Public Participation, Social Equity, and Technology in Urban Governance

Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 35-48

  Sanchez, Thomas W ^a   Brenman, Marc ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Social Justice Consultancy ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944735905     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4169-3.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Baumgarten, J., & Chui, M. (2009). E-government 2.0. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/E-government_20_2408
2. Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2009). The impact of the digital divide on e-government use. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 132-135. doi:10.1145/1498765.1498801.
3. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Munson, S., & Glaisyer, T. (2010). Engaging the public in open government: Social media technology and policy for government transparency. IEEE Computer, 43(11), 60-67. doi:10.1109/MC.2010.325.
4. Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London, UK: Zed Books.
5. Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internetbased participation tools. Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), 397-408. doi:10.1080/026974 59.2010.503432.
6. Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2008). The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science & Public Policy, 35(7), 489-499. doi:10.3152/030234208X329086.
7. Fisher, E. (1999). Low literacy levels in adults: Implications for patient education. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 30(2), 56-61. PMID:10382455.
8. Gill, K. (n.d.). What is the fairness doctrine? Retrieved from http://uspolitics.about.com/od/electionissues/a/fcc_fairness.htm
9. Hargittai, E. (2003). The digital divide and what to do about it. In Jones, D. C. (Ed.), New economy handbook (pp. 821-839). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Hoch, C., Dalton, L. C., & So, F. S. (2000). The practice of local government planning. Washington, DC: International City/County Management Association.
11. Kaiser, E. J., Godschalk, D. R., & Chapin, F. S. Jr. (1995). Urban land use planning (4th ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12. Lanza, V., & Prosperi, D. C. (2009). Collaborative e-governance: Describing and pre-calibrating the digital milieu in urban and regional planning. In
13. Lazarus, W., & Mora, F. (2000). Online content for low-income and underserved Americans: The digital divide's new frontier. Santa Monica, CA: The Children's Partnership. Retrieved from http://www.policyarchive.org/handle/10207/bitstreams/6881.pdf
14. Maher, K., & Belkin, D. (2011, February 16). State plans anger unions. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703312904576146554263530400.html
15. Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Bishop, A. P. (2004). The Internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users. New Media & Society, 6(6), 781-802. doi:10.1177/146144804047513.
16. NASCIO. (2010). Friends, followers, and feeds: A national survey of social media use in state government. Lexington, KY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.nascio.org/publications/documents/NASCIO-SocialMedia.pdf
17. Rainie, L. (2010). Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
18. Servon, L. J. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: Technology, community, and public policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470773529.
19. Servon, L. J., & Nelson, M. K. (2001). Community technology centers: Narrowing the digital divide in low-income, urban communities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 23(3/4), 279-290. doi:10.1111/0735- 2166.00089.
20. Vicente, M. R., & López, A. J. (2010). A multidimensional analysis of the disability digital divide: Some evidence for internet use. The Information Society, 26(1), 48-64. doi:10.1080/01615440903423245.
21. Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 179-225. doi:10.3102/0091732X09349791.
22. Wilson, D. B. (2009). Weaving the Navajo.Net. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 7(2), 425-461.
23. Yancey, A. K., Ory, M. G., & Davis, S. M. (2006). Dissemination of physical activity promotion interventions in underserved populations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31(4), 82-91. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.06.020 PMID:16979472.
24. Evans-Cowley, J. S., & Kitchen, J. (2011). Egovernment (American Planning Association PAS Report No. 564, rev. ed.). Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
25. Silva, C. N. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of research on e-planning: ICTs for urban development and monitoring. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.