Exergy analysis on solar thermal systems: A better understanding of their sustainability

Renewable Energy

Volumn 85, Issue , 2016, Pages 1328-1333

  Kalogirou, Soteris A ^a   Karellas, Sotirios ^b   Badescu, Viorel ^c,d   Braimakis, Konstantinos ^b  

^a CYPRUS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Cyprus)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

^d ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTS   (Romania)

Author keywords

Exergy analysis; Solar collectors; Solar processes; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

SOLAR COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEATING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EXERGY ANALYSIS; SOLAR PROCESS; SOLAR THERMAL SYSTEMS;

EXERGY;

EXERGY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOLAR POWER; SUSTAINABILITY; THERMAL POWER;

EID: 84944515558     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: 18790682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.037     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Petela R. Exergy of Heat Radiation 1961, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Technology, Silesian Technical University, Gliwice, **.
2. Petela R. Exergy analysis of solar radiation, **. Solar Thermal Sciences and Engineering Applications 2013, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. N. Enteria, A. Akbarzadeh **.
3. Landsberg P.T., Mallinson J.R. Thermodynamic constraints, effective temperatures and solar cells. Coll. Int. sur l'Electricite Solaire 1976, 27-35. CNES, Toulouse.
4. Press W.H. Theoretical maximum for energy from direct and diffuse sunlight. Nature 1976, 264:734-735.
5. Beretta G.P., Gyftopoulos E.P. Electromagnetic radiation: a carrier of energy and entropy. J. Resour. Technol. ASME 2014, 6.
6. Badescu V. Is Carnot efficiency the upper bound for work extraction from thermal reservoirs?. Europhys. Lett. 2014, 106:18006. ** This paper shows that radiation reservoirs are more complex than heat reservoirs since they are characterized by thermal level and geometric factor. Equation Eq. ** **) is an important result.
7. Badescu V. How much work can be extracted from a radiation reservoir?. Phys. A 2014, 410:110-119. ** This paper gives the exergy factor of radiation energy **). Also, more accurate upper bounds for the conversion of radiation energy into work are provided.
8. Badescu V. Maximum reversible work extraction from a blackbody radiation reservoir. Way to closing the old controversy. Europhys. Lett. 2015, 109:40008. ** The paper shows that the Petela-Landsberg-Press and Carnot formulas are particular cases of the present Eq. **. The maximum work rate density obtained from a reservoir associated with Carnot efficiency may be higher, or lower, than that obtained from a radiation reservoir of similar temperature associated with lower reversible conversion efficiency, depending on the ambient temperature.
9. Jafarkazemi F., Ahmadifard E. Energetic and exergetic evaluation of flat plate solar collectors. Renew. Energy 2013, 56:55-63.
10. 2, the exergy efficiency is 5.96%.
11. Fudholi A., Sopian K., Othman M.Y., Ruslan M.H., Bakhtyar B. Energy analysis and improvement potential of finned double-pass solar collector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 75:234-240. ** The optimum energy efficiency is approximately 77% while the exergy efficiency is approximately 15-28%.
12. Oztop H.F., Bayrak F., Hepbasli A. Energetic and exergetic aspects of solar air heating ** systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21:9-83.
13. Khasee N., Lertsatitthanakorn C., Bubphachot B. Energy and exergy analysis of a double-pass thermoelectric solar air collector. Int. J. Exergy 2013, 12**:1-10. ** At a temperature difference of 22.8 °C, the conversion efficiency is 6.17%. The exergy efficiency varies between 7.4% and 8.4%.
14. Bayrak F., Oztop H.F., Hepbasli A. Energy and exergy analyses of porous baffles inserted solar air heaters for building applications. Energy Build. 2013, 57:338-345.
15. Benli H. Experimentally derived efficiency and exergy analysis of a new solar air heater having different surface shapes. Renew. Energy 2013, 50:58-67.
16. Bouadila S., Kooli S., Lazaar M., Skouri S., Farhat A. Performance of a new solar air heater with packed-bed latent storage energy for nocturnal use. Appl. Energy 2013, 110:267-275.
17. Bouadila S., Lazaar M., Skouri S., Kooli S., Farhat A. Energy and exergy analysis of a new solar air heater with latent storage energy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39**:15266-15274. ** Experiments have been conducted under the climate of Tunisia. The daily energy efficiency varied between 32% and 45% while the daily exergy efficiency ranged between 13% and 25%.
18. Golneshan A.A., Nemati H. Exergy analysis of unglazed transpired solar collectors **. Sol. Energy 2014, 107:272-277.
19. Bahrehmand D., Ameri M. Energy and exergy analysis of different solar air collector systems with natural convection. Renew. Energy 2015, 74:357-368.
20. Assari M.R., Tabrizi H.B., Jafari I., Najafpour E. An energy and exergy analysis of water and air with different passage in a solar collector. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2014, 36**:747-754.
21. Said Z., Saidur R., Rahim N.A., Alim M.A. Analyses of exergy efficiency and pumping power for a conventional flat plate solar collector using SWCNTs based nanofluid. Energy Build. 2014, 78:1-9. ** The main result is that the SWCNTs nanofluid reduces the entropy generation by 4.34% and enhances the heat transfer coefficient by 15.33% compared to water as an absorbing fluid.
22. Sarkar J. Performance of a flat-plate solar thermal collector using supercritical carbon dioxide as heat transfer fluid. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2013, 32**:531-543.
23. Kargarsharifabad H., Shafii M.B., Rahni M.T., Abbaspour M. Exergy analysis of a flat plate solar collector in combination with heat pipe. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2014, 8**:39-48.
24. Ooshaksaraei P., Sopian K., Zulkifli R., Zaidi S.H., Sirwan R. Performance of single pass photovoltaic thermal solar collector with bifacial solar cells. Int. Rev. Mech. Eng. 2013, 7**:358-363. ** The best thermal efficiency ** is provided by the bifacial photovoltaic thermal panel with two parallel air streams. The exergy analysis shows that a single air stream panel has the highest exergy efficiency **. The single-path panel design is the best option in case the user is mainly interested in electrical energy. The double-path parallel design is the best option if thermal energy is the dominant desired output energy.
25. Marletta L., Evola G. Thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid photovoltaic/thermal solar collector. Int. J. Heat Technol. 2013, 31**:135-142.
26. Dupeyrat P., Ménézo C., Fortuin S. Study of the thermal and electrical performances of PVT solar hot water system. Energy Build. 2014, 68**:751-755.
27. Buker M.S., Mempouo B., Riffat S.B. Performance evaluation and techno-economic analysis of a novel building integrated PV/T roof collector: an experimental validation. Energy Build. 2014, 76:164-175.
28. Al-Shamani A.N., Yazdi M.H., Alghoul M.A., Abed A.M., Ruslan M.H., Mat S., Sopian K. Nanofluids for improved efficiency in cooling solar collectors - a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 38:348-367.
29. Zhang X., Zhao X., Shen J., Xu J., Yu X. Dynamic performance of a novel solar photovoltaic/loop-heat-pipe heat pump system. Appl. Energy 2014, 114:335-352. ** Several performance indicators have been used such as the basic thermal performance coefficient ** and the advanced performance coefficient **. The mean daily electrical, thermal and overall energetic and exergetic efficiencies of the PV/LHP module were 9.13%, 39.25%, 48.37% and 15.02% respectively, and the average values of COPth and COPPV/T were 5.51 and 8.71.
30. Gholampour M., Ameri M. Energy and exergy study of effective parameters on performance of photovoltaic/thermal natural air collectors. J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans. ASME 2014, 136**. Art. No. 031001-1.
31. Sobhnamayan F., Sarhaddi F., Alavi M.A., Farahat S., Yazdanpanahi J. Optimization of a solar photovoltaic thermal ** water collector based on exergy concept. Renew. Energy 2014, 68:356-365. ** Maximum exergy efficiency is 11.36%.
32. Kamthania D., Tiwari G.N. Photovoltaic thermal air collectors: a review. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2014, 6**. Art. No. 062701.
33. Wu S.-Y., Guo F.-H., Xiao L. A review on the methodology for calculating heat and exergy losses of a conventional solar PV/T system. Int. J. Green Energy 2015, 12**:379-397.
34. Kasaeian A.B., Mobarakeh M.D., Golzari S., Akhlaghi M.M. Energy and exergy analysis of air PV/T collector of forced convection with and without glass cover. Int. J. Eng. Trans. B Appl. 2013, 26**:913-926. ** Simulations have been performed under the climate conditions of Kerman **. The overall energy efficiency of glazed/unglazed systems is about 66%/52%. The overall exergy efficiency for unglazed/glazed systems ranges between 11.2-11.6%/10.5-11.1%.
35. Ceylan I., Ergun A. Thermodynamic analysis of a new design of temperature controlled parabolic trough collector. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 74:505-510.
36. Yadav P., Tripathi B., Kumar M. Exergy, energy, and dynamic parameter analysis of indigenously developed low-concentration photovoltaic system. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, Art. No. 929235. ** The exergy efficiency of the system is in the range from 5.1% to 4.82%, while power conversion efficiency decreases from 7.07 to 5.66%, when concentration ratio changes from 1.85 to 5.17 Suns.
37. Hou H., Yu Z., Yang Y., Zhou C., Song J. Exergy analysis of parabolic trough solar collector. Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sin. 2014, 35**:1022-1028.
38. Padilla R.V., Fontalvo A., Demirkaya G., Martinez A., Quiroga A.G. Exergy analysis of parabolic trough solar receiver. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 67**:579-586. ** An important result is that the inlet temperature of heat transfer fluid cannot be optimized to achieve simultaneously maximum thermal and exergetic efficiency because they exhibit opposite trends.
39. Al-Sulaiman F.A. Exergy analysis of parabolic trough solar collectors integrated with combined steam and organic Rankine cycles. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 77:441-449.
40. Madadi V., Tavakoli T., Rahimi A. First and second thermodynamic law analyses applied to a solar dish collector. J. Non-Equilib. Thermodyn. 2014, 39**:183-197.
41. Liu Q., Zhao L., Zhao W., Wang X. Investigations on the thermal calculation model of semisphere cavity receiver of dish solar system. Jixie Gongcheng Xuebao/J. Mech. Eng. 2014, 50**:128-134.
42. Shanmugam S., Veerappan A.R., Eswaramoorthy M. An experimental evaluation of energy and exergy efficiency of a solar parabolic dish thermoelectric power generator. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2014, 36**:1865-1870. ** The energy and exergy efficiencies were experimentally evaluated in the range 0.94-1.68% and 1.01-1.81%, respectively.
43. Nishi Y., Qi X. Exergy analysis on solar heat collection of three-dimensional compound parabolic concentrator. Int. J. Exergy 2013, 13**:260-280.
44. Jafarian M., Arjomandi M., Nathan G.J. A hybrid solar chemical looping combustion system with a high solar share. Appl. Energy 2014, 126:69-77.
45. Nixon J.D., Dey P.K., Davies P.A. Design of a novel solar thermal collector using a multi-criteria decision-making methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 59:150-159.
46. Yang L., Zhang X., Xu G. Thermal performance of a solar storage packed bed using spherical capsules filled with PCM having different melting points. Energy Build. 2014, 68**:639-646. ** The multiple-type packed bed was found to have a higher energy transfer efficiency but lower exergy transfer efficiency during the melting process.
47. Utlu Z., Aydin D., Kincay O. Comprehensive thermodynamic analysis of a renewable energy sourced hybrid heating system combined with latent heat storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 84:311-325. ** Among the advantages of the system, the authors mentioned the significant decrease of the power consumption of the compressor as well the flexibility and stability of operation, for varying environmental temperature.
48. 2.
49. Fudholi A., Sopian K., Othman M.Y., Ruslan M.H. Energy and exergy analyses of solar drying system of red seaweed. Energy Build. 2014, 68**:121-129. ** By fitting different models to his experimental data, he recognized the Page model as the most accurate. The efficiency of the solar collector ranged between 23 to 80%, with an average drying temperature of 48.6 °C.
50. 2 emissions **.
51. Al-Ali M., Dincer I. Energetic and exergetic studies of a multigenerational solar-geothermal system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 71:16-23. ** The authors concluded that the multigenerational system operation reached a very high energetic efficiency of 78 %, compared to the single generation operation **, under which the efficiency was 16.4 %. The values of the exergetic efficiency were estimated at 36.6 and 26.2 % respectively, with the biggest source of the system irreversibility being the parabolic-trough solar collectors.
52. López-Villada J., Ayou D.S., Bruno J.C., Coronas A. Modelling, simulation and analysis of solar absorption power-cooling systems. Int. J. Refrig. 2014, 39:125-136. ** The authors concluded that for temperatures below 100 °C the ETC is the most suitable technology for SSCA. They also pointed out that although the Goswami-ETC configuration has the best efficiency at 138 °C, due to the difficulty of the ETC operating at this temperature range, the PTC could be the best option for this absorption-power cycle. Lastly, the authors concluded that depending on the priority of the system output **, the Goswami-ETC/PTC and the SSCA configurations are preferable respectively.
53. 2 emissions.
54. Karakilcik M., Bozkurt I., Dincer I. Dynamic exergetic performance assessment of an integrated solar pond. Int. J. Exergy 2013, 12:70-86. ** The solar pond energy efficiency varied from 21.33 to 26.52 % for 1 to 4 collectors installed. The respective values for the exergy efficiency ranged from 20.02 to 23.84 %.
55. Koumi Ngoh S., Ayina Ohandja L.M., Kemajou A., Monkam L. Design and simulation of hybrid solar high-temperature hydrogen production system using both solar photovoltaic and thermal energy. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2014, 7:279-293. ** The production cost of the system was estimated at 5235.45 $/ton of hydrogen.
56. Ahmadi P., Dincer I., Rosen M.A. Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production via solar-boosted ocean thermal energy conversion and PEM electrolysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38:1795-1805. ** The net power output of the system was 102 kW with a hydrogen production rate of 1.2 kg/h. The exergetic efficiency of the system was estimated at around 22 %. The components causing the highest exergy destruction were the condenser and the turbine of the ORC. Moreover, he showed that the increase of the solar radiation intensity leads to the increase of the overall exergy efficiency. Meanwhile, the increase of the ambient temperature increases the efficiency when it is lower than 292 K and it decreases it when it has higher values.
57. Wang J., Yan Z., Zhao P., Dai Y. Off-design performance analysis of a solar-powered organic Rankine cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 80:150-157. ** According to the dynamic model they developed, the system exergy efficiency increases for lower environment temperatures. Therefore, the average exergetic efficiency is maximized in December and minimized in August. However, the maximum net power output of the system is obtained in June and September.
58. 2 of occupied land ** due to their lower land requirements.
59. Rovira A., Montes M.J., Varela F., Gil M. Comparison of heat transfer fluid and direct steam generation technologies for integrated solar combined cycles. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 52:264-274. ** The authors stressed out the importance of minimizing the irreversibility of the solar field and especially of the HRSG, by using the solar heat for evaporating the high pressure level steam but not for preheating it. Furthermore, they concluded that the direct steam generation ** configurations lead to improved performance when compared to HTF configurations.
60. Ruzzenenti F., Bravi M., Tempesti D., Salvatici E., Manfrida G., Basosi R. Evaluation of the environmental sustainability of a micro CHP system fueled by low-temperature geothermal and solar energy. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 78:611-616. ** The authors concluded that the materials and energy used for the construction of the wells counter balances the environmental benefits that originate from the use of non-fossil energy sources. Consequently, he proposed that the concept of such plants is more appealing in the case that already created and abandoned wells are used.
61. Rao W.-J., Zhao L.-J., Liu C., Zhang M.-G. A combined cycle utilizing LNG and low-temperature solar energy. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2013, 60:51-60. ** Through the comparison of the combined cycle against the separate solar ORC and LNG power generation cycles, the authors concluded that for the same power output, the required area of the solar collectors and the heat exchange surface are decreased by 82.2% and 31.7% respectively. However, the proposed system is associated with a larger volume flow rate at the turbine outlet.
62. Sun F., Zhou W., Ikegami Y., Nakagami K., Su X. Energy-exergy analysis and optimization of the solar-boosted Kalina cycle system 11 **. Renew. Energy 2014, 66:268-279. ** The power output of the plant could be as high as 491 kW, with an exergy and energy efficiency of 35.6 and 6.48 % respectively.
63. Nematollahi F., Rahimi A., Gheinani T.T. Experimental and theoretical energy and exergy analysis for a solar desalination system. Desalination 2013, 317:23-31. ** The authors concluded that there is a minimal tower length under which the exergetic efficiency of the system is maximized, and therefore this is the optimal length. They also found out that the efficiency is maximized when the temperature of the inlet air decreases and the diameter of the tower increases.
64. Kumar S., Dubey A., Tiwari G.N. A solar still augmented with an evacuated tube collector in forced mode. Desalination 2014, 347:15-24. ** A thermal model has been developed and used to predict the performance of a solar still under the climate of New Delhi **. The optimum daily energy and exergy efficiencies were as 33.8% and 2.6%, respectively, during typical summer day.