Noise-resistant affine skeletons of planar curves

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1842, Issue , 2000, Pages 742-754

  Betelu, Santiago ^a   Sapiro, Guillermo ^a   Tannenbaum, Allen ^b   Giblin, Peter J ^c  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM;

AFFINE INVARIANT; DE-NOISING; NOISY DATA; PLANAR CURVES; REAL IMAGES; ROBUST COMPUTATION; SIMPLE METHOD; SKEW SYMMETRIES;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 84944210244     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45054-8_48     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. S. Betelu, G. Sapiro, A. Tannenbaum and P. Giblin, “On the computation of the affine skeletons of planar curves and the detection of skew symmetry,” submitted to Pattern Recognition, 1999.
2. H. Blum, “Biological shape and visual science,” J. Theor. Biology 38, pp. 205-287, 1973.
3. J. M. Brady and H. Asada, “Smoothed local symmetries and their implementation,” Int. J. of Rob. Res. 3, 1984.
4. R. A. Brooks, “Symbolic reasoning among 3D models and 2D images,” Artificial Intelligence 17, pp. 285-348, 1981.
5. J. W. Bruce and P. J. Giblin, Curves and Singularities, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984; second edition 1992.
6. J. W. Bruce, P.J. Giblin and C. G. Gibson, “Symmetry sets,” Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 101A pp. 163-186, 1985.
7. J.W. Bruce and P.J. Giblin, “Growth, motion and one-parameter families of symmetry sets,” Proc. Royal Soc. Edinburgh 104A, pp. 179-204, 1986.
8. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. Sapiro, “Geodesic active contours,” Int. J. Computer Vision, 22:1 pp. 61-79, 1997.
9. P. Giblin and G. Sapiro “Affine invariant symmetry sets and skew symmetry,” International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, India, January 1998.
10. P. J. Giblin and G. Sapiro, “Affine invariant distances, envelopes and symmetry sets”, Geom. Ded. 71, pp. 237-261, 1998.
11. P.J. Giblin and G. Sapiro, “Affine versions of the symmetry set,” in Real and Complex Singularities, Chapman and Hall/CRC Research Notes in Mathematics 412 (2000), 173-187
12. Paul Holtom, Ph.D. Thesis, Liverpool University, 2000.
13. R. Jain, R. R. Kasturi, B. Schunck, Machine Vision, McGraw Hill, NY, 1995, p. 50.
14. I. Kovács and B. Julesz, “Perceptual sensitivity maps within globally defined visual shapes,” Nature 370 pp. 644-646, 1994.
15. S. Kichenassamy, A. Kumar, P. Olver, A. Tannenbaum, and A. Yezzi, “Conformal curvature flows: from phase transitions to active vision,” Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 134 (1996), pp. 275-301.
16. M. Leyton, Symmetry, Causality, Mind, MIT-Press, Cambridge, 1992.
17. L. Moisan, “Affine Plane Curve Evolution: A Fully Consistent Scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7, pp. 411-420, (1998)
18. R. L. Ogniewicz, Discrete Voronoi skeletons, Hartung-Gorre Verlag Konstanz, Zurich, 1993.
19. J. Ponce, “On characterizing ribbons and finding skewed symmetries,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, pp. 49-54, 1989.
20. F. P. Preparata and M. I. Shamos, Computational Geometry, Texts and Monographs in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
21. J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
22. L. Van Gool, T. Moons, and M. Proesmans, “Mirror and point symmetry under perspective skewing,” CVPR '96, pp. 285-292, San Francisco, June 1996.