E-MAGINE: The development of an evaluation method to assess groupware applications

Proceedings of the Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WETICE

Volumn 2003-January, Issue , 2003, Pages 153-158

  Huis In 't Veld, M A A ^a   Andriessen, J H E ^a   Verburg, R M ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Application software; Collaboration; Collaborative software; Collaborative work; Conferences; Instruments; Internet; Technological innovation; Technology management; Virtual groups

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; GROUPWARE; INSTRUMENTS; INTERNET;

COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE SOFTWARES; COLLABORATIVE WORK; CONFERENCES; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENTS; VIRTUAL GROUP;

APPLICATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 84944391112     PISSN: 15244547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ENABL.2003.1231400     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Andriessen, J.H. Erik. Working with Groupware. Understanding and Evaluating Collaboration Technology. Springer Verlag, London, 2002.
2. Beyer, H. and K. Holtzblatt. Contextual design: Defining Customer-centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998.
3. Bevan, N. Measuring usability as quality in use. Journal of Software Quality, 4, 1995, pp. 115-140.
4. Block, P. Flawless Consulting: A guide to getting your expertise used. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer Publishers, San Fransisco, 2000.
5. Carroll, J. M. Introduction: the scenario perspective on system development. In: J. M. Carroll (Ed.) Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, 1995.
6. DeSanctis, G., and M.S. Poole. "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory." Organization Science, 5(2), 1994, pp. 121-147.
7. Grudin, J. Groupware and Social Dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 1994, pp. 92-105.
8. Kirakowski, J. MUMMS. Measuring the Usability of Multi-Media Software. http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/mumms/index.html (accessed: May 2003).
9. Kirakowski, J. SUMI. The de facto industry standard evaluation questionnaire for assessing quality of use of software by end users. http://www.ucc.ie/hfrg/questionnaires/sumi/index.html (accessed: May 2003).
10. Kurland, T and P. Barber. User requirements from a Group Perspective: The Case of Distance Learning Mediated by Computer Conferencing. In: P. Thomas (Ed.). CSCW Requirements and Evaluation. Springer, London, 1994.
11. Knutilla, A.J., M.P.Steves, and R.H. Allen. Workshop on Evaluating Collaborative Enterprises - Workshop Report. Proceedings of Ninth IEEE WETICE 2000 Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, Gaithersburg, Maryland, June 14-16, 2000.
12. Lave, J. and E. Wenger. Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
13. Pinelle, D., and C. Gutwin. A Review of Groupware Evaluations. Proceedings of Ninth IEEE WETICE 2000 Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, Gaithersburg, Maryland, June 14-16, 2000.
14. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press, New York, 1995.
15. Yin, R. K. Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, California, 1994.