Novel survey disseminated through twitter supports its utility for networking, disseminating research, advocacy, clinical practice and other professional goals

Journal of the Canadian Urological Association

Volumn 9, Issue 9-10 October, 2015, Pages E713-E717

  Borgmann, Hendrik ^a   Dewitt, Sasha ^b   Tsaur, Igor ^a   Haferkamp, Axel ^a   Loeb, Stacy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944210677     PISSN: 19116470     EISSN: 19116470     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3014     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C, et al. Use of social media in urology: Data from the American Urological Association. BJU Int 2014;113:993-8.
2. Loeb S, Bayne CE, Frey C, et al. On behalf of the American Urological Association Social Media Work Group. Updated Survey of Social Media Use in the American Urological Association. Urology Practice 2015 (In press). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urpr.2014.09.009
3. Wilkinson SE, Basto MY, Perovic G, et al. The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: Analytics and trends from eight international meetings. BJU Int 2015;115:839-46.
4. Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, et al. The use of social media in endourology: An analysis of the 2013 world congress of endourology meeting. J Endourol 2015;29;615-20.
5. Loeb S. Social media makes global urology meetings truly global. BJU Int 2015;115:175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.13027
6. Symplur.com Symplur: The Healthcare Hashtag project. http://www.symplur.com. Accessed May 20, 2015
7. Thangasamy IA, Leveridge M, Davies BJ, et al. International urology journal club via Twitter: 12-month experience. Eur Urol 2014;66:112-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.034
8. Nason GJ, O’Kelly F, Kelly ME, et al. The emerging use of Twitter by urological journals. BJU Int 2015;115:486-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12840
9. Loeb S, Catto J, Kutikov A. Social media offers unprecedented opportunities for vibrant exchange of professional ideas across continents. Eur Urol 2014;66:118-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.048
10. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: The checklist for reporting results of internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
11. Fuoco M, Leveridge MJ. Early adopters or laggards? Attitudes toward and use of social media among urologists. BJU Int 2015;115:491-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12855
12. Roupret M, Morgan TM, Bostrom PJ, et al. European Association of Urology (@Uroweb) recommendations on the appropriate use of social media. Eur Urol 2014;66:628-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.046
13. American Urological Association: Social Media Best Practices. http://www.auanet.org/press-media/social-media-bp.cfm. Accessed May 20, 2015.
14. Murphy DG, Loeb S, Basto MY, et al. Engaging responsibly with social media: The BJUI guidelines. BJU Int 2014;114:9-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bju.12788
15. Shere M, Zhao XY, Koren G. The role of social media in recruiting for clinical trials in pregnancy. PloS one 2014;9:e92744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092744
16. Lane TS, Armin J, Gordon JS. Online recruitment methods for web-based and mobile health studies: A review of the literature. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4359
17. Matta R, Doiron C, Leveridge MJ. The dramatic increase in social media in urology. J Urol 2014;192:494-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.043