Performance-based air traffic management: Evaluating operational acceptability

Proceedings of the 7th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, ATM 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 435-442

  Celio, Joseph C ^a   Smith, Elida C ^a  

^a MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; AIR NAVIGATION; AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURE; AVIATION; CONTROL TOWERS; FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER; AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; CENTER FOR ADVANCED AVIATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTS; FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; JOINT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OFFICES; TERMINAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84944755417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. FAA, 2005, FAA Aerospace Forecasts Fiscal Years 2005-2016, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC.
2. JPDO, End State Vision of the Next Generation Air Transportation System, July 2004.
3. Joint Planning and Development Office, December 2004 , Next Generation Air Transportation System (NGATS) Integrated Plan, Washington, DC.
4. Free Flight Steering Committee, November 15, 2002, National Airspace System Concept of Operations and Vision for the Future of Aviation, RTCA, Inc., Washington, DC.
5. Federal Aviation Administration, June 2002, Strategic Vision for the Provision of Air Traffic Services, Version 1.2 (draft), Washington, DC.
6. Internatio nal Air Transport Association, October 2004, One Sky, Global ATM, Volume 1: A Strategic Vision for Future Air Traffic Management, Montreal, Quebec.
7. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Global Air Traffic Management Operational Concept, First Edition, Doc 9854, 2005.
8. Wanke, C., et al., Probabilistic Congestion Management, ATM 2005 Conference.
9. Bolczak, Richard, et al., September 2004, " En Route ATC Sector Position Operations in 2020," American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) 4th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Forum, Chicago, Illinois.
10. Bowen, K., et.al., 2004, User Request Evaluation Tool Operational Description, MTR 04W0000003, The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA.
11. Kirk D.,W. Heagy,M. Yablonski Problem Resolution Support for Free Flight Operations" IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems Volume 2 No. 2 June 2001.
12. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Ta sk Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock and Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Pub. Co.
13. Stein, E. S. (1985). Air traffic controller workload: An examination of workload probe. (Report No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN84/24). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center.
14. Lee, K. K., Kerns, K., & Bone, R. (2001). Deve lopment and validation of the controller acceptance rating scale (CARS): Results of empirical research. In Proceedings of 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Sante Fe, New Mexico.
15. Federal Aviation Adminis tration, (2006). Roadmap for Performance-Based Navigation: Evolution for Area Navigation (RNAV) and Required Navigation Performance (RNP) Capabilities, US Department of Transportation, Washington DC.