A dynamic logic for the formal verification of java card programs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2041, Issue , 2001, Pages 6-24

  Beckert, Bernhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATIONS; COMPUTER CIRCUITS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); FORMAL VERIFICATION; SMART CARDS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

DYNAMIC LOGIC; JAVA CARD; PROGRAM LOGIC; REAL-WORLD; SEQUENT CALCULUS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; SOFTWARE VERIFICATION;

JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE;

EID: 84944238972     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45165-x_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. W. Ahrendt, T. Baar, B. Beckert, M. Giese, E. Habermalz, R. Hähnle, W. Menzel, and P. H. Schmitt. The Ke Y approach: Integrating object oriented design and formal verification. In M. Ojeda-Aciego, I. P. de Guzman, G. Brewka, and L. M. Pereira, editors, Proceedings, Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA), Malaga, Spain, LNCS 1919. Springer, 2000.
2. J. Alves-Foss, editor. Formal Syntax and Semantics ofJava. LNCS 1523. Springer, 1999.
3. K. R. Apt. Ten years of Hoare logic: A survey – part I. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1981.
4. T. Baar. Experiences with the UML/OCL-approach to precise software modeling: A report from practice. Available at i12www.ira.uka.de/˜key, 2000.
5. E. Börger and W. Schulte. A programmer friendly modular definition of the semantics of Java. In Alves-Foss [2], pages 353–404.
6. C. Calcagno, S. Ishtiaq, and P. W. O’Hearn. Semantic analysis of pointer aliasing, allocation and disposal in Hoare logic. In Proceedings, International Conference on Principles and Practice ofDe clarative Programming, Montreal, Canada. ACM, 2000.
7. E. Clarke and J. M. Wing. Formal methods: State of the art and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(4):626–643, 1996.
8. D. L. Dill and J. Rushby. Acceptance of formal methods: Lessons from hardware design. IEEE Computer, 29(4):23–24, 1996. Part of: Hossein Saiedian (ed.). An Invitation to Formal Methods. Pages 16–30.
9. J. Gosling, B. Joy, G. Steele, and G. Bracha. The Java Language Specification. Addison Wesley, second edition, 2000.
10. M. G. Hinchey and J. P. Bowen, editors. Applications of Formal Methods. Prentice Hall, 1995.
11. M. Huisman and B. Jacobs. Java program verification via a Hoare logic with abrupt termination. In Proceedings, Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE), Berlin, Germany, LNCS 1783. Springer, 2000.
12. D. Hutter, B. Langenstein, C. Sengler, J. H. Siekmann, and W. Stephan. Deduction in the Verification Support Environment (VSE). In M.-C. Gaudel and J. Woodcock, editors, Proceedings, International Symposium ofF ormal Methods Europe (FME), Oxford, UK, LNCS 1051. Springer, 1996.
13. B. Jacobs, J. van den Berg, M. Huisman, M. van Berkum, U. Hensel, and H. Tews. Reasoning about Java classes (preliminary report). In Proceedings, Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), pages 329–340. ACM Press, 1998.
14. D. Kozen and J. Tiuryn. Logic of programs. In J. van Leeuwen, editor, Handbook ofThe oretical Computer Science, volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, chapter 14, pages 789–840. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990.
15. J. Martin and J. J. Odell. Object-Oriented Methods: A Foundation, UML Edition. Prentice-Hall, 1997.