field. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33:2049-2073.
42. Mosley M.P. Subsurface flow velocities through selected forest soils, South Island, New Zealand. J. Hydrol. 1982, 55(1):65-92.
43. Naithani K.J., Baldwin D.C., Gaines K.P., Lin H., Eissenstat D.M. Spatial distribution of tree species governs the spatio-temporal interaction of leaf area index and soil moisture across a forested landscape. PLoS ONE 2013, 8(3):e58704.
44. Qu Y., Duffy C.J. A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W08419.
45. Rawls W.J., Ahuja L.R., Brakensiek D.L., Shirmohammadi A. Infiltration and soil water movement. Handbook of Hydrology 1993, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, (Chapter 5). D.R. Maidment (Ed.).
46. Shi Y., Davis K.J., Duffy C.J., Yu X. Development of a coupled land surface hydrologic model and evaluation at a critical zone observatory. J. Hydrometeorol. 2013, 14:1401-1420.
47. Thomas E.M., Lin H., Duffy C.J., Sullivan P., Holmes G.H., Brantley S.L., Jin L. Spatiotemporal patterns of water stable isotope compositions at the shale hills critical zone observatory: linkages to subsurface hydrologic processes. Vadose Zone J. 2013, 12(4).
48. Tromp-van Meerveld H.J., McDonnell J.J. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147-storm analysis of the Panola hillslope. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(2).
49. Tromp-van Meerveld H.J., McDonnell J.J. Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(2).
50. Tromp-van Meerveld H.J., Weiler M. Hillslope dynamics modeled with increasing complexity. J. Hydrol. 2008, 361:24-40.
51. Van Genuchten M.T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44(5):892-898.
52. van Schaik N.L.M.B., Hendriks R.F.A., van Dam J.C. Parameterization of macropore flow using dye-tracer infiltration patterns in the SWAP model. Vadose Zone J. 2010, 9:1-12.
53. VanderKwaak, J.E., 1999. Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems. Doctorate Thesis. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
54. Vereecken H., Kasteel R., Vanderborght J., Harter T. Upscaling hydraulic properties and soil water flow processes in heterogeneous soils. Vadose Zone J. 2007, 6(1):1-28.
55. Vereecken H., Huisman J.A., Bogena H., Vanderborght J., Vrugt J.A., Hopmans J.W. On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: a review. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44(4):2008.
56. Vogel T., Gerke H.H., Zhang R., Van Genuchten M.T. Modeling flow and transport in a two-dimensional dual-permeability system with spatial variable hydraulic properties. J. Hydrol. 2000, 238:78-89.
57. Vogel T., Sanda M., Dusek J., Dohnal M., Votrubova J. Using oxygen-18 to study the role of preferential flow in the formation of hillslope runoff. Vadose Zone J. 2010, 9(2):252-259.
58. Watson K.W., Luxmoore R.J. Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50:578-582.
59. Weiler M., McDonnell J. Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology. J. Hydrol. 2004, 285(1):3-18.
60. Wo¨sten J.H.M., Pachepsky Y.A., Rawls W.J. Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. J. Hydrol. 2001, 251(3):123-150.
61. Yu X., Bhatt G., Duffy C., Shi Y. Parameterization for distributed watershed modeling using national data and evolutionary algorithm. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 58:80-90.
62. Zhang, J., 2011. Integrated approach to identifying subsurface flow in a forest catchment. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.
63. Zhang B., Tang J.L., Gao C., Zepp H. Subsurface lateral flow from hillslope and its contribution to nitrate loading in streams through an agricultural catchment during subtropical rainstorm events. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2011, 15(10):3153-3170.
64. Zhang J., Lin H., Doolittle J. Soil layering and preferential flow impacts on seasonal changes of GPR signals in two contrasting soils. Geoderma 2014, 213:560-569.