What is the role of independence for visual recognition?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2350, Issue , 2002, Pages 297-311

  Vasconcelos, Nuno ^a   Carneiro, Gustavo ^b  

^a HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

BIOLOGICAL VISIONS; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; RECEPTIVE FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VISUAL RECOGNITION; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84944411099     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47969-4_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. A. Bell and T. Sejnowski. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research, 37(23):3327–3328, December 1997.
2. J. Bergen and E. Adelson. Early Vision and Texture Perception. Nature, 333(6171):363–364, 1988.
3. J. Bergen and M. Landy. Computational Modeling of Visual Texture Segregation. In M. Landy and J. Movshon, editors, Computational Models of Visual Processing. MIT Press, 1991.
4. J. Cardoso. Blind Signal Separation: Statistical Principles. Proceedings of the IEEE, 90(8):2009–20026, October 1998.
5. P. Comon. Independent Component Analysis, A New concept? Signal Processing, 36:287–314, 1994.
6. L. Devroye, L. Gyorfi, and G. Lugosi. A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
7. D. Field. What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Computation, 6(4):559–601, January 1989.
8. I. Fogel and D. Sagi. Gabor Filters as Texture Discriminators. Biol. Cybern., 61:103–113, 1989.
9. D. Hubel and T. Wiesel. Brain Mechanisms of Vision. Scientific American, September 1979.
10. A. Hyvarinen and E. Oja. Independent Component Analysis: Algorithms and Applications. Neural Networks, 13:411–430, 2000.
11. N. Jayant and P. Noll. Digital Coding of Waveforms: Principles and Applications to Speech and Video. Prentice Hall, 1984.
12. D. Knill and W. Richards. Perception as Bayesian Inference. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
13. J. Malik and P. Perona. Preattentive Texture Discrimination with Early Vision Mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7(5):923–932, May 1990.
14. S. Mallat. A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: the Wavelet Representation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 11:674–693, July 1989.
15. B. Olshausen and D. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381:607–609, 1996.
16. M. Porat and Y. Zeevi. Localized Texture Processing in Vision: Analysis and Synthesis in the Gaborian Space. IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engineering, 36(1):115–129, January 1989.
17. J. Portilla and E. Simoncelli. Texture Modeling and Synthesis using Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients. In IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, Fort Collins, Colorado, 1999.
18. D. Sagi. The Psychophysics of Texture Segmentation. In T. Papathomas, editor, Early Vision and Beyond, chapter 7. MIT Press, 1996.
19. A. Sutter, J. Beck, and N. Graham. Contrast and Spatial Variables in Texture Segregation: testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model. Perceptual Psychophysics, 46:312–332, 1989.
20. N. Vasconcelos. Bayesian Models for Visual Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.
21. N. Vasconcelos and A. Lippman. A Probabilistic Architecture for Content-based Image Retrieval. In Proc. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conf., Hilton Head, North Carolina, 2000.