Inattention blindness in surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 3184-3189

  Hughes Hallett, Archie ^a   Mayer, Erik K ^a   Marcus, Hani J ^a,b   Pratt, Philip ^b   Mason, Sam ^a   Darzi, Ara W ^a,b   Vale, Justin A ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Cognitive load; Inattention blindness; Laparoscopic; Safety; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BLINDNESS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOREIGN BODY; HUMAN; INATTENTION BLINDNESS; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL SWAB; SUTURE; VIDEORECORDING; VISION; ADULT; BURNOUT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COGNITION; ETIOLOGY; FEMALE; MALE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; SURGEON; SURGERY; WORKLOAD;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BURNOUT, PROFESSIONAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; SURGEONS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; VIDEO RECORDING; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84944313127     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4051-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Mack A, Rock I (1998) Inattentional blindness, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
2. Simons DJ, Chabris CF (1999) Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28:1059–1074
3. Dixon BJ, Daly MJ, Chan H, Vescan AD, Witterick IJ, Irish JC (2013) Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention. Surg Endosc 27:454–461
4. Williams LJ (1982) Cognitive load and the functional field of view. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 24:683–692
5. Fadden S, Wickens CD, Vevers P (2000) Costs and benefits of head up displays: an attention perspective and a meta analysis. World Aviat Congr
6. Fischer E, Haines R (1980) Cognitive issues in head-up displays. NASA Tech Pap 1711
7. Mccann RS, Foyle DC (1993) Attentional limitations with heads up displays. In: Jensen R (ed) Proceedings of Seventh International Symposium. Aviat Psychol. pp 70–75
8. Cartwright-Finch U, Lavie N (2007) The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Cognition 102:321–340. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.002
9. Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Marcus HJ, Cundy TP, Pratt PJ, Parston G, Vale J, Darzi AW (2014) Quantifying innovation in surgery. Ann Surg 260:205–211
10. Pratt P, Mayer E, Vale J, Cohen D, Edwards E, Darzi A, Yang G-Z (2012) An effective visualisation and registration system for image-guided robotic partial nephrectomy. J Robot Surg 6:23–31
11. Hart S, Staveland L (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock A, Meshkati N (eds) Human Mental Workload. North Holland Press, Amsterdam, pp 139–183
12. Healey AN, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA (2006) Measuring intra-operative interference from distraction and interruption observed in the operating theatre. Ergonomics 49:589–604
13. Guru KA, Esfahani ET, Raza SJ, Bhat R, Wang K, Hammond Y, Wilding G, Peabody JO, Chowriappa AJ (2014) Cognitive skills assessment during robot-assisted surgery: separating wheat from chaff. BJU Int 115:166–174
14. Wickens CD, Alexander AL (2009) Attentional tunneling and task management in synthetic vision displays. Int J Aviat Psychol 19:182–199
15. Liu D, Jenkins SA, Sanderson PM, Watson MO, Leane T, Kruys A, Russell WJ (2009) Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer. Anesth Analg 109:1135–1146
16. Bressan P, Pizzighello S (2008) The attentional cost of inattentional blindness. Cognition 106:370–383
17. Lavie N (2005) Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load. Trends Cogn Sci 9:75–82