A broader conceptualization of sexism: The case of Poland

Psychology of Gender Through the Lens of Culture: Theories and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 169-191

  Mikołajczak, Małgorzata ^a   Pietrzak, Janina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Ambivalent sexism; Gender; Poland; Prejudice; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944205684     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-14005-6_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (163)

1. Adamiak, E. (1997). Błogosławiona między niewiastami [Blessed among women]. Lublin. Poland: Wydawnictwo KUL.
2. Anderson, S. J., & Johnson, J. T. (2003). The who and when of “gender-blind” attitudes: Predictors of gender-role egalitarianism in two different domains. Sex Roles, 49, 527–532.
3. Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1192–1207.
4. Armstrong, C. L. (Ed.). (2013). Media disparity: A gender battleground. Lanham: Lexington Books.
5. Auleytner, J. (Ed.). (2008). Wieloaspektowa diagnoza sytuacji kobiet na rynku pracy. Raport końcowy. [A multifaceted diagnosis of the situation of women on the labour market. Final report]. Warsaw: Ministerstwo Pracy i Polityki Społecznej.
6. Ayres, M. M., Friedman, C. K., & Leaper, C. (2009). Individual and situational factors related to young women’s likelihood of confronting sexism in their everyday lives. Sex Roles, 61, 449–460.
7. Badinter, E. (2012). The conflict: Woman and mother. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
8. Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Piebinga, L., & Moya, M. (2010). How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. Sex Roles, 62, 532–544.
9. Becker, J. C. (2010). Why do women endorse hostile and benevolent sexism? The role of salient female subtypes and internalization of sexist contents. Sex Roles,62, 453–467.
10. Becker, J. C., & Wagner, U. (2009). Doing gender differently-The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women’s endorsement of sexist beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 487–508.
11. Becker, J. C., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 62–77.
12. Blaise, M. (2005). Playing it straight: Uncovering gender discourse in the early childhood classroom. New York: Routledge.
13. Boski, P. (2006). Humanism-materialism: Century long polish cultural origins and twenty years of research in cross-cultural psychology. In V. Kim & Y. Kuo-Shu (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context(pp. 373–402). New York: Kluewer Plenum/Academic.
14. Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22, 1413–1418.
15. Brehm, S. S. (1992). Intimate relationships. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
16. Brickell, K., & Chant, S. (2010). ‘The unbearable heaviness of being’ reflections on female altruism in Cambodia, Philippines, The Gambia and Costa Rica. Progress in Development Studies, 10, 145–159.
17. Budrowska, B. (2000). Macierzyństwo jako punkt zwrotny w życiu kobiety. [Motherhood as a turning point in a woman’s life]. Wrocław. Poland: Foundation for Polish Science.
18. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
19. Calogero, R. M. (2012). Objectification theory, self-objectification, and body image. In T. F. Cash (Ed.), Encyclopedia of body image and human appearance(pp. 574–580). London: Academic.
20. Calogero, R. M., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100, 211–228.
21. Campbell, A. (1984). Women at war with America: Private lives in a patriotic era. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Charkiewicz, E. (2009). Matki do sterylizacji. Neoliberalny rasizm w Polsce [Sterilization for mothers. Neoliberal racism in Poland]. http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl/pdf/f0053charkiewicz_szkic2.pdf.
23. Chia, R. C., Allred, L. J., & Jerzak, P. A. (1997). Attitudes toward women in Taiwan and China. Psychology of Women Quarterly,21, 137–150.
24. Chodorow, N. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the psychology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223–230.
26. Cikara, M., Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2009). Ambivalent sexism at home and at work: How attitudes toward women in relationships foster exclusion in the public sphere. In J. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification(pp. 444–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Constitution of the Polish People’s Republic passed by the Legislative Sejm on 22 July 1952. http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/
28. Cusack, T., & Bhreathnach-Lynch, S. (2003). Art, nation and gender: Ethnic landscapes, myths and mother figures. Aldershot: Ashgate.
29. Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 764–779.
30. Desperak, I. (2009). Kobiety i praca. Wielkie przegrane polskiej transformacji [Women and labour. The great losers of the Polish transformation]. In B. Budrowska (Ed.), Kobiety, feminizm, demokracja [Women, feminism, democracy] (pp. 95–110). Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
31. Desperak, I., & Rek, M. (2008). Ubóstwo. In B. Chołuj (Ed.), Polityka równości płci. Polska 2007. Raport. [Poverty. Gender equality politics. Poland 2007. A report]. Warsaw: UNDP.
32. Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2012). Flirting with disaster: Short-term mating orientation and hostile sexism predict different types of sexual harassment. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 521–531.
33. Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Ferreira, M. C. (2005). Dynamic stereotypes about women and men in Latin America and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 209–226.
34. Douglas, S., & Michaels, M. (2005). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined all women. New York: Free Press.
35. Dumont, M., Sarlet, M., & Dardenne, B. (2010). Be too kind to a woman, she’ll feel incompetent: Benevolent sexism shifts self-construal and autobiographical memories toward incompetence. Sex Roles,62, 545–553.
36. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543–558.
37. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 1–35.
38. Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2009). Collective action in modern times: How modern expressions of prejudice prevent collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 749–768.
39. Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. A., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS ONE, 6, e25656.
40. Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21, 338–357.
41. Fidelis, M. (2004). Equality through protection: The politics of women’s employment in postwar Poland, 1945–1956. Slavic Review, 301–324.
42. Fidelis, M. (2010). Women, communism, and industrialization in postwar Poland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
44. Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265–273.
45. Frąckowiak-Sochańska (2011). Czas wolny kobiet i mężczyzn. Ilość i jakość czasu wolnego jako wymiary nierówności społecznych [Leisure time of women and men. Quantity and quality of leisure time as dimensions of social inequalities]. In D. Mroczkowska (Ed.), Czas wolny. Refleksje, dylematy, perspektywy [Leisure time. Reflections, dilemmas, perspectives] (pp. 190–210). Warsaw: Difin.
46. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification Theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
47. Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
48. Furnham, A., & Mak, T. (1991). Sex role stereotyping in television commercials: A review and comparison of fourteen studies done on five continents over 25 Years. Sex Roles, 41, 413–437.
49. Fuszara, M. (2002). Kobiety w Polsce na przełomie wieków [Women in Poland at the turn of the centuries]. Warsaw: Institute of Public Affairs.
50. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism(pp. 61–89). Orlando: Academic.
51. Gal, S., & Kligman, G. (2000). The politics of gender after socialism: A comparative-historical essay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. García, B., & Oliveira, O. (1997). Motherhood and extradomestic work in urban Mexico. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 16, 367–384.
53. Gaunt, R. (2013). Ambivalent sexism and perceptions of men and women who violate gendered family roles. Community, Work & Family, 16, 401–416.
54. Gervais, S. J., & Vescio, T. K. (2012). The effect of patronizing behavior and control on men and women’s performance in stereotypically masculine domains. Sex Roles, 66, 479–491
55. Gibbons, J. L., Hamby, B. A., & Dennis, W. D. (1997). Researching gender role ideologies internationally and cross-culturally. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 151–170.
56. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
57. Glauber, R. (2007). Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 951–961.
58. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
59. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly,21, 119–135.
60. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
61. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Ambivalent sexism revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 530–535.
62. Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.
63. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., López López, W. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
64. Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles, 47, 433–441.
65. Gorman, K. A., & Fritzsche, B. A. (2002). The good-mother stereotype: Stay at home (or wish that you did!). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2190–2201.
66. Graff, A. (2000). Świat bez kobiet. Płeć w polskim życiu publicznym [World without women. Gender in Polish public life]. Warsaw: W.A.B.
67. Graff, A. (2010). Magma i inne próby zrozumienia, o co tu chodzi [Magma and other attempts at understanding what it is all about]. Warsaw: Krytyka Polityczna.
68. Gromkowska, A. (2002). Kobiecość w kulturze globalnej. Rekonstrukcje i reprezentacje [Femininity in global culture. Reconstructions and representations]. Poznań. Poland: Wolumin.
69. Grzywacz, J. G., Arcury, T. A., Marin, A., Carrillo, L., Burke, B., Coates, M. L., & Quandt, S. A. (2007). Work-family conflict: Experiences and health implications among immigrant Latinos. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1119–1130.
70. Hamer, K. (2012). Identyfikacje społeczne a płeć biologiczna i psychologiczna [Social identifications, sex and gender]. In A. Chybicka, N. Kosakowska-Berezecka, & P. Pawlicka (Eds.), Podróże między kobiecością a męskością [ Journeys between femininity and masculinity] (pp. 17–38). Cracow: Impuls.
71. Hayes, E. R., & Swim, J. K. (2013). African, Asian, Latina/o, and European Americans’ responses to popular measures of sexist beliefs. Some cautionary notes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 155–166.
72. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
73. Heflick, N. A., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601.
74. Heinen, J., & Wator, M. (2006). Child care in Poland before, during, and after the transition: Still a women’s business. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 13, 189–216.
75. Herrera, R. S., & DelCampo, R. L. (1995). Beyond the superwoman syndrome: Work satisfaction and family functioning among working-class, Mexican American women. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Science, 17, 149–160.
76. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2003). The second shift. London: Penguin Books.
77. Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.
78. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2008). Culture, leadership and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
79. Hryciuk, R. E. (2012). O znikającej matce. Upolitycznione macierzyństwo w Ameryce Łacińskiej i w Polsce [On the disappearing mother. Politicized motherhood in Latin America and in Poland]. In R. E. Hryciuk & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Pożegnanie z Matką Polką;? [Farewell to Mother Pole?] (pp. 267–288). Warsaw: WUW.
80. Hryciuk, R. E., & Korolczuk, E. (2012). Wstęp: Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? [Introduction: Farewell to Mother Pole?]. In R. E. Hryciuk & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Pożegnanie z Matką Polką?[Farewell to Mother Pole?] (pp. 7–26). Warsaw: WUW.
81. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. London: University of California Press.
82. Jackson, L. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
83. Janion, M. (1996). Kobiety i duch inności [Women and the spirit of otherness]. Warsaw: Sic!.
84. Janion, M. (2006). Niesamowita Słowiańszczyzna [ The incredible Slavic world]. Cracow: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
85. Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.
86. John Paul, I. I. (1988). Apostolic Letter Mulieris dignitatem. Released in Rome, August 15 1988.
87. John Paul, I. I. (1995). Letter to Women. Released in Rome, June 29, 1995.
88. Johnson, A. G. (1997). The gender knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
89. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509.
90. Karasiewicz, K., & Kosakowska, N. (2008). Kij ma dwa końce, mężczyźni też są dyskryminowani ze względu na płeć [The sword is double-edged, men are also disciminated against]. In A. Chybicka & B. Pastwa-Wojciechowska (Eds.), Kobiecość w obliczu zmian. Studia interdyscyplinarne [Femininity in the face of changes. Interdisciplinary studies] (pp. 149–168). Cracow: Impuls.
91. Korolczuk, E. (2009). Naturalna więź? Wizerunki relacji matka-córka w wybranych tekstach kultury popularnej [A natural bond? Images of mother-daughter relationships in popular culture]. In B. Budrowska (Ed.), Kobiety, feminizm, demokracja [Women, feminism, democracy] (pp. 43–69). Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
92. Korolczuk, E. (2012). Ciało z ciała matki? Konstruowanie macierzyństwa i seksualności w kontekście międzypokoleniowym [Flesh of the mother’s flesh? Construction of motherhood and sexuality in the intergenerational context]. In R. E. Hryciuk & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Pożegnanie z Matką Polką; ? [Farewell to Mother Pole?] (pp. 215–234). Warsaw: WUW.
93. Kosakowska, N. (2004). Stereotypy kobiecych i męskich ról społecznych w ocenie dzieci, nastolatków i dorosłych [Stereotypes of feminine and masculine social roles in the eyes of children, adolescents and adults]. In Z. Łoś (Ed.), Emocje i doświadczenia w rozwoju—filozoficzne i metodologiczne inspiracje. Psychologia rozwojowa [Emotions and experiences in the course of development—philosophical and methodological inspirations. Developmental psychology] (pp. 65–79). Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press.
94. Łaciak, B. (1995). Wzór osobowy współczesnej Polki [The modern Polish women’s role model]. In A. Titkow & H. Domański (Eds.), Co to znaczy być kobietą w Polsce [What it means to be a woman in Poland]. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
95. Łaciak, B. (2012). Ciąża i macierzyństwo. Serialowe reprezentacje jako element społecznego dyskursu [Pregnancy and motherhood. TV series representations as part of the social discourse]. In R. E. Hryciuk & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Pożegnanie z Matką Polką?[Farewell to Mother Pole?] (pp. 393–420). Warsaw: WUW.
96. Lake, C., Snell, A., Gormley, C., & Lethbridge-Cejku, F. (2013). Name It. Change It. Women’s media Center: She should run. An examination of the impact of media coverage of women candidates’ appearance. http://www.nameitchangeit.org.
97. Land, H., & Rose, H. (1985). Compulsory altruism for some or an altruistic society for all? In P.Bean, J. Ferris, & D. Whynes (Eds.), In defence of welfare(pp. 74–96). London: Tavistock.
98. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (1998). Egalitarian daters/traditionalist dates. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 468–477.
99. Laner, M. R., & Ventrone, N. A. (2000). Dating scripts revisited. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 488–500.
100. Lara-Cantú, M. A. (1989). A sex role inventory with scales for “machismo” and “self-sacrificing woman”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 386–398.
101. Lee, T. L., Fiske, S. T., Glick, P., & Chen, Z. (2010). Ambivalent sexism in close relationships: (Hostile) power and (benevolent) romance shape relationship ideals. Sex Roles, 62, 583–601.
102. Lisowska, E. (2009), Kobiety w biznesie—menedżerki i właścicielki firm [Women in business—managers and company owners]. In B. Budrowska (Ed.), Kobiety, feminizm, demokracja [Women, feminism, democracy] (pp. 133–155). Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
103. Malinowska, E. (1995). Socio-political changes in Poland and the problem of sex discrimination. Women’s Studies International, 18, 35–43.
104. Mandal, E. (2003). Kobiecość i męskość. Popularne opinie a badania naukowe [Femininity and masculinity. Popular opinions and scientific research]. Warsaw: Żak.
105. Mariko, E. (1989). “It’s all mother’s fault”: Childcare and the socialization of working mothers in Japan. Journal of Japanese Studies, 15, 67–91.
106. Marody, M., & Giza-Poleszczuk, A. (2000). Changing images of identity in Poland: From the self-sacrificing to the self-investing woman? In S. Gal & G. Kligman (Eds.), Reproducing gender: Politics, publics and everyday life after socialism(pp. 151–175). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
107. McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes. A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16.
108. Mealy, M., Stephan, W. G., & Abalakina-Paap, M. (2006). Reverence for mothers in Ecuadorian and Euro-American culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 465–484.
109. Mikołajczak, M., & Pietrzak, J. (July 2014a). Ambivalent sexism—A broader conceptualization. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Rome, Italy.
110. Mikołajczak, M., & Pietrzak, J. (2014b). Ambivalent sexism and religiosity: Connected through values. Sex Roles, 387–399.
111. Mottarella, K. E., Fritzsche, B. A., Whitten, S. N., & Bedsole, D. (2009). Exploration of “good mother” stereotypes in the college environment. Sex Roles, 60, 223–231.
112. Moya, M., Glick, P., Expósito, F., de Lemus, S., & Hart, J. (2007). It’s for your own good: Benevolent sexism and women’s reactions to protectively justified restrictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1421–1434.
113. Odrzygóźdź, A., & Sarnecka, B. (2006). Katolicka młodość, katolicka dorosłość. Negocjacje w obrębie katolickiego modelu kobiecości [Catholic youth, Catholic adulthood. Negotiations within the Catholic model of femininity]. In K. Leszczyńska & A. Kościańska (Eds.), Kobiety i religie [Women and religions] (pp. 209–227). Cracow: Nomos.
114. OECD (2014). OECD data on time use [Data file]. http://www.oecd.org/gender/data/OECD_1564_TUSupdatePortal.xls.
115. Orloff, A. S. (2009). Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states: An unfinished agenda. Sociological Theory, 27, 317–244.
116. Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
117. Pietrzak, J., & Mikołajczak, M. (2011). Religia a legitymizacja nierówności płciowej w Polsce [Religion and legitimization of gender inequality in Poland]. In M. Kofta, M. Bilewicz (Eds.), Wobec obcych. Zagrożenia psychologiczne a stosunki międzygrupowe [Toward strangers. Psychological threats and intergroup relations] (pp. 115–128). Warsaw: PWN.
118. Pietrzak, J., Mikołajczak, M., Chroł, K., & Markiewicz, M. (July 2011). The parenthood penalty/bonus in recruitment. Poster presented at the 34th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Istanbul, Turkey.
119. Public Opinion Research Center. (2013). Religia i Kościół w przestrzeni publicznej. Komunikat z badań [Religion and the Church in the public domain. A survey release]. http://www.cbos.pl.
120. Public Opinion Research Center. (2014). Religijność polskiej wsi. Komunikat z badań [Religiosity of the Polish countryside. A survey release]. http://www.cbos.pl.
121. Puvia, E. (2011). A feminine look at female objectification: Makeup and self-objectification, sexy women and their dehumanization (Doctoral dissertation). http://paduaresearch.cab.unipd.it.
122. Puvia E., Vaes J. (2013). Being a Body: Women’s appearance related self-views and their dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. Sex Roles, 68, 484–495.
123. Reszke, I. (2001). Uwarunkowania feminizacji biedy w Polsce [Preconditions for the feminization of poverty in Poland]. Kultura i społeczeństwo, 45, 73–83.
124. Reynolds-Dobbs, W., Thomas, K. M., & Harrison, M. S. (2008). From mammy to superwoman images that hinder black women’s career development. Journal of Career Development, 35, 129–150.
125. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Motherhood as a status characteristic. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 683–700.
126. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179.
127. Russo, N. F. (1976). The motherhood mandate. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 143–153.
128. Settles, I. H., Pratt-Hyatt, J. S., & Buchanan, N. T. (2008). Through the lens of race: Black and white women’s perceptions of womanhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 454–468.
129. Shaevitz, M. H. (1985). The superwoman syndrome. New York: Warner Books.
130. Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687–696.
131. Siebler, F., Sabelus, S., & Bohner, G. (2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 22–35.
132. Slaughter, A-M. (13 June 2012). Why women still can’t have it all. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com.
133. Sorokowski P., & Butovskaya, M. L. (2012). Height preferences in humans may not be universal: Evidence from the Datoga people of Tanzania. Body Image,9, 510–516.
134. Stevens, E. P. (1973). Machismo and marianismo. Society, 10, 57–63.
135. Stockard, J., & Johnson, M. M. (1992). Sex and gender in society(2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
136. Stulhofer, A., & Sandfort, T. (2005). Introduction: Sexuality and gender in times of transition. In A. Stulhofer & T. Sandfort (Eds.), Sexuality and gender in postcommunist Eastern Europe and Russia(pp. 1–28). New York: Haworth.
137. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2013a). Men’s oppressive beliefs predict their breast size preferences in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1199–1207.
138. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2013b). Resource security impacts men’s female breast size preferences. PLoS ONE, 8, e57623.
139. Swami, V., Coles, R., Wyrozumska, K., Wilson, E., Salem N., & Furnham, A. (2010). Oppressive beliefs at play: Associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual differences in sexism, objectification of others, and media exposure. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 365–379.
140. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
141. Swim, J. K., Becker, J., Lee, E., & Pruitt, E. R. (2009). Sexism reloaded: Worldwide evidence for its endorsement, expression, and emergence in multiple contexts. In H. Landrine & N. Russo (Eds.), Handbook of diversity in feminist psychology(pp. 137–172). Washington: American Psychological Association.
142. Świstow, K. (2006). Współczesne kobiety wobec nauki Kościoła [Modern women in the light of the Church’s teachings]. In K. Leszczyńska & A. Kościańska (Eds.), Kobiety i religie [Women and religions] (pp. 139–158). Cracow: Nomos.
143. Tang, T. N., & Tang, C. S. (2001). Gender role internalization, multiple roles, and Chinese women’s mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly,25, 181–196.
144. Titkow, A. (2001). On the appreciated role of women. In M. Ingham, H. Ingham, & H. Domanski (Eds.), Women on the Polish labor market. Budapest: Central European University Press.
145. Titkow, A. (2007). Tożsamość polskich kobiet. Ciągłość, zmiana, konteksty [ Identity of Polish women. Continuity, change, contexts]. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
146. Titkow, A., & Domański H. (1995). Co to znaczy być kobietą w Polsce [What it means to be a woman in Poland]. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
147. Titkow, A., Duch-Krzysztoszek, D., & Budrowska, B. (2004). Nieodpłatna praca kobiet. Mity, realia, perspektywy [ Unpaid work of women. Myths, realities, perspectives]. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.
148. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ca change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 842–849.
149. Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
150. United Nations Development Programme. (2009). Human development report 2009. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2009_EN_Indicators.pdf.
151. Urbańska, S. (2012). Naturalna troska o ciało i moralność versus profesjonalna produkcja osobowości. Konstruowanie modelu człowieka w dyskursach macierzyńskich w latach 70.(PRL) i na poczatku XXI wieku [The natural concern for the body and morality versus professional production of personality. Construction of a human model in motherhood discourses in the 70s (Polish People’s Republic) and at the beginning of the 21st century]. In R. E. Hryciuk & E. Korolczuk (Eds.), Pożegnanie z Matką Polką? [Farewell to Mother Pole?] (pp. 49–70). Warsaw, Poland: WUW.
152. Van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664.
153. Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
154. Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society,12, 321–343.
155. Walczewska, S. (1999). Damy, rycerze i feministki: Kobiecy dyskurs emancypacyjny w Polsce [Ladies, knights, feminists: Female emancipative discourse in Poland]. Cracow: eFKa.
156. Walker, S., & Barton, L. (2013). Gender, class and education. Routledge.
157. Waring, M. (1988). If women counted. A new feminist economics. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
158. Webster, M. Jr., & Driskell, J. E. Jr. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 140–165.
159. Werbner, P. (2007). Upolitycznione macierzyństwo i feminizacja obywatelstwa: Ruchy kobiece i transformacja sfery publicznej [Politicized motherhood and the feminization of citizenship: Women’s movements and the transformation of the public domain]. In R. Hryciuk & A. Kościańska (Eds.), Gender. Perspektywa antropologiczna. Vol. 1, Organizacja społeczna [Gender. An anthropological perspective. Vol. 1, Social structure]. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
160. Williams, M. J., & Chen, S. (2013). When “mom’s the boss”: Control over domestic decision making reduces women’s interest in workplace power. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20, 1–17.
161. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Morrow.
162. Woods-Giscombé, C. L. (2010). Superwoman schema: African American women’s views on stress, strength, and health. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 668–683.
163. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender & nation. London: Sage Publications.