Empirical analysis of the applicability of 3D stereoscopic in air traffic control

IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Proceedings, ITSC

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 693-697

  Dang Nguyen, Thong ^a,b   Le Hong, Ha ^a,b   Tavanti, M ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^b EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE   (France)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

3D Stereoscopic Visualization; Air Traffic Control; Augmented Reality; Human Factors; Interaction; Virtual Environment

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; AUGMENTED REALITY; CONTROL TOWERS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION;

3D STEREOSCOPIC VISUALIZATION; AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER; INTERACTION; INTERACTION DEVICES; INTERRELATED COMPONENTS; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D) INTERFACES; TWO DIMENSIONAL (2 D);

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84945125540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ITSC.2003.1252040     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. ACM SIGGRAPH 2002 Course Notes on Levels of Details, August 2002.
2. Bowman, D. A. Interaction technique for common tasks in immersive virtual environments, Georgia Institute of Technology, June 1999
3. Brown, Mark A. On the Evaluation of 3D Display Technologies for Air Traffic Control, 682, August, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, 1994
4. Burnett, M.S, & Barfield, W. Perspective versus plan view air traffic control (ATC) displays: Survey and empirical results. In R.S. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 448-453). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1991.
5. Dang T., Le-Hong H., Tavanti, M., Visualization and interaction on flight trajectory in a 3D stereoscopic environment. Abstract accepted to IEEE 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, October 2003.
6. Ellis, S. R. & McGreevy, M. W. Perspective traffic display format and airline pilot traffic avoidance. Human Factors, 29, 371-382, 1987
7. Norman, D. A. The Psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books Inc, 1988.
8. Persiani, F., Liverani, A., Semi-immersive synthetic environment for cooperative air traffic control. In Proceedings of 22nd International Congress of Aeronautical Sciences, Harrogate, UK, 27/08-1/09/2000.
9. Scoggins R., Machiraju R. and Moorhead R. Enabling Level-of-Detail Matching for Exterior Scene Synthesis, Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2000, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 171-178, 2000
10. Tavanti, M., Le-Hong H., Dang T., Three-dimensional Stereoscopic visualization for Air Traffic Control Interfaces: a preliminary study. Abstract accepted to IEEE 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, October 2003.
11. Tham, M., & Wickens, C.D. Evaluation of perspective and stereoscopic displays as alternatives to plan view displays in air traffic control. University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Technical Report (ARL-93-4/FAA-93-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Res. Lab, 1993
12. Wickens, C.D., Todd, S., & Seidler, K. Three-dimensional displays: Perception, implementation, and applications. University of Illinois Institute of Aviation Technical Report (ARL-89-11/CSERIAC-89-1), Aviation Research Laboratory, Savoy, IL (also CSERIAC SOAR 89-001, AAMRL, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, December), 1989.
13. Zeltzer, D. and Drucker, S.M. A Virtual Environment System for Mission Planning. In Proceedings 1992 IMAGE VI Conference. Phoenix, AZ, 1992.
14. BARCO http://www.barco.com/
15. Intersense http://www.isense.com/