메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 45, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 3269-3279

Minimal clinically important difference on the Beck Depression Inventory-II according to the patient's perspective

Author keywords

2nd edition (BDI II); Beck Depression Inventory; depression; minimal clinically important difference; outcome assessment; primary care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, TREATMENT-RESISTANT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STANDARDS;

EID: 84944278446     PISSN: 00332917     EISSN: 14698978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291715001270     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (214)

References (26)
  • 8
    • 79955858478 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Clinical Global Impression Scale and the influence of patient or staff perspective on outcome
    • Forkmann T, Scherer A, Boecker M, Pawelzik M, Jostes R, Gauggel S (2011). The Clinical Global Impression Scale and the influence of patient or staff perspective on outcome. BMC Psychiatry 11, 83.
    • (2011) BMC Psychiatry , vol.11 , pp. 83
    • Forkmann, T.1    Scherer, A.2    Boecker, M.3    Pawelzik, M.4    Jostes, R.5    Gauggel, S.6
  • 12
  • 13
    • 0026081811 scopus 로고
    • Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research
    • Jacobson NS, Truax P (1991). Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59, 12-19.
    • (1991) Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , vol.59 , pp. 12-19
    • Jacobson, N.S.1    Truax, P.2
  • 14
    • 0024852022 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
    • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989). Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 10, 407-415.
    • (1989) Controlled Clinical Trials , vol.10 , pp. 407-415
    • Jaeschke, R.1    Singer, J.2    Guyatt, G.H.3
  • 15
    • 41449092809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: A comparison of five different methods
    • Kelly MJ, Dunstan FD, Lloyd K, Fone DL (2008). Evaluating cutpoints for the MHI-5 and MCS using the GHQ-12: a comparison of five different methods. BMC Psychiatry 8, 10.
    • (2008) BMC Psychiatry , vol.8 , pp. 10
    • Kelly, M.J.1    Dunstan, F.D.2    Lloyd, K.3    Fone, D.L.4
  • 17
    • 0006407254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • WinBUGS-A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility
    • Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D (2000). WinBUGS-A Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 10, 325-337.
    • (2000) Statistics and Computing , vol.10 , pp. 325-337
    • Lunn, D.J.1    Thomas, A.2    Best, N.3    Spiegelhalter, D.4
  • 19
    • 84907424687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal clinically important difference: Defining what really matters to patients
    • McGlothlin AE, Lewis RJ (2014). Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. Journal of the American Medical Association 312, 1342-1343.
    • (2014) Journal of the American Medical Association , vol.312 , pp. 1342-1343
    • McGlothlin, A.E.1    Lewis, R.J.2
  • 20
    • 78149359722 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Defining successful treatment outcome in depression using the PHQ-9: A comparison of methods
    • McMillan D, Gilbody S, Richards D (2010). Defining successful treatment outcome in depression using the PHQ-9: a comparison of methods. Journal of Affective Disorders 127, 122-129.
    • (2010) Journal of Affective Disorders , vol.127 , pp. 122-129
    • McMillan, D.1    Gilbody, S.2    Richards, D.3
  • 21
    • 13444272147 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • British Psychological Society and Royal College of Psychiatrists: Leicester and London [full guideline]
    • NCCMH (2004). Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care. British Psychological Society and Royal College of Psychiatrists: Leicester and London [full guideline].
    • (2004) Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care
    • NCCMH1
  • 23
    • 33645311528 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The inconsistency of 'optimal' cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve
    • Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF (2006). The inconsistency of 'optimal' cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. American Journal of Epidemiology 163, 670-675.
    • (2006) American Journal of Epidemiology , vol.163 , pp. 670-675
    • Perkins, N.J.1    Schisterman, E.F.2
  • 24
    • 43149113672 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: An evaluation
    • Vanheule S, Desmet M, Groenvynck H, Rosseel Y, Fontaine J (2008). The factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: an evaluation. Assessment 15, 177-187.
    • (2008) Assessment , vol.15 , pp. 177-187
    • Vanheule, S.1    Desmet, M.2    Groenvynck, H.3    Rosseel, Y.4    Fontaine, J.5
  • 25
    • 0142011899 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? the case of the SF-6D
    • Walters SJ, Brazier JE (2003). What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D. Health and Quality Life Outcomes 1, 4.
    • (2003) Health and Quality Life Outcomes , vol.1 , pp. 4
    • Walters, S.J.1    Brazier, J.E.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.