Performance measures for dynamic environments

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2439, Issue , 2002, Pages 64-73

  Weicker, Karsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ACCURACY LEVEL; CO-ORDINATE TRANSFORMATION; DYNAMIC ADAPTATIONS; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; DYNAMIC PROBLEM; FITNESS VALUES; NON-STATIONARY ENVIRONMENT; PERFORMANCE MEASURE;

HEALTH;

EID: 84944312646     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45712-7_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Angeline, P. J. (1997). Tracking extrema in dynamic environments. In P. J. Angeline, R. G. Reynolds, J. R. McDonnell, & R. Eberhart (Eds.), Evolutionary Programming VI (pp. 335–345). Berlin: Springer. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1213)
2. Branke, J. (1999). Evolutionary algorithms for dynamic optimization problems: A survey (Tech. Rep. No. 387). Karlsruhe, Germany: Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe.
3. Cobb, H. G. (1990). An investigation into the use of hypermutation as an adaptive operator in genetic algorithms having continuous, time-dependent nonstationary environments (Tech. Rep. No. 6760 (NLR Memorandum)). Washington, D.C.: Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence.
4. Collard, P., Escazut, C., & Gaspar, A. (1997). An evolutionary approach for time dependant optimization. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 6 (4), 665–695.
5. Dasgupta, D., & McGregor, D. R. (1992). Nonstationary function optimization using the structured genetic algorithm. In R. Männer & B. Manderick (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2 (Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Brussels 1992) (pp. 145–154). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
6. De Jong, K. (2000). Evolving in a changing world. In Z. Ras & A. Skowron (Eds.), Foundation of intelligent systems (pp. 513–519). Berlin: Springer.
7. De Jong, K. A. (1975). An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
8. Feng, W., Brune, T., Chan, L., Chowdhury, M., Kuek, C. K., & Li, Y. (1997). Benchmarks for testing evolutionary algorithms (Tech. Rep. No. CSC-97006). Glasgow, UK: Center for System and Control, University of Glasgow.
9. Goldberg, D. E., & Smith, R. E. (1987). Nonstationary function optimization using genetic algorithms with dominance and diploidy. In J. J. Grefenstette (Ed.), Proc. of the Second Int. Conf. on Genetic Algorithms (pp. 59–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Grefenstette, J. J. (1992). Genetic algorithms for changing environments. In R. Männer & B. Manderick (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 2 (Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Brussels 1992) (pp. 137–144). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. Grefenstette, J. J. (1999). Evolvability in dynamic fitness landscapes: a genetic algorithm approach. In 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 2031–2038). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.
12. Hadad, B. S., & Eick, C. F. (1997). Supporting polyploidy in genetic algorithms using dominance vectors. In P. J. Angeline, R. G. Reynolds, J. R. McDonnell, & R. Eberhart (Eds.), Evolutionary Programming VI (pp. 223–234). Berlin: Springer. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1213)
13. Lewis, J., Hart, E., & Ritchie, G. (1998). A comparison of dominance mechanisms and simple mutation on non-stationary problems. In A. E. Eiben, T. Bäck, M. Schoenauer, & H.-P. Schwefel (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN V (pp. 139–148). Berlin: Springer. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1498)
14. Mori, N., Kita, H., & Nishikawa, Y. (1996). Adaptation to a changing environment by means of the thermodynamical genetic algorithm. In H. Voigt, W. Ebeling, & I. Rechenberg (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN IV (Berlin, 1996) (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1141) (pp. 513–522). Berlin: Springer.
15. Mori, N., Kita, H., & Nishikawa, Y. (1998). Adaptation to a changing environment by means of the feedback thormodynamical geentic algorithm. In A. E. Eiben, T. Bäck, M. Schoenauer, & H.-P. Schwefel (Eds.), Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN V (pp. 149–158). Berlin: Springer. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1498)
16. Salomon, R., & Eggenberger, P. (1997). Adaptation on the evolutionary time scale: A working hypothesis and basic experiments. In J.-K. Hao, E. Lutton, E. Ronald, M. Schoenauer, & D. Snyders (Eds.), Artificial Evolution: Third European Conf., AE’97 (pp. 251–262). Berlin: Springer.
17. Trojanowski, K., & Michalewicz, Z. (1999). Searching for optima in non-stationary environments. In 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 1843–1850). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.
18. Vavak, F., Fogarty, T. C., & Jukes, K. (1996). A genetic algorithm with variable range of local search for adaptive control of the dynamic systems. In Proc. of the 2nd Int. Mendelian Conf. on Genetic Algorithms. ?
19. Weicker, K. (2000). An analysis of dynamic severity and population size. In M. Schoenauer, K. Deb, G. Rudolph, X. Yao, E. Lutton, J. J. Merelo, & H.-P. Schwefel (Eds.), Parallel problem solving from nature – PPSN VI (pp. 159–168). Berlin: Springer.
20. Weicker, K., & Weicker, N. (1999). On evolution strategy optimization in dynamic environments. In 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 2039–2046). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Service Center.