pH tolerance in freshwater bacterioplankton: Trait variation of the community as measured by leucine incorporation

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 81, Issue 21, 2015, Pages 7411-7419

  Bååth, Erland ^a   Kritzberg, Emma ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BACTERIA; PH;

ASYMMETRIC TOLERANCE; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; BACTERIAL COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIOPLANKTONS; LEUCINE INCORPORATION; LOGISTIC EQUATIONS; RESPONSE CURVES;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

BACTERIOPLANKTON; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH RATE; IN SITU MEASUREMENT; LOGISTICS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PH; TOLERANCE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

FRESH WATER; LEUCINE;

BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LAKE; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MICROBIOLOGY; PH; RIVER;

BACTERIA; FRESH WATER; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LAKES; LEUCINE; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; RIVERS;

EID: 84944402361     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02236-15     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Díaz-Raviña M, Bååth E. 1996. Development of metal tolerance in soil bacterial communities exposed to experimentally increased metal levels. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:2970-2977.
2. Fernández-Calviño D, Arias-Estévez M, Díaz-Raviña M, Bååth E. 2011. Bacterial pollution induced community tolerance (PICT) to Cu and interactions with pH in long-term polluted vineyard soils. Soil Biol Biochem 43:2324-2331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.08.001.
3. Lekfeldt JDS, Magid J, Holm PE, Nybroe O, Brandt KK. 2014. Evaluation of the leucine incorporation technique for detection of pollutioninduced community tolerance to copper in a long-term agricultural field trial with urban waste fertilizers. Environ Pollut 194:78-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.013.
4. Aldén Demoling L, Bååth E. 2008. Use of pollution-induced community tolerance of the bacterial community to detect phenol toxicity in soil. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:334-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/07-289R.1.
5. Berg J, Thorsen MK, Holm PE, Jensen J, Nybroe O, Brandt KK. 2010. Cu exposure under field conditions coselects for antibiotic resistance as determined by a novel cultivation-independent bacterial community tolerance assay. Environ Sci Technol 44:8724-8728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es101798r.
6. Pietikäinen J, Pettersson M, Bååth E. 2005. Comparison of temperature effects on soil respiration and bacterial and fungal growth rates. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52:49-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.10.002.
7. Rinnan R, Rousk J, Yergeau E, Kowalchuk GA, Bååth E. 2009. Temperature adaptation of soil bacterial communities along an Antarctic climate gradient: predicting responses to climate warming. Global Change Biol 15:2615-2625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01959.x.
8. Van Gestel NC, Reischke S, Bååth E. 2013. Temperature sensitivity of bacterial growth in a hot desert soil with large temperature fluctuations. Soil Biol Biochem 65:180-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.016.
9. Rousk J, Elyaagubi DJ, Jones DL, Godbold DL. 2011. Bacterial salt tolerance is unrelated to soil salinity across an arid agroecosystem salinity gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1881-1887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.007.
10. Kamble PN, Gaikwad VB, Kuchekar SR, Bååth E. 2014. Microbial growth, biomass, community structure and nutrient limitation in high pH and salinity soils from Pravaranagar (India). Eur J Soil Biol 65:87-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.10.005.
11. Li WKW, Dickie PM. 1987. Temperature characteristics of photosynthetic and heterotrophic activities: seasonal variation in temperate microbial plankton. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2282-2295.
12. Blanck H, Admiraal W, Cleven RFMJ, Guasch H, van den Hoop MAGT, Ivorra N, Nyström B, Paulsson M, Petterson RP, Sabater S, Tubbing GMJ. 2003. Variability in zinc tolerance, measured as incorporation of radio-labeled carbon dioxide and thymidine, in periphyton communities sampled from 15 European river stretches. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00244-002-1258-4.
13. Milenkovski S, Bååth E, Lindgren P-E, Berglund O. 2010. Toxicity of fungicides to natural bacterial communities in wetland water and sediment measured using leucine incorporation and potential denitrification. Ecotoxicology 19:285-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0411-5.
14. Fierer N, Jackson RB. 2006. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:626-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507535103.
15. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. 2009. Pyrosequencingbased assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111-5120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00335-09.
16. Rousk J, Bååth E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG, Knight R, Fierer N. 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J 4:1340-1351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.58.
17. Lindström ES, Kamst-Van Agterveld MP, Zwart G. 2005. Distribution of typical freshwater bacterial groups is associated with pH, temperature, and lake water retention time. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8201-8206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8201-8206.2005.
18. Yannarell AC, Triplett EW. 2005. Geographic and environmental sources of variation in lake bacterial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:227-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.1.227-239.2005.
19. Fierer N, Mores JL, Berthrong TST, Bernhardt ES, Jackson RB. 2007. Environmental controls on the landscape-scale biogeography of stream bacterial communities. Ecology 88:2162-2173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-1746.1.
20. Lindström ES, Feng XM, Granéli W, Kritzberg ES. 2010. The interplay between bacterial community composition and the environment determining function of inland water bacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 55:2052-2060. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.5.2052.
21. Newton RJ, Jones SE, Eiler A, McMahon KD, Bertilsson S. 2011. A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75:14-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00028-10.
22. Ren L, Jeppesen E, He D, Wang J, Liboriussen L, Xing P, Wu QL. 2015. pH influences the importance of niche-related and neutral processes in lacustrine bacterioplankton assembly. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:3104-3114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04042-14.
23. Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems, 3rd ed. Elsevier, New York, NY.
24. Wigington PJ, Davies TD, Tranter M, Eshleman KN. 1992. Comparison of episodic acidification in Canada, Europe, and the United States. Environ Pollut 78:29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(92)90006-V.
25. Laudon H, Köhler S, Bishop KH. 1999. Natural acidity or anthropogenic acidification in the spring flood of northern Sweden? Sci Tot Environ 234:63-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00259-4.
26. Lawrence GB. 2002. Persistent episodic acidification of streams linked to acid rain effects on soil. Atmos Environ 36:1589-1598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00081-X.
27. 2S, and pH profiles of a microbial mat. Limnol Oceanogr 28:1062-1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.6.1062.
28. Maberly SC. 1996. Diel episodic and seasonal changes in pH and concentration if inorganic carbon in a productive lake. Freshw Biol 35:579-598.
29. Tank SE, Lesack LFW, McQueen DJ. 2009. Elevated pH regulates bacterial carbon cycling in lakes with high photosynthetic activity. Ecology 90:1910-1922. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/08-1010.1.
30. Langenheder S, Lindström ES, Tranvik LJ. 2006. Structure and function of bacterial communities emerging from different sources under identical conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:212-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.1.212-220.2006.
31. Bååth E. 1996. Adaptation of soil bacterial communities to prevailing pH in different soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 19:227-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00215.x.
32. Fernández-Calviño D, Bååth E. 2010. Growth response of the bacterial community to pH in soils differing in pH. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:149-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00873.x.
33. Fernández-Calviño D, Rousk J, Brookes PC, Bååth E. 2011. Bacterial pH-optima for growth track soil pH, but are higher than expected at low pH. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1569-1575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.007.
34. Pettersson M, Bååth E. 2003. The rate of change of a soil bacterial community after liming as a function of temperature. Microb Ecol 45:177-186.
35. Pettersson M, Bååth E. 2004. Effects of the properties of the bacterial community on pH adaptation during recolonisation of a humus soil. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1383-1388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.028.
36. Smith DC, Azam F. 1992. A simple, economical method for measuring bacterial protein synthesis rates in seawater using 3H-leucine. Mar Microb Food Webs 6:107-114.
37. Rosso L, Lobry JR, Bajard S, Flandrois JP. 1995. Convenient model to describe the combined effects of temperature and pH on microbial growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:610-616.
38. Scholze M, Boedeker W, Faust M, Backhaus T, Altenburger R, Grimme LH. 2001. A general best-fit method for concentration-response curves and the estimation of low-effect concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:448-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620200228.
39. Petersen DG, Dahlöf I, Nielsen LP. 2004. Effects of zinc pyrithione and copper pyrothione on microbial community function and structure in sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:921-928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1897/03-196.
40. Rousk J, Brookes PC, Bååth E. 2009. Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggests functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1589-1596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02775-08.
41. Slonczewski JL, Fujisawa M, Dopson M, Krulwich TA. 2009. Cytoplasmatic pH measurement and homeostasis in bacteria and archaea. Adv Microb Physiol 55:1-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2911(09)05501-5.
42. - pulse on microbial community structure and function: a vernal pool microcosm study. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81:660-672. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01397.x.