Apprenticeship and the confirmation of social boundaries

Archaeology and Apprenticeship: Body Knowledge, Identity, and Communities of Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 20-42

  Wallaert, Hélène ^a  

^a FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944885245     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Ames, C. 1992. Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84(3):261—271.
2. Arnold, D.E. 1975. Ceramic Ecology of the Ayacucho Basin, Peru: Implications for Prehistory. Current Anthropology 16(2):183—205.
3. Bailey, R. 2003. Learning to be Human: Teaching, Culture and Human Cognitive Social Evolution. London Review of Education 1:177—190.
4. Batkin, J. 1999. Pueblo Indian Figurative Traditions. Santa Fe, NM: Wheelwright Museum of the American Indian.
5. Berger, G., and N. Schiffer. 2000. Pueblo and Navajo Contemporary Pottery and Directory of Artists. Atglen, PA: Schiffer.
6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1980. Le Sens Pratique. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
7. Bril, Blandine, Valentine Roux, and Gilles Dietrich. 2000. Habiletes impliquees dans la taille des perles en calcedoine: caracteristiques motrices et cognitives d’une action situee complexe (Skills Involved in Knapping of Chalcedony Beads: Motor and Cognitive Characteristics of a Complex Situated Action). In Cornaline de l’Inde. Des pratiques techniques de Cambay aux techno- systemes de l’Indus (includes extensive English translations and a CD in both French and English). V. Roux, ed. Pp. 211—329. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
8. Bunzel, Ruth L. 1929. The Pueblo Potter: A Study of Creative Imagination in Primitive Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Childs, Carla P., and Patricia M. Greenfield. 1980. Informal Modes of Learning and Teaching: The Case of Zinacanteco Weaving. In Advances in Cross- Cultural Psychology. N. Warren, ed. Pp. 269—316. New York: Academic Press.
10. Crown, Patricia L. 1999. Socialization in American Southwest Pottery Decoration. In Pottery and People: A Dynamic Interaction. J.M. Skibo and G.M. Feinman, eds. Pp. 25—43. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
11. David, Nicholas, and Carol Kramer. 2001. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. David, Nicholas, J. Sterner, and K. Gavua. 1988. Why Pots Are Decorated. Current Anthropology 29(3):365—389.
13. Deboer, W.R. 1990. Interaction, Imitation, and Communication as Expressed in Style: The Ucayali Experience. In The Uses of Style in Archaeology. M. Conkey and C. Hastorf, eds. Pp. 82—104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Dietler, M., and I. Herbich. 1994. Ceramics and Ethnic Identity: Ethnoarchaeo- logical Observations on the Distribution of Pottery Style and the Relationship between the Social Contexts of Production and Consumption.
15. Cuite et Societe: La Ceramique, Document Technique, Economique, Culturel. Didier Binder and Jean Courtin, eds. Pp. 459—472. Juan-Les-Pins, France: XIVeme Rencontres Internationales d’Archeologie et d’Histoire d’Antibes.
16. Dillingham, R. 1994. Fourteen Families in Pueblo Pottery. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
17. Ditter. Alfred, and Fred Plog. 1999. Generations in Clay. Pueblo Pottery of the American Southwest. Flagstaff, AZ: Northland Pub.
18. Dobres, Marcia-Anne, and Christopher R. Hoffman. 1999. The Social Dynamics of Technology. Practice, Politics and World View. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.
19. Fraisse, P., and J. Piaget. 1963. La Perception. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
20. Goody, E. 1993. Informal Learning of Adult Roles in Baale. In Images d’Afrique et Sciences Sociales. Les Pays Lobi, Birifar et Dagara. M. Fieloux, J. Lombard, and J.-M. Kambou-Ferrand, eds. Pp. 483—491 Paris: Karthala.
21. Gosselain, Olivier P. 1998. Social and Technical Identity in a Clay Crystal Ball. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. M.T. Stark, ed. Pp. 78—106. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
22. Goulet, J.A. 1998. Ways of Knowing. Experience, Knowledge, and Power among the Dene Tha. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
23. Grimes, B.F. 1996. Ethnnologue Language Names Index. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
24. Herbich, I., and M Dietler. 1991. Aspects of the Ceramic System of the Luo of Kenya. In Topferei-und Keramikforschung 2. H. Ludtke and R. Vossen, eds. Pp. 105—135. Bonn: R. Habelt.
25. Hewett, E.D., J. Henderson, and W. Robbins. 1913. The Physiography of the Rio Grande Valley, New Mexico, in Relation to Pueblo Culture. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 64:71—76.
26. Hodder, Ian. 1988. Comments on David, Sterner and Gavua. Current Anthropology 29(3):382—383.
27. Hosler, D. 1996. Technical Choices, Social Categories and Meaning among the Andean Potters of Las Animas. Journal of Material Culture 1:63—93.
28. Kramer, B. 1996. Nampeyo and Her Pottery. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
29. Kramer, Carol. 1985. Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 14:77-102.
30. Lave, Jean. 1991. Acquisition des savoirs et pratiques de groupe. Sociologie et Societes 23(1): 145-162.
31. Lembezat, B. 1961. Les populations paiennes du Nord Cameroun et de l’Adamaoua. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
32. Lemonnier, Pierre. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.
33. Longacre, William A. 1970. Archaeology as Anthropology: A Case Study. Anthropological Papers of the University of Arizona 17. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
34. MacEachern, A. Scott. 1996. Foreign Countries: The Development of Ethnoar- chaeology in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of World Prehistory 10(3):243—304.
35. MacEachern, A. Scott. 1998. Scale, Style and Cultural Variation: Technological Traditions in the Northern Mandara Mountains. In The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. M.T. Stark, ed. Pp. 107—131. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
36. Mahias, M.-C. 1993. Pottery Techniques in India. Technical Variants and Social Choice. In Technological Choices. Transformation in Material Cultures since the Neolithic. P. Lemonnier, ed. Pp. 157—180. London: Routledge.
37. Marriott, A. 1963. Maria: The Potter of San Idelfonso. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
38. Martinelli, B. 1996. Sous le regard de l’apprenti. Paliers de savoir et d’insertion chez les forgerons Moose du Yatenga (Burkina Faso). Techniques et Culture 28:9-47.
39. McGovern, P.E. 1986. Ancient Ceramic Technology and Stylistic Change: Contrasting Studies from Southwest and Southeast Asia. Ceramics and Civilization 2:33-52.
40. Mead, Margaret. 1928. Coming of Age in Samoa. New York: William Morrow.
41. Muller, Jean-Claude. 1993. Les deux fois circoncis et les presque excisees. Ca- hiers d’Etudes Africaines 132(33):531—544.
42. Ocholla-Ayayo, A. 1980. The Luo Culture. A Reconstruction of the Material Culture Patterns of a Traditional African Society. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
43. Olson, J.S. 1996. The Peoples of Africa. An Ethnohistorical Dictionary. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
44. Palsson, G., and A. Helgason. 1999. Schooling and Skipperhood: The Development of Dexterity. American Anthropologist 100(4):908—923.
45. Peckham, S. 1990. From this Earth: The Ancient Art of Pueblo Pottery. Santa Fe, NM: Museum of New Mexico Press.
46. Pelissier, Catherine. 1991. The Anthropology of Teaching and Learning. Annual Review of Anthropology 20:75—95.
47. Peterson, S. 1984. Lucy M. Lewis: American Indian Potter. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
48. Peterson, S. 1987. Pottery by American Indian Women: The Legacy of Generations. New York: Abbeville Press.
49. Pryor, J., and C. Carr. 1995. Basketry of Northern California Indians: Interpreting Style Hierarchies. In Style, Society and Person. Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives. C. Carr and J.E. Neitzel, eds. Pp. 259—296. New York: Plenum Press.
50. Roe, P.G. 1995. Style, Society, Myth, and Structure. In Style, Society and Person, Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives. C. Carr and J.E. Neitzel, eds. Pp. 27-76. New York: Plenum Press.
51. Sackett, James R. 1990. Style and Ethnicity in Archaeology: The Case for Iso- chretism. In The Uses of style in Archaeology. M. Conkey and C. Hastorf, eds. Pp. 32-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Schiffer, Michael B., and James M. Skibo. 1987. Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Current Anthropology 25(5):595-622.
53. Seignobos, C. 1982. Montagnes et Hautes Terres du Nord-Cameroun. Paris: Editions Parentheses.
54. Sillar, B. 1994. Playing with God: Cultural Perceptions of Children, Play and Miniatures in the Andes. Archaeological Review From Cambridge 13(2):47-63.
55. Sterner, J. 1989. Who Is Signalling Whom? Ceramic Style, Ethnicity and Tapho- nomy among the Sirak Bulahay (Cameroon). Antiquity 63:451-459.
56. Strauss, C. 1984. Beyond “Formal– versus “Informal— Education: Uses of Psychological Theory in Anthropological Research. Ethos 12(3):195-222.
57. Trimble, S. 2007. Talking with Clay. The Art of Pueblo Pottery in the 21st Century. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research.
58. Wallaert, Helene. 1999. Potieres et apprenties Vere du Cameroun: Styles techniques et processus d’apprentissage. Techniques et Culture 33:89-116.
59. Wallaert, Helene. 2008. The Way of the Potter’s Mother: Apprenticeship Strategies among Dii Potters from Cameroon, West Africa. In Cultural Transmission and Material Culture. M.T. Stark, BJ. Bowser, and L. Horne, eds. Pp. 178-198. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
60. Wiessner, P. 1983. Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 48(2):253-276.