Challenging the practice of biodiversity offsets: ecological restoration success evaluation of a large-scale railway project

Landscape and Ecological Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 85-97

  Pöll, Constantin E ^a,b   Willner, Wolfgang ^b,c   Wrbka, Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^c Vienna Institute for Nature Conservation and Analyses   (Austria)

Author keywords

Ecoengineering; Ecological compensation; Environmental impact statement; Renaturation; Restoration ecology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944691199     PISSN: 18601871     EISSN: 1860188X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11355-015-0282-2     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bell SS, Middlebrooks ML, Hall MO (2014) The value of long-term assessment of restoration: support from a seagrass investigation. Restor Ecol 22:304–310
2. Bradshaw AD (1997) What do we mean by restoration? In: Urbanska KM, Webb NR, Edwards PJ (eds) Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–14
3. Essl F, Egger G (2010) Lebensraumvielfalt in Österreich—Gefährdung und Handlungsbedarf. Zusammenschau der Roten Liste gefährdeter Biotoptypen Österreichs. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Klagenfurt
4. Gioria M, Schaffers A, Bacaro G, Feehan J (2010) The conservation value of farmland ponds: predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as a surrogate group. Biol Conserv 143:1125–1133
5. Goncalves B, Marques A, Soares AMVDM, Pereira HM (2015) Biodiversity offsets: from current challenges to harmonized metrics. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:61–67
6. Grayson JE, Chapman MG, Underwood AJ (1999) The assessment of restoration of habitat in urban wetlands. Landsc Urban Plan 43:227–236
7. Hennekens SM, Schamineé JHJ (2001) TURBOVEG, a comprehensive database management system for vegetation data. J Veg Sci 12:589–591
8. Hermann A, Wrbka T (2009) Implications of landscape heterogeneity on ecological values in selected types of agriculture landscapes. Geoscape 4:74–85
9. Hill MO (1979) TWINSPAN: a FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca
10. Hughes FMR, Stroh PA, Adams WM, Kirby KJ, Mountford JO, Warrington S (2011) Monitoring and evaluating large-scale, ‘open-ended’ habitat creation projects: a journey rather than a destination. J Nat Conserv 19:245–253
11. Jäch MA (1994) Rote Listen gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs. In: Gepp J (ed) Rote Liste der gefährdeten Käfer Österreichs (Coleoptera). Grüne Reihe des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie, Band 2, Vienna, pp 107–200
12. Lake PS (2001) On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecol Manag Restor 2:110–115
13. Lockwood JL, Pimm SL (1999) When does restoration succeed? In: Weiher E, Keddy P (eds) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 363–392
14. Loiskandl G (1997) Landschaftsentwicklung und Biodiversität im Südlichen Tullnerfeld. Diploma thesis. University of Vienna
15. Loro M, Arce RM, Ortega E, Marín B (2014) Road-corridor planning in the EIA procedure in Spain. A review of case studies. Environ Impact Assess Rev 44:11–21
16. MacMahon JA, Holl KD (2001) Ecological restoration—A key to conservation biology’s future. In: Soulé ME, Orians GH (eds) Conservation biology: research priorities for the next decade. Island, Washington, pp 363–392
17. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton
18. Maron M, Hobbs RJ, Moilanen A, Matthews JW, Christie K, Gardner TA, Keith DA, Lindemayer DB, McAlpine CA (2012) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biol Conserv 155:141–148
19. Moilanen A, van Teeffelen AJA, Ben-Haim Y, Ferrier S (2009) How much compensation is enough? A framework for incorporating uncertainty and time discounting when calculating offset ratios for impacted habitat. Restor Ecol 17:470–478
20. Morris RKA, Alonso I, Jefferson RG, Kirby KJ (2006) The creation of compensatory habitat: can it secure sustainable development? J Nat Conserv 14:106–116
21. Muller S, Dutoit T, Alard D, Grévilliot F (1998) Restoration and rehabilitation of species-rich grassland ecosystems in France: a review. Restor Ecol 6:94–101
22. Nishimoto T, Hada Y (2013) Twelve years of vegetation change in an artificial marsh after the transfer of plants and hydrological restoration. Landsc Ecol Eng 9:131–142
23. Peterseil J, Wrbka T, Plutzar C, Schmitzberger C, Kiss A, Szerencsits E, Reiter K, Schneider W, Suppan F, Beissmann H (2004) Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrian agricultural landscapes—The SINUS approach. Land Use Policy 21:307–320
24. Pilgrim JD, Brownlie S, Ekstrom JMM, Gardner TA, von Hase A, Kate KT, Savy CE, Stephens RTT, Temple HJ, Treweek J, Ussher GT, Ward G (2013) A process for assessing the offsetability of biodiversity impacts. Conserv Lett 6:376–384
25. Quétier F, Regnery B, Levrel H (2014) No net loss of biodiversity or paper offsets? A critical review of the French no net loss policy. Environ Sci Policy 38:120–131
26. Rainey HJ, Pollard EHB, Dutson G, Ekstrom JMM, Livingstone SR, Temple HJ, Pilgrim JD (2014) A review of corporate goals of no net loss and net positive impact on biodiversity. Oryx 49:232–238
27. Ruiz-Jaen MC, Aide TM (2005) Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restor Ecol 13:569–577
28. Sætersdal M, Gjerde I, Blom HH, Ihlen PG, Myrseth EW, Pommeresche R, Skartveit J, Solhøy T, Aas O (2003) Vascular plants as a surrogate species group in complementary site selection for bryophytes, macrolichens, spiders, carabids, staphylinids, snails, and wood living polypore fungi in a northern forest. Biol Conserv 115:21–31
29. Santi E, Maccherini S, Rocchini D, Boninia I, Brunialti G, Favilli L, Perini C, Pezzo F, Piazzini S, Rota E, Salerni E, Chiarucci A (2010) Simple to sample: vascular plants as surrogate group in nature reserve. Nat Conserv 18:2–11
30. Sauberer N, Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M, Berg H-M, Bieringer G, Milasowszky N, Moser D, Plutzar C, Pollheimer M, Storch C, Tröstl R, Zechmeister H, Grabherr G (2004) Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conserv 117:181–190
31. Schmitzberger I, Wrbka T, Steurer B, Aschenbrenner G, Peterseil J, Zechmeister H (2005) How farming styles influence biodiversity maintenance in Austrian agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:274–290
32. Schneider E, Tudor M, Staraş M (2008) Evolution of Babina polder after restoration works—Agricultural polder Babina, a pilot project of ecological restoration. WWF Germany/DDNI Tulcea
33. Society for Ecological Restoration International Science and Policy Working Group (2004) The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. www.ser.org & Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International
34. Tambosi LR, Martensen AC, Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP (2014) A framework to optimize biodiversity restoration efforts based on habitat amount and landscape connectivity. Restor Ecol 22:169–177
35. Tichý L, Holt J, Nejezchlebová M (2011) JUICE—program for management, analysis and classification of ecological data, 2nd edn. Vegetation Science Group, Masaryk University, Brno
36. Tischew S, Baasch A, Conrad MK, Kirmer A (2010) Evaluating restoration success of frequently implemented compensation measures: results and demands for control procedures. Restor Ecol 18:467–480
37. Tiwary A, Kumar P (2014) Impact evaluation of green–grey infrastructure interaction on built-space integrity: an emerging perspective to urban ecosystem service. Sci Total Environ 487:350–360
38. Urbanska KM (2000) Environmental conservation and restoration ecology: two facets of the same problem. Web Ecol 1:20–27
39. Van Diggelen R, Grootjans AP, Harris JA (2001) Ecological restoration: state of the art or state of the science? Restor Ecol 9:115–118
40. Villarroya A, Puig J (2013) A proposal to improve ecological compensation practice in road and railway projects in Spain. Environ Impact Assess Rev 42:87–94
41. Walker LR, Walker J, del Moral R (2007) Forging a new alliance between succession and restoration. In: Walker LR, Walker J, Hobbs RJ (eds) Linking restoration and ecological succession. Springer, New York, pp 1–18
42. Wiegleb G, Bröring U, Choi G, Dahms H-U, Kanongdate K, Byeon C-W, Ler LG (2013) Ecological restoration as precaution and not as restitutional compensation. Biodivers Conserv 22:1931–1948
43. Willner W (2011) Unambiguous assignment of relevés to vegetation units: the example of the Festuco-Brometea and Trifolio-Geranietea sanguinei. Tuexenia 31:271–282
44. Wortley L, Hero J-M, Howes M (2013) Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restor Ecol 21:537–543
45. Wrbka T, Kiss A, Schmitzberger I, Thurner B, Peterseil J, Zechmeister HG, Moser D, Steurer B, Scholl S, Aschenbrenner G, Pollheimer M, Lughofer S, Matouch S (2002) LANDLEBEN—Erhaltung von Vielfalt und Qualität des Lebens im ländlichen Raum Österreichs im 21. Jahrhundert, Final report. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur, Vienna
46. Wrbka T, Erb K-H, Schulz NB, Peterseil J, Hahn C, Haberl H (2004) Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy 21:289–306
47. Young TP (2000) Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biol Conserv 92:73–83
48. Zechmeister HG, Schmitzberger I, Steurer B, Peterseil J, Wrbka T (2003) The influence of land-use practices and economics on plant species richness in meadows. Biol Conserv 114:165–177
49. Zulka KP, Spitzberger F, Frühauf J (2005) Säugetiere, Vögel, Heuschrecken, Wasserkäfer, Netzflügler, Schnabelfliegen, Tagfalter. Rote Listen gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs: checklisten, Gefährdungsanalysen, Handlungsbedarf. Böhlau, Vienna
50. Zulka KP, Gollmann G, Huemer P (2007) Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Österreichs (Teil 2 Kriechtiere, Lurche, Fische, Nachtfalter, Weichtiere). Böhlau, Vienna