Management Strategies for Bark Beetles in Conifer Forests

Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 555-584

  Fettig, Christopher J ^a   Hilszczański, Jacek ^b  

^a PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Aerial survey; Dendroctonus; Direct control; Indirect control; Insecticides; Ips; Salvage; Sanitation; Scolytus; Semiochemicals

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944402284     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-417156-5.00014-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (259)

1. Agee J.K., Skinner C.N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 211:83-96.
2. Ager A.A., McMahan A., Hayes J.L., Smith E.L. Modeling the effects of thinning on bark beetle impacts and wildfire potential in the Blue Mountains of eastern Oregon. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2007, 80:301-311.
3. Amman G.D. Mountain pine beetle emergence in relation to depth of lodgepole pine bark 1969, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, Research Note INT-RN-96.
4. Amman G.D. Insects affecting lodgepole pine productivity. Management of Lodgepole Pine Ecosystems: Symposium and Proceedings 1975, 310-341. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service, Pullman. D.M. Baumgartner (Ed.).
5. Amman G.D. Potential of verbenone for reducing lodgepole and ponderosa pine mortality caused by mountain pine beetle in high-value situations 1994, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Berkeley, CA, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-150.
6. Amman G.D., Cole W.E. Mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Part 2 1983, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, General Technical Report INT-GTR-145.
7. Amman G.D., McGregor M.D., Cahill D.B., Klein W.H. Guidelines for reducing losses of lodgepole pine to the mountain pine beetle in unmanaged stands in the Rocky Mountains 1977, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, General Technical Report INT-GTR-36.
8. Anderbrant O. A model for the temperature and density dependent reemergence of the bark beetle Ips typographus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1986, 40:81-88.
9. Annila E. Influence of temperature upon the development and voltinism of Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera; Scolytidae). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 1969, 6:161-208.
10. Arnberg W., Wastenson L. Use of aerial photographs for early detection of bark beetle infestations of spruce. Ambio 1973, 2:77-83.
11. Atkins M.D. Behavioral variation among scolytids in relation to their habitat. Can. Entomol. 1966, 98:285-288.
12. Babuder G., Pohleven F., Brelih S. Selectivity of synthetic aggregation pheromones Linoprax and Pheroprax in the control of the bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in a timber storage yard. J. Appl. Entomol. 1996, 120:131-136.
13. Baier P., Pennerstorfer J., Schopf A. PHENIPS-a comprehensive phenology model of Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Scolytinae) as a tool for hazard rating of bark beetle infestation. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 249:171-186.
14. Bakke A. Host tree and bark beetle interaction during a mass outbreak of Ips typographus in Norway. Z. Angew. Entomol. 1983, 96:118-125.
15. Bakke A. Monitoring bark beetle populations: effect of temperature. J. Appl. Entomol. 1992, 114:208-211.
16. Bakke A., Saether T., Kvamme T. Mass trapping of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Pheromone and trap technology. Medd. Nor. Inst. Skogforsk 1983, 38:1-35.
17. Bartos D.L., Amman G.D. Microclimate: an alternative to tree vigor as a basis for mountain pine beetle infestations 1989, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, Research Paper INT-RP-400, Ogden, UT.
18. Becker T., Schröter H. Ausbreitung von rindenbrütenden Borkenkäfern nach Sturmschäden. Allg. Forstztg. 2000, 55:280-282.
19. Bedard W.D., Wood D.L. Suppression of Dendroctonus brevicomis by using a mass-trapping tactic. Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals 1981, 310-341. Plenum, New York. E.R. Mitchell (Ed.).
20. Bedard W.D., Wood D.L., Tilden P.E. Using behavior modifying chemicals to reduce western pine beetle-caused tree mortality and protect trees. Current Topics in Forest Entomology 1979, 159-163. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, General Technical Report WO-GTR-8. W.E. Waters (Ed.).
21. Belanger R.P., Malac B.F. Silviculture can reduce losses from the southern pine beetle 1980, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Combined Forest Research and Development Program, Washington, DC, Agricultural Handbook 576.
22. Bennett D.D., McGregor M.D. A demonstration of basal area cutting to manage mountain pine beetle in second growth ponderosa pine 1980, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula, MT, Forest Pest Management Report FPM 88-16.
23. Bentz B.J. Mountain pine beetle population sampling: inferences from Lindgren pheromone traps and tree emergence cages. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36:351-360.
24. Bentz B.J., Munson A.S. Spruce beetle population suppression in northern Utah. West. J. Appl. For. 2000, 15:122-128.
25. Bentz B.J., Amman G.D., Logan J.A. A critical assessment of risk classification systems for the mountain pine beetle. For. Ecol. Manage. 1993, 61:349-366.
26. Bentz B.J., Régnière J., Fettig C.J., Hansen E.M., Hayes J.L., Hicke J.A., et al. Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 2010, 60:602-613.
27. Billings R.F. Forecasting southern pine beetle infestation trends with pheromone traps. Proceedings on the Symposium on Integrated Control of Scolytid Bark Beetles 1988, 247-255. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. T.L. Payne, H. Saarenmaa (Eds.).
28. Billings R.F., Hynum B. Southern pine beetle: guide for predicting timber losses from expanding spots in East Texas 1980, Texas Forest Service, Lufkin, TX, Circular 249.
29. Bone C., Dragicevic S., Roberts A. Integrating high resolution remote sensing, GIS and fuzzy set theory for identifying susceptibility areas of forest insect infestations. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 2005, 26:4809-4828.
30. Boone C.K., Aukema B.H., Bohlmann J., Carroll A.L., Raffa K.P. Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species. Can. J. For. Res. 2011, 41:1174-1188.
31. Borden J.H. Aggregation pheromones. Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology Vol. 9 1985, 257-285. Pergamon Press, Oxford. G.A. Kerkut, L.I. Gilbert (Eds.).
32. Borden J.H. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles. Insect Pheromone Research, New Directions 1997, 421-437. Chapman & Hall, New York. R.T. Cardé, A.K. Minks (Eds.).
33. Borden J.H., Lindgren B.S. The role of semiochemical in IPM of the mountain pine beetle. Proceedings on the Symposium on Integrated Control of Scolytid Bark Beetles 1988, 247-255. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg. T.L. Payne, H. Saarenmaa (Eds.).
34. Borden J.H., McLean J.A. Pheromone-based suppression of ambrosia beetles in industrial timber processing areas. Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals 1981, 133-154. Plenum, New York. E.R. Mitchell (Ed.).
35. British Columbia (BC) Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations 2012, Available online:, Last accessed: November 19, 2013. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/mountain_pine_beetle/Updated-Beetle-Facts_April2013.pdf.
36. Burnside R.E., Holsten E.H., Fettig C.J., Kruse J.J., Schultz M.E., Hayes C.J., et al. The northern spruce engraver, Ips perturbatus 2011, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland, OR, Forest Insect and Disease Leaflet FIDL 180.
37. Byers J.A. Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2 1995, 154-213. Chapman & Hall, New York. R.T. Cardé, W.J. Bell (Eds.).
38. Byers J.A., Wood D.L., Craig J., Hendry L.B. Attractive and inhibitory pheromones produced in the bark beetle Dendroctonus brevicomis during host colonization: regulation of inter- and intraspecific competition. J. Chem. Ecol. 1984, 10:861-878.
39. Cahill D.B. Cutting strategies as control measures of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine in Colorado. Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests: Symposium Proceedings 1978, 188-191. Washington State University, Pullman. A.A. Berryman, G.D. Amman, R.W. Stark (Eds.).
40. Carroll A.L., Shore T.L., Safranyik L. Direct control: theory and practice. The Mountain Pine Beetle-A Synthesis of Biology, Management, and Impacts on Lodgepole Pine 2006, 155-172. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC. L. Safranyik, B. Wilson (Eds.).
41. Cech T.L., Krehan H. Important and new forest pests in Austria. Workshop on Forest Insect and Disease Survey 1997, 27-36. Pisek, Czech Republic, April 7-10, 1997, VULHM Jiloviště-Strnady. M. Knížek, P. Zahradník, K. Diviš (Eds.).
42. Chou C.-Y., Hedden R.L., Song B., Williams T.M. Using a GIS-based spot growth model and visual simulator to evaluate the effects of silvicultural treatments on southern pine beetle-infested stands 2013, 423-430. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Asheville, NC, General Technical Report SRS-GTR-175. J.M. Guldin (Ed.).
43. Christiansen E., Bakke A. The spruce bark beetle of Eurasia. Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations; Patterns, Causes, Implications 1988, 479-503. Plenum, New York. A.A. Berryman (Ed.).
44. Clarke S.R., Salom S.M., Billings R.F., Berisford C.W., Upton W.W., McClellan Q.C., Dalusky M.J. A scentsible approach to controlling southern pine beetles: two new tactics using verbenone. J. For. 1999, 97:26-31.
45. Coeln M., Niu Y., Führer E. Entwicklung von Borkenkäfern in Abhängigkeit von thermischen Bedingungen verschiedener montaner Waldstufen (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Entomologia Generalis 1996, 21:37-54.
46. Coggins S.B., Coops N.C., Wulder M.A., Bater C.W., Ortlepp S.M. Comparing the impacts of mitigation and non-mitigation on mountain pine beetle populations. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:112-120.
47. Cole W.E., Amman G.D. Mountain pine beetle dynamics in lodgepole pine forests. Part 1: Course of an infestation 1980, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, General Technical Report INT-GTR-89.
48. Cole W.E., Cahill D.B. Cutting strategies can reduce probabilities of mountain pine beetle epidemics in lodgepole pine. J. For. 1976, 74:294-297.
49. Cook S.P., Hain F.P. Toxicity of host monoterpenes to Dendroctonus frontalis and Ips calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 1988, 23:287-292.
50. Coops N.C., Timko J.A., Wulder M.A., White J.C., Ortlepp M.A. Investigating the effectiveness of mountain pine beetle mitigation strategies. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2008, 54:151-165.
51. Coulson R.N., Stephen F.M. Impacts of insects in forest landscapes: implications for forest health management. Invasive Forest Insects, Introduced Forest Trees, and Altered Ecosystems: Ecological Pest Management in Global Forests of a Changing World 2006, 101-125. Springer-Verlag, New York. T.D. Payne (Ed.).
52. DeGomez T., Fettig C.J., McMillin J.D., Anhold J.A., Hayes C.J. Managing slash to minimize colonization of residual leave trees by Ips and other bark beetle species following thinning in southwestern ponderosa pine 2008, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
53. Dimitri L., Gebauer U., Lösekrug R., Vaupel O. Influence of mass trapping on the population dynamic and damage-effect of bark beetles. J. Appl. Entomol. 1992, 114:103-109.
54. Drumont A., Gonzalez R., Dewindt N., Grégoire J.-C., Deproft M., Seutin E. Semiochemicals and integrated management of Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae) in Belgium. J. Appl. Entomol. 1992, 114:333-337.
55. Dubbel V. Überlebensrate von Fichtenborkenkäfern bei maschineller Entrindung. Allg. Forstztg. 1993, 48:359-360.
56. Dubbel V., Dimitro L., Niemeyer H., Vaupel O. Borkenkäferfallen-sinnlos bei Massenvermehrungen?. Allgemeine Forst Zeitschrift für Waldwirtschaft und Umweltvorsorge 1995, 50:258.
57. Eriksson M., Pouttu A., Roininen H. The influence of windthrow area and timber characteristics on colonization of wind-felled spruces by Ips typographus (L.). For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 216:105-116.
58. Fayt P., Machmer M.M., Steeger C. Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers-a literature review. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 206:1-14.
59. Feicht E. Bark beetle hunting dogs. The suitability of dogs to find bark beetle infestations. Forst und Holz 2006, 61:70-71.
60. Fettig C.J. Forest health and bark beetles. Managing Sierra Nevada Forests 2012, 13-22. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Albany, CA, General Technical Report PSW-GTR-237. M. North (Ed.).
61. Fettig C.J., McKelvey S.R. Bark beetle responses to stand structure and prescribed fire at Blacks Mountain Experimental Forest, California, USA: 5-year data. Fire Ecol. 2010, 6:26-42.
62. Fettig C.J., McMillin J.D., Anhold J.A., Hamud S.M., Borys R.R., Dabney C.P., Seybold S.J. The effects of mechanical fuel reduction treatments on the activity of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) infesting ponderosa pine. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 230:55-68.
63. Fettig C.J., Allen K.K., Borys R.R., Christopherson J., Dabney C.P., Eager T.J., et al. Effectiveness of bifenthrin (Onyxô) and carbaryl (Sevin SLô) for protecting individual, high-value conifers from bark beetle attack (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in the western United States. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99:1691-1698.
64. Fettig C.J., Klepzig K.D., Billings R.F., Munson A.S., Nebeker T.E., Negrón J.F., Nowak J.T. The effectiveness of vegetation management practices for prevention and control of bark beetle infestations in coniferous forests of the western and southern United States. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 238:24-53.
65. Fettig C.J., McKelvey S.R., Dabney C.P., Borys R.R. The response of Dendroctonus valens (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and Temnochila chlorodia (Coleoptera: Trogossitidae) to Ips paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) pheromone components and verbenone. Can. Entomol. 2007, 139:141-145.
66. Fettig C.J., Munson A.S., McKelvey S.R., Bush P.B., Borys R.R. Spray deposition from ground-based applications of carbaryl to protect individual trees from bark beetle attack. J. Environ. Qual. 2008, 37:1170-1179.
67. Fettig C.J., McKelvey S.R., Borys R.R., Dabney C.P., Hamud S.M., Nelson L.J., Seybold S.J. Efficacy of verbenone for protecting ponderosa pine stands from western pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) attack in California. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102:1846-1858.
68. Fettig C.J., Reid M.L., Bentz B.J., Sevanto S., Spittlehouse D.L., Wang T. Changing climates, changing forests: a western North American perspective. J. For. 2013, 111:214-228.
69. Fettig C.J., Grosman D.M., Munson A.S. Advances in insecticide tools and tactics for protecting conifers from bark beetle attack in the western United States. Insecticides-Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies 2013, 472-492. InTech, Croatia. S. Trdan (Ed.).
70. Fettig C.J., Gibson K.E., Munson A.S., Negrón J.F. Cultural practices for prevention and mitigation of mountain pine beetle infestations. For. Sci. 2014, 60:450-463.
71. Fettig C.J., Munson A.S., Grosman D.M., Bush P.B. Evaluations of emamectin benzoate and propiconazole for protecting individual Pinus contorta from mortality attributed to colonization by Dendroctonus ponderosae and associated fungi. Pest Manage. Sci. 2014, 70:771-778.
72. Fielding N.J., O'Keefe T., King C.J. Dispersal and host-finding capability of the predatory beetle Rhizophagus grandis Gyll. (Coleoptera, Rhizophagidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 1991, 112:89-98.
73. Franceschi V.R., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Krekling T. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol. 2005, 167:353-376.
74. Gibson K.E., Schmitz R.F., Amman G.D., Oakes R.D. Mountain pine beetle response to different verbenone dosages in pine stands of western Montana 1991, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, Research Paper INT-RP-444.
75. Gilbert M., Nageleisen L.M., Franklin A., Grégoire J.-C. Post-storm surveys reveal large-scale spatial patterns and influences of site factors, forest structure and diversity in endemic bark-beetle populations. Lands. Ecol. 2005, 20:35-49.
76. Gillette N.E., Mehmel C.J., Mori S.R., Webster J.N., Wood D.L., Erbilgin N., Owen D.R. The push-pull tactic for mitigation of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) damage in lodgepole and whitebark pines. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41:1575-1586.
77. Gillette N.E., Wood D.L., Hines S.J., Runyon J.B., Negrón J.F. The once and future forest: consequences of mountain pine beetle treatment decisions. For. Sci. 2014, 60:527-538.
78. Gimbarzevsky P. Remote sensing in forest damage detection and appraisal-selected annotated bibliography 1984, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, BC, Information Report, BC-X-253.
79. Gmelin J.F. Abhandlung über die Wurmtrocknis 1787, Cruisiusschen, Leipzig.
80. Göthlin E., Schroeder L.M., Lindelöw A. Attacks by Ips typographus and Pityogenes chalcographus on windthrown spruces (Picea abies) during the two years following a storm felling. Scand. J. For. Res. 2000, 15:542-549.
81. Graf M., Reid M.L., Aukema B.H., Lindgren B.S. Association of tree diameter with body size and lipid content of mountain pine beetles. Can. Entomol. 2012, 144:467-477.
82. Grégoire J.-C., Evans H.F. Damage and control of BAWBILT organisms, an overview in European bark and wood boring insects in living trees: a synthesis. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 19-37. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H.F. Evans (Eds.).
83. Grégoire J.-C., Merlin J., Pasteels J.M., Jaffuel R., Vouland G., Schvester D. Biocontrol of Dendroctonus micans by Rhizophagus grandis Gyll. (Coleoptera: Rhizophagidae) in the Massif Central (France). A first appraisal of the mass-rearing and release methods. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 1985, 99:182-190.
84. Grégoire J.-C., Raty L., Drumont A., De Windt N. Pheromone mass trapping: does it protect windfalls from attack by Ips typographus L. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)?. Proceedings: Integrating Cultural Tactics into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests 1997, 1-8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Newton Square, PA, General Technical Report NE-GTR-236. J.-C. Grégoire, A.M. Liebhold, F.M. Stephen, K.R. Day, S.M. Salom (Eds.).
85. Grodzki W. GIS, spatial ecology and research on forest protection. GIS and Databases in the Forest Protection in Central Europe 2005, 7-14. Forest Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland. W. Grodzki (Ed.).
86. Grodzki W. Wykorzystanie pułapek feromonowych do monitoringu populacji kornika drukarza w wybranych parkach narodowych w Karpatach (Pheromone traps as a tool for monitoring of Ips typographus in selected national parks in Carpathian Mountains). Prace Instytutu Badawczego Leśnictwa, Rozprawy i Monografie 2007, 8:1-127.
87. Grodzki W. The decline of Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. stands in Beskid Ślaski and Z˙ywiecki: theoretical concept and reality. Beskydy 2010, 3:19-26.
88. Grodzki W., Jakuš R., Lajzová E., Sitková Z., Maczka T., Škvarenina J. Effects of intensive versus no management strategies during an outbreak of the bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) (Col.: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the Tatra Mts. in Poland and Slovakia. Ann. Forest Sci. 2006, 63:55-61.
89. Grodzki W., Kosibowicz M., Maczka T. Skuteczność wystawiania pułapek feromonowych na kornika drukarza Ips typographus (L.) w sasiedztwie wiatrowałów i wiatrołomów (Effectiveness of pheromone traps for ESB in the proximity of windthrows and windbreaks). Leśne Prace Badawcze 2008, 69:365-370.
90. Hamel D.R. Results of harvesting strategies for management of mountain pine beetle infestations in lodgepole pine on the Gallatin National Forest, Montana. Theory and Practice of Mountain Pine Beetle Management in Lodgepole Pine Forests: Symposium Proceedings 1978, 192-196. Washington State University, Pullman. A.A. Berryman, G.D. Amman, R.W. Stark (Eds.).
91. Hansen E.M., Vandygriff J.C., Cain R.J., Wakarchuk D. Comparison of naturally and synthetically baited spruce beetle trapping systems in the central Rocky Mountains. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99:373-382.
92. Harrington T.C., Cobb F.W., Lownsberry J.W. Activity of Hylastes nigrinus, a vector of Verticicladiella wageneri, in thinned stands of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 1985, 15:579-593.
93. Haverty M.I., Page M., Shea P.J., Hoy J.B., Hall R.W. Drift and worker exposure resulting from two methods of applying insecticides to pine bark. Bull. Environ. Contam. Tox. 1983, 30:223-228.
94. Hayes C.J., Fettig C.J., Merrill L.D. Evaluation of multiple funnel traps and stand characteristics for estimating western pine beetle-caused tree mortality. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102:2170-2182.
95. Hedden R.L. Simulation of southern pine beetle associated timber loss using CLEMBEETLE. Integrated Pest Management Research Symposium, Proceedings 1985, 288-291. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, New Orleans, LA, General Technical Report SO-GTR-56. S.J. Branham, R.C. Thatcher (Eds.).
96. Hedgren P.O. The bark beetle Pityogenes chalcographus (L.) (Scolytidae) in living trees: reproductive success, tree mortality and interaction with Ips typographus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2004, 128:161-166.
97. Heller R.C. Previsual detection of ponderosa pine trees dying from bark beetle attack. Forest Science Proceedings, 5th Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment 1968, 387-434. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
98. Hilszczański J. Kora zamarłych świerków jako miejsce zimowania owadzich drapiez˙ników zwiazanych z kambio i ksylofagami (Bark of dead infested spruce trees as an overwintering site of insect predators associated with bark and wood boring beetles). Leśne Prace Badawcze 2008, 69:15-19.
99. Hilszczański J., Gibb H., Hjältén J., Atlegrim O., Johansson T., Pettersson R.B., et al. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonoidea) of saproxylic beetles are affected by forest management and dead wood characteristics in boreal spruce forest. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 126:456-464.
100. Hilszczański J., Janiszewski W., Negrón J., Munson A.S. Stand characteristics and Ips typographus (L.) (Col., Curculionidae, Scolytinae) infestation during outbreak in northeastern Poland. Folia For. Pol., Ser. A 2006, 48:53-65.
101. Hodges J.D., Pickard L.S. Lightning in the ecology of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 1971, 103:44-51.
102. Hodges J.D., Elam W.W., Watson W.F., Nebeker T.E. Oleoresin characteristics and susceptibility of four southern pines to southern pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacks. Can. Entomol. 1979, 111:889-896.
103. Hodges J.D., Nebeker T.E., DeAngelis J.D., Karr B.L., Blanche C.A. Host resistance and mortality: a hypothesis based on the southern pine beetle-microorganism-host interactions. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1985, 31:31-35.
104. Hofstetter R.W., Dunn D.D., McGuire R., Potter K.A. Using acoustic technology to reduce bark beetle reproduction. Pest Manage. Sci. 2014, 70:24-27.
105. Holsten E.H., Werner R.A. Engraver beetles in Alaska forests 1987, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Leaflet, Portland, OR.
106. Holsten E.H., Webb W., Shea P.J., Werner R.A. Release rates of methylcyclohexenone and verbenone from bubble cap and bead releasers under field conditions suitable for the management of bark beetles in California, Oregon, and Alaska 2002, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland, OR, Research Paper PNW-RP-544.
107. Hopkins A.D. The Black Hills beetle 1905, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, Bureau of Entomology, Bulletin 56.
108. Hübertz H., Larsen J.R., Bejer B. Monitoring spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus (L.)) populations under nonepidemic conditions. Scand. J. For. Res. 1991, 6:217-226.
109. Hunt D.W.A., Borden J.H. Conversion of verbenols to verbenone by yeasts isolated from Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16:1385-1397.
110. Hunt D.W.A., Borden J.H., Lindgren B.S., Gries G. The role of autoxidation of α-pinene in the production of pheromones of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. J. For. Res. 1989, 19:1275-1282.
111. Jactel H., Brockerhoff E.G. Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:835-848.
112. Jakuš R. Bark beetle (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) outbreak and system of IPM measures in an area affected by intensive forest decline connected with honey fungus (Armillaria sp.). J. Pest Sci. 2001, 74:46-51.
113. Jakuš R., Blaženec M. Treatment of bark beetle attacked trees with entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) Vuillemin. Folia For. Pol., Ser. A 2011, 53:150-155.
114. Jakuš R., Dudová A. Pokusné použitie agregačných a antiagregačných feromónov proti lykožrútovi smrekovému (Ips typographus) v rozpadávajúcich sa smrekových porastoch so zníženým zakmenením. J. For. Sci. 1999, 45:525-532.
115. Jakuš R., Schlyter F., Zhang Q.-H., Blazenec M., Vavercák R., Grodzki W., et al. Overview of development of anti-attractant based technology for spruce protection against Ips typographus: from past failures to future success. J. Pest Sci. 2003, 76:89-99.
116. Jakuš R., Ježík M., Kissiyar O., Blaženec M. Prognosis of bark beetle attack in TANABBO model. GIS and Databases in the Forest Protection in Central Europe 2005, 35-43. Forest Research Institute, Warsaw. W. Grodzki (Ed.).
117. Jonasova M., Matejkova I. Natural regeneration and vegetation changes in wet spruce forests after natural and artificial disturbances. Can. J. For. Res. 2007, 37:1907-1914.
118. Jonsell M., Weslien J. Felled or standing retained wood-it makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. For. Ecol. Manage. 2003, 175:425-435.
119. Jönsson A.M., Schroeder L.M., Lagergren F., Anderbrant O., Smith B. Guess the impact of Ips typographus-an ecosystem modelling approach for simulating spruce bark beetle outbreaks. Agr. Forest. Meteorol. 2012, 166:188-200.
120. Kenis M., Wermelinger B., Grégoire J.-C. Research on parasitoids and predators of Scolytidae-a review. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 237-290. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H. Evans (Eds.).
121. Kissiyar O., Blaženec M., Jakuš R., Willekens A., Ježík M., Baláž P., et al. TANABBO model-a remote sensing based early warning system for forest decline and bark beetle outbreaks in Tatra Mts.-overview. GIS and Databases in the Forest Protection in Central Europe 2005, 15-34. Forest Research Institute, Warsaw. W. Grodzki (Ed.).
122. Klein W.H., Parker D.L., Jensen C.E. Attack, emergence, and stand depletion trends of the mountain pine beetle in a lodgepole pine stand during an outbreak. Environ. Entomol. 1978, 112:185-191.
123. Klepzig K.D., Raffa K.F., Smalley E.M. Association of insect-fungal complexes with red pine decline in Wisconsin. For. Sci. 1991, 37:1119-1139.
124. Knížek M., Lubojacký J. Podkorní hmyz (Bark beetles). Výskyt Lesních Škodlivých Činitelů v Roce 2011 a Jejich Očekávaný Stav v Roce 2012 2012, 20-30. Zpravodaj ochrany lesa, Supplementum. M. Knížek, R. Modlinger (Eds.).
125. Kobakhidze D.N., Tvaradze M.S., Kraveishvili I.K. Predvaritel'nye rezul'taty k introduktsii, izucheniyu bioekologii, razrabotke metodiki iskusstvennogo razvedeniya i naturalizatsii v elovykh nasazhdeniyakh Gruzii naibolee effektivnogo entomofaga Dendroctonus micans Kugel. Rhizophagus grandis Gyll. Soobshcheniya Akademii Nauk. Gruzinskoi SSR 1970, 60:205-208.
126. Kolb T.E., Guerard N., Hofstetter R.W., Wagner M.R. Attack preference of Ips pini on Pinus ponderosa in northern Arizona: tree size and bole position. Agric. For. Entomol. 2006, 8:295-303.
127. Kolk A., Grodzki W. Metody ograniczania liczebności kornika drukarza (Methods of ESB control). Kornik Drukarz i Jego Rola w Ekosystemach Leśnych 2013, 149-154. CILP. W. Grodzki (Ed.).
128. Komonen A., Schroeder L.M., Weslien J. Ips typographus population development after a severe storm in a nature reserve in southern Sweden. J. Appl. Entomol. 2011, 135:132-141.
129. Kreutz J., Zimmermann G., Marohn H., Vaupel O., Mosbacher G. Preliminary investigations on the use of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. and other control methods against the bark beetle, Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae) in the field. IOBC/WPRS-Bull. 2000, 23:167-173.
130. Kreutz J., Vaupel O., Zimmermann G. Efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. against the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus L. in the laboratory under various conditions. J. Appl. Entomol. 2004, 128:384-389.
131. Król A., Bakke A. Comparison of trap trees and pheromone loaded pipe traps in attracting Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae). Pol. Pismo Entomol. 1986, 56:437-445.
132. Landa Z., Kalista M., Křenová Z., Vojtěch O. Praktické využití entomopatogenní houby Beauveria bassiana proti lýkožroutu smrkovému Ips typographus. Ekologické Metody Ochrany Lesa Před Podkorním Hmyzem" 2008, 62-71. Sborník referátů ze semináře, Sborníky z výzkumu na Šumavě-sešit 1. Správa NP a CHKO Šumava, Vimperk. O. Vojtech, P. Šustr (Eds.).
133. Lekander B. A mass outbreak of Ips typographus in Gästrikland, Central Sweden, in 1945-1952 1972, Department of Forest Zoology, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, Research Notes, 10.
134. Leufvén A., Bergström G., Falsen E. Interconversion of verbenols and verbenone by identified yeasts isolated from the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 1984, 10:1349-1361.
135. Lewis E.E., Cane J.H. Stridulation as a primary anti-predator defence of a beetle. Anim. Behav. 1990, 40:1003-1004.
136. Liebhold A.M., Berck P., Williams N.A., Wood D.L. Estimating and valuing western pine beetle impacts. For. Sci. 1986, 32:325-338.
137. Lieutier F. Host resistance to bark beetles and its variations. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 135-180. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H.F. Evans (Eds.).
138. Lindelöw Å., Schroeder M. Spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) in Sweden: monitoring and risk assessment. J. For. Sci. 2001, 47:39-41.
139. Lindelöw Å., Risberg B., Sjodin K. Attraction during flight of scolytids and other bark and wood-dwelling beetles to volatiles from fresh and stored spruce wood. Can. J. For. Res. 1992, 22:224-228.
140. Lindgren B.S., Nordlander G., Birgersson G. Feeding deterrency and acute toxicity of verbenone to the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. J. Appl. Entomol. 1996, 120:397-403.
141. Lobinger G. Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Borkenkäferfallen. Allg. Forst. Z. 1995, 50:198-201. Waldwirtsch. Umwelvorsorge.
142. Lobinger G., Skatulla U. Untersuchungen zum Einfluss von Sonnenlicht auf das Schwärmverhalten von Borkenkäfern. Anz. Schädl., Pflanzens. Umwelts. 1996, 69:183-185.
143. Lubojacký J., Holuša J. Comparison of spruce bark beetles (Ips typographus) catches between treated trap logs and pheromone traps. Šumarski list br. 2011, 5-6(135):233-242.
144. Mafra-Neto A., de Lame F.M., Fettig C.J., Munson A.S., Perring T.M., Stelinski L.L., et al. Manipulation of insect behavior with Specialized Pheromone & Lure Application Technology (SPLATô). Natural Products for Pest Management 2013, 31-58. ACS Publications, Washington, DC. J. Beck, J. Coats, S. Duke, M. Koivunen (Eds.).
145. Mathews P.L., Stephen F.M. Effect of artificial diet on longevity of adult parasitoids of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 1997, 26:961-965.
146. Mathews P.L., Stephen F.M. Effects of an artificial diet and varied environmental conditions on longevity of Coeloides pissodis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 1999, 28:729-734.
147. McFarlane B.L., Watson D.O. Perceptions of ecological risk associated with mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in Banff and Kootenay National Parks of Canada. Risk Anal. 2008, 28:203-212.
148. McFarlane B.L., Stumpf-Allen R.C.G., Watson D.O. Public perceptions of natural disturbance in Canada's national parks: the case of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins). Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130:340-348.
149. McGregor M.D., Amman G.D., Schmitz R.F., Oakes R.D. Partial cutting lodgepole pine stands to reduce losses to the mountain pine beetle. Can. J. For. Res. 1987, 17:1234-1239.
150. Meigs G.W., Kennedy R.E., Cohen W.B. A Landsat time series approach to characterize bark beetle and defoliator impacts on tree mortality and surface fuels in conifer forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 2011, 115:3707-3718.
151. Mezei P., Jakuš R., Blazenec M., Belanova S., Smidt J. The relationship between potential solar radiation and spruce bark beetle catches in pheromone traps. Ann. For. Sci. 2012, 55:243-252.
152. Mitchell R.G., Waring R.H., Pitman G.B. Thinning lodgepole pine increases the vigor and resistance to mountain pine beetle. For. Sci. 1983, 2:204-211.
153. Müller M., Job H. Managing natural disturbance in protected areas: tourists' attitude towards the bark beetle in a German national park. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:375-383.
154. Negrón J. Estimating probabilities of infestation and extent of damage by the roundheaded pine beetle in ponderosa pine in the Sacramento Mountains, New Mexico. Can. J. For. Res. 1997, 27:1634-1645.
155. Negrón J. Probability of infestation and extent of mortality associated with the Douglas-fir beetle in the Colorado Front Range. For. Ecol. Manage. 1998, 107:71-85.
156. Negrón J.F., Allen K., McMillin J., Burkwhat H. Testing verbenone for reducing mountain pine beetle attacks in ponderosa pine in the Black Hills, South Dakota 2006, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, Research Note RMRS-RN-31.
157. Netherer S., Nopp-Mayr U. Predisposition assessment systems (PAS) as supportive tools in forest management-rating of site and stand-related hazards of bark beetle infestation in the High Tatra Mountains as an example for system application and verification. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 207:99-107.
158. Niemann K.O., Visintini F. Assessment of potential for remote sensing detection of bark beetle-infested areas during green attack: a literature review. CAB Abstracts Working Paper-Canadian Forest Service 2005, (2), iii+14 p., Victoria.
159. Oliver C.D., Larson B.C. Forest Stand Dynamics 1996, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
160. Progar R.A., Blackford D.C., Cluck D.R., Costello S., Dunning L.B., Eager T., et al. Population densities and tree diameter effects associated with verbenone treatments to reduce mountain pine beetle-caused mortality of lodgepole pine. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106:221-228.
161. Progar R.A., Gillette N., Fettig C.J., Hrinkevich K. Applied chemical ecology of the mountain pine beetle. For. Sci 2014, 60:414-433.
162. Puchniarski T.H. Świerk pospolity, hodowla i ochrona (Norway spruce, silviculture and protection). Świerk Pospolity w Praktyce Ochrony Lasu 2008, 163-206. PWRiL Warszawa.
163. Puritch G.S. Nonvisual remote sensing of trees affected by stress: a review. Natural Resources Canada 1981, Canadian Forest Service, Forestry Technical Report, Victoria, BC, BC-X- 30.
164. Raffa K.F., Berryman A.A. Gustatory cues in the orientation of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host trees. Can. Entomol. 1982, 114:97-104.
165. Raffa K.F., Berryman A.A. The role of host plant resistance in the colonization behavior and ecology of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ecol. Monogr. 1983, 53:27-49.
166. Raffa K.F., Phillips T.W., Salom S.M. Strategies and mechanisms of host colonization by bark beetles. Beetle Pathogen Interactions in Conifer Forests 1993, 103-128. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA. T.D. Schowalter, G.M. Filip (Eds.).
167. Rasmussen L.A. Attraction of mountain pine beetle to small diameter lodgepole pines baited with trans-verbenol and alpha-pinene. J. Econ. Entomol. 1972, 65:1396-1399.
168. Raty L., Drumont A., De Windt N., Grégoire J.-C. Mass trapping of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus L.: traps or trap trees?. For. Ecol. Manage. 1995, 78:191-205.
169. Ratzeburg J.T.C. Die Forst-Insecten. 1. Die Käfer 1839, Nicolai, Berlin.
170. Reed D.D., Burkhart H.E., Leushner W.A., Hedden R.L. A severity model for southern pine beetle infestations. For. Sci. 1981, 27:290-296.
171. Reid M.L., Purcell J.R.C. Condition-dependent tolerance of monoterpenes in an insect herbivore. Arthropod Plant Interactions 2011, 5:331-337.
172. Reid R.W., Whiney H.S., Watson J.A. Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue-stain fungi. Can. J. Bot. 1967, 45:1115-1126.
173. Reynolds K.M., Holsten E.H. Classification of spruce beetle hazard in Lutz spruce (Picea X lutzii) stands on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. Can. J. For. Res. 1994, 24:1015-1021.
174. Reynolds K.M., Holsten E.H. Classification of spruce beetle hazard in Lutz and Sitka spruce stands on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. For. Ecol. Manage. 1996, 84:251-262.
175. Romme W.H., Knight D.H., Yavitt J.B. Mountain pine beetle outbreaks in the Rocky Mountains: regulators of primary productivity?. Am. Nat. 1986, 127:484-494.
176. Root R.B. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 1973, 43:95-124.
177. Ross D.W., Daterman G.E. Using pheromone-baited traps to control the amount and distribution of tree mortality during outbreaks of the Douglas-fir beetle. For. Sci. 1997, 43:65-70.
178. Ross D.W., Gibson K.E., Daterman G.E. Using MCH to protect trees and stands from Douglas-fir beetle infestation 2001, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Report FHTET-2001-09.
179. Rudinsky J.A., Michael R.R. Sound production in Scolytidae: stridulation by female Dendroctonus beetles. J. Insect Physiol. 1973, 19:689-705.
180. Rudinsky J.A., Ryker L.C., Michael R.R., Libbey L.M., Morgan M.E. Sound production in Scolytidae: female sonic stimulus of male pheromone release in two Dendroctonus beetles. J. Insect Physiol. 1976, 22:167-168.
181. Safranyik L., Shrimpton D.M., Whitney H.S. Management of lodgepole pine to reduce losses from the mountain pine beetle 1974, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Pacific Forest Research Centre, For. Tech. Rep. 1.
182. Safranyik L., Shore T.L., Moeck H.A., Whitney H.S. Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Biological Control Programmes in Canada 1981-2000 2002, 104-110. CABI, Wallingford. P.G. Mason, J.T. Huber (Eds.).
183. Samalens J.C., Rossi J.P., Guyon D., Van Halder I., Menassieu P., Piou D., Jactel H. Adaptive roadside sampling for bark beetle damage assessment. For. Ecol. Manage. 2007, 253:177-187.
184. Sambaraju K.R., Carroll A.L., Zhu J., Stahl K., Moore R.D., Aukema B.H. Climate change could alter the distribution of mountain pine beetle outbreaks in western Canada. Ecography 2012, 35:211-223.
185. Schelhaas M.-J., Nabuurs G.-J., Schuck A. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Global Change Biol. 2003, 9:1620-1633.
186. Schlyter F. Semiochemical diversity in practice: antiattractant semiochemicals reduce bark beetle attacks on standing trees-a first meta-analysis. Psyche 2012, 268621.
187. Schlyter F., Birgersson G. Forest beetles. Pheromones of non-lepidopteran insects. Associated with Agricultural Plants 1999, 113-148. CABI, Wallingford. R.J. Hardie, A.K. Minks (Eds.).
188. Schlyter P., Stjernquist I., Barring L., Jönsson A.M., Nilsson C. Assessment of the impacts of climate change and weather extremes on boreal forests in northern Europe, focusing on Norway spruce. Clim. Res. 2006, 31:75-84.
189. Schmid J.M., Frye R.H. Stand ratings for spruce beetles 1976, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, Research Note RM-RN-309.
190. Schmid J.M., Mata S.A. Mountain pine beetle-caused tree mortality in partially cut plots surrounded by unmanaged stands 2005, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, Research Paper RM-RP-54.
191. Schmid J.M., Mata S.A., Kessler R.R., Popp J.B. The influence of partial cutting on mountain pine beetle-caused tree mortality in Black Hills ponderosa pine stands 2007, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, Research Paper RMRS-RP-68.
192. Schmidt W.C., Alexander R.R. Strategies for managing lodgepole pine. Lodgepole Pine: The Species and Its Management, Symposium Proceedings 1985, 201-210. Washington State University, Spokane. D.M. Baumgartner, R.G. Krebill, J.T. Arnott, G.F. Weetman (Eds.).
193. Schopf A. Zum Einfluß der Photoperiode auf die Entwicklung und Kälteresistenz des Buchdruckers, Ips typographus L. (Col., Scolytidae). Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 1985, 58:73-75.
194. Sevim A., Gokce C., Erbas Z., Ozkan F. Bacteria from Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and their biocontrol potential. J. Basic Microbiol. 2012, 52:695-704.
195. Shea P.J., Neustein M. Protection of a rare stand of Torrey pine from Ips paraconfusus. Application of Semiochemicals for Management of Bark Beetle Infestations: Proceedings of an Informal Conference 1995, 39-43. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, General Technical Report INT-GTR-318. S.M. Salom, K.R. Hobson (Eds.).
196. Shepherd R.F. Factors influencing the orientation and rates of activity of Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 1966, 98:507-518.
197. Shore J.L., Safranyik L. Susceptibility and risk rating stands for the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands 1992, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Information Report BC-X-336.
198. Shore T.L., Safranyik L., Riel W.G., Ferguson M., Castonguay J. Evaluation of factors affecting tree and stand susceptibility to the Douglas-fir beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 1999, 131:831-839.
199. Shore T.L., Safranyik L., Lemieux J.P. Susceptibility of lodgepole pine stands to the mountain pine beetle: testing of a rating system. Can. J. For. Res. 2000, 30:44-49.
200. Shrimpton D.M. Age- and size-related response of lodgepole pine to inoculation with Europhium clavigerum. Can. J. Bot. 1973, 51:1155-1160.
201. Siitonen J. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxyllic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol. Bull. 2001, 49:11-41.
202. Silverstein R.M., Rodin J.O., Wood D.L. Sex attractants in frass produced by male Ips confusus in ponderosa pine. Science 1966, 154:509-510.
203. Skakun R.S., Wulder M.A., Franklin S.E. Sensitivity of the thematic mapper enhanced wetness difference index to detect mountain pine beetle red-attack damage. Rem. Sens. Environ. 2003, 86:433-443.
204. Skuhravý V. Lýkožrout smrkový (Ips typographus L.) a jeho calamity 2002, Agrospoj, Praha.
205. Smith R.H. Resin quality as a factor in the resistance of pines to bark beetles. Breeding Pest-resistant Trees 1966, 189-196. Pergamon Press, New York. H.D. Gerhold, R.E. McDermott, E.J. Schreiner, J.A. Winieski (Eds.).
206. Smith E.L., McMahan A.J., David L., Beukema S.J., Robinson D.C. Westwide Pine Beetle Model version 2.0: detailed description 2005, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Fort Collins, CO, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Report FHTET 05-06.
207. St.George R.A., Beal J.A. The southern pine beetle: a serious enemy of pines in the South 1929, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, Farmers' Bulletin 1586.
208. Stadelmann G., Bugmann H., Meier F., Wermelinger B., Bigler C. Effects of salvage logging and sanitation felling on bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) infestations. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 305:273-281.
209. Steele R., Williams R.E., Weatherby J.C., Reinhardt E.D., Hoffman J.T., Thier R.W. Stand hazard rating for central Idaho forests 1996, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, General Technical Report INT-GTR-332.
210. Stephen F.P., Browne L.E. Application of Eliminade™ parasitoid food to boles and crowns of pines (Pinaceae) infested with Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Entomol. 2000, 132:983-985.
211. Stephen F.M., Lih M.P. A Dendroctonus frontalis infestation growth model: organization, refinement, and utilization. Integrated Pest Management Research Symposium, Proceedings 1985, 186-194. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, New Orleans, LA, General Technical Report, SO-GTR-56. S.J. Branham, R.C. Thatcher (Eds.).
212. Stephen F.M., Lih M.P., Browne L.E. Augmentation of Dendroctonus frontalis parasitoid effectiveness by artificial diet. Proceedings: Integrating Cultural Tactics into the Management of Bark Beetle and Reforestation Pests 1997, 15-22. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Newton Square, PA, General Technical Report NE-GTR-236. J.-C. Grégoire, A.M. Liebhold, F.M. Stephen, K.R. Day, S.M. Salom (Eds.).
213. Stephens S.L., McIver J.D., Boerner R.E.J., Fettig C.J., Fontaine J.B., Hartsough B.R., et al. The effects of forest fuel-reduction treatments in the United States. Bioscience 2012, 62:549-560.
214. Stevens R.E., McCambridge W.F., Edminster C.B. Risk rating guide for mountain pine beetle in Black Hills ponderosa pine 1980, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO, Research Note RM-RN-385.
215. Szabla K. Praktyczna realizacja strategii ograniczania liczebności kornika drukarza na przykładzie świerczyn Beskidu Ślaskiego i Z˙ywieckiego. Kornik Drukarz i Jego Rola w Ekosystemach Leśnych 2013, 161-175. Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych, Warsaw. W. Grodzki (Ed.).
216. Taylor S.W., Carroll A.L. Disturbance, forest age, and mountain pine beetle outbreak dynamics in BC: a historical perspective. Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions 2004, 41-51. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Information Report BC-X-399. T.L. Shore, J.E. Brooks, J.E. Stone (Eds.).
217. Thistle H.W., Peterson H., Allwine G., Lamb B.K., Strand T., Holsten E.H., Shea P.J. Surrogate pheromone plumes in three forest trunk spaces: composite statistics and case studies. For. Sci. 2004, 50:610-625.
218. USDA Forest Service Areas with tree mortality from bark beetles: summary for 2000-2011 2012, Western U.S.
219. Valkama H., Räty M., Niemelä P. Catches of Ips duplicatus and other non-target Coleoptera by Ips typographus pheromone trapping. Entomol. Fennica 1997, 8:153-159.
220. Vaupel O., Zimmermann G. Orientierende Versuche zur Kombination von Pheromonfallen mit dem insektenpathogenen Pilz Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. gegen die Borkenkäferart Ips typographus L. Anz. Schädl., Pflanzens., Umwelts. 1996, 69:175-179.
221. Vité J.P. The influence of water supply on oleoresin exudation pressure and resistance to bark beetle attack in Pinus ponderosa. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 1961, 21:37-66.
222. Wallin K.F., Raffa K.F. Influence of host chemicals and internal physiology on the multiple steps of postlanding host acceptance behavior of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 2000, 29:442-453.
223. Wallin K.F., Raffa K.F. Host-mediated interactions among feeding guilds: incorporation of temporal patterns can integrate plant defense theories to predict community level processes. Ecology 2001, 82:1387-1400.
224. Waring R.H., Pitman G.B. A simple model of host resistance to bark beetles 1980, Oregon State University, Corvallis, School of Forestry Research Note OSU-RN-65.
225. Waring R.H., Pitman G.B. Modifying lodgepole pine stands to change susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack. Ecology 1985, 66:889-897.
226. Waters W.E. Monitoring bark beetle populations and beetle-caused damage. Integrated Pest Management in Pine-bark Beetle Ecosystems 1985, 141-175. John Wiley & Sons, New York. W.W. Waters, R.W. Stark, D.L. Wood (Eds.).
227. Watson A.C., Sullivan J., Amacher G.S., Asaro C. Cost sharing for pre-commercial thinning in southern pine plantations: willingness to participate in Virginia's pine bark beetle prevention program. Forest Pol. Econ. 2013, 34:65-72.
228. Weatherby J.C., Thier R.W. A preliminary validation of a Douglas-fir beetle hazard rating system, Mountain Home Ranger District, Boise National Forest, 1992 1993, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ogden, UT, Forest Pest Management Report FPM 93-05.
229. Wegensteiner R. Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Beauveria- Arten auf Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 1992, 8:104-106.
230. Wegensteiner R. Laboratory evaluation of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. against the bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). IOBC/WPRS Bull 1996, 19:186-189.
231. Wegensteiner R. Pathogens in bark beetles. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis 2004, 291-313. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. F. Lieutier, K.R. Day, A. Battisti, J.-C. Grégoire, H.F. Evans (Eds.).
232. Wellstead A.M., Davidson D.J., Stedman R.C. Assessing approaches to climate change-related policy formulation in British Columbia's forest sector: the case of the mountain pine beetle epidemic. BC J. Ecosyst. Manag. 2006, 7:1-9.
233. Wermelinger B. Ecology and management of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus-a review of recent research. For. Ecol. Manage. 2004, 202:67-82.
234. Wermelinger B., Seifert M. Temperature dependent reproduction on the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus, and analysis of the potential population growth. Ecol. Ent. 1999, 24:103-110.
235. Weslien J. The arthropod complex associated with Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae): species composition, phenology, and impact on bark beetle productivity. Entomol. Fennica 1992, 3:205-213.
236. Weslien J. Monitoring Ips typographus (L.) populations and forecasting damage. J. Appl. Entomol. 1992, 114:338-340.
237. Weslien J., Lindelöw Å. Recapture of marked spruce beetle Ips typographus (L.) in pheromone traps using area-wide mass trapping. Can. J. For. Res. 1990, 20:1786-1790.
238. Weslien J., Regnander J. Colonization densities and offspring production in the bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) in standing spruce trees. J. Appl. Entomol. 1990, 109:358-366.
239. Weslien J., Annila E., Bakke A., Bejer B., Eidmann H.H., Narvestad K., et al. Estimating risks for spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus (L.)) damage using pheromone-baited traps and trees. Scand. J. For. Res. 1989, 4:87-98.
240. White J.C., Wulder M.A., Brooks D., Reich R., Wheate R. Mapping mountain pine beetle infestation with high spatial resolution imagery. For. Chron. 2004, 80:743-745.
241. Whitehead R.J., Russo G.L. "Beetle-proofed" lodgepole pine stands in interior British Columbia have less damage from mountain pine beetle 2005, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Information Report BC-X-402.
242. Whitehead R.J., Safranyik L., Russo G., Shore T.L., Carroll A.L. Silviculture to reduce landscape and stand susceptibility to the mountain pine beetle. Mountain Pine Beetle Symposium: Challenges and Solutions 2004, 233-244. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Information Report BC-X-399. T.L. Shore, J.E. Brooks, J.E. Stone (Eds.).
243. Wichmann L., Ravn H.P. The spread of Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) attacks following heavy windthrow in Denmark, analysed using GIS. For. Ecol. Manage. 2001, 148:31-39.
244. Wickman B.E. The battle against bark beetles in Crater Lake National Park: 1925-34 1987, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland, OR, General Technical Report PNW-GTR-259.
245. Wood D.L. Selection and colonization of ponderosa pine by bark beetles. Insect/Plant Relationships 1972, 101-117. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. H.F. van Emden (Ed.).
246. Wood D.L. The role of pheromones, kairomones and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 1982, 27:411-446.
247. Wulder M.A., Dymond C.C., Erickson B. Detection and monitoring of the mountain pine beetle 2004, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC, Information Report BC-X-398.
248. Wulder M.A., Skakun R.S., Dymond C.C., Kurz W.A., White J.C. Characterization of the diminishing accuracy in detecting forest insect damage over time. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 2005, 31:421-431.
249. Wulder M.A., Dymond C.C., White J.C., Erickson B. Detection, mapping, and monitoring of the mountain pine beetle. The Mountain Pine Beetle-A Synthesis of Biology, Management, and Impacts on Lodgepole Pine 2006, 123-154. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, BC. L. Safranyik, B. Wilson (Eds.).
250. Wulder M.A., Dymond C.C., White J.C., Leckie D.G., Carroll A.L. Surveying mountain pine beetle damage of forests: a review of remote sensing opportunities. For. Ecol. Manage. 2006, 221:27-41.
251. Wulder M.A., White J.C., Carroll A.L., Coops N.C. Challenges for the operational detection of mountain pine beetle green attack with remote sensing. For. Chron. 2009, 85:32-38.
252. Yan Z.-G., Sun J., Owen D., Zhang Z. The red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Scolytidae): an exotic invasive pest of pine in China. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14:1735-1760.
253. Yang Z.-Q., Wand X.-Y., Zhang Y.-N. Recent advances in biological control of important native and invasive forest pests in China. Bio. Control 2014, 68:117-128.
254. Yüksel B. Mass-rearing of Rhizophagus grandis (Gyll.) for the biological control of Dendroctonus micans (Kug.). Orman Fakültesi Seminer Trabzon 1996, 1:133-141.
255. Zahradník P., Knížek M., Kapitola P. Zpětné odchyty značených lýkožroutu smrkových (Ips typographus L.) do feromonových lapačů v podmínkach smrkového a dubového porostu. Zpravy Lesnickeho Vyzkumu 1993, 38:28-34.
256. Zahradník P., Švestka M., Novák V., Knížek M. Podkorní škůdci. Praktické Metody v Ochraně Lesa" 1996, 2:118-144. Silva Regina, Praha. M. Švestka, R. Hochmut, V. Jančařík (Eds.).
257. Zhang Q.-H., Schlyter F. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles. Agric. For. Entomol. 2004, 6:1-19.
258. Zolubas P. Spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) risk based on individual tree parameters. IUFRO Kanazawa 2003 Forest Insect Population Dynamics and Host Influences, Proceeding 2003, 92-93.
259. Zumr V. The data for the prognosis of spring swarming of main species of bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) on the spruce (Picea excelsa). Z. Angew. Entomol. 1982, 93:305-320.