EROICA: A rule-based approach to organizational policy management in workflow systems

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2419, Issue , 2002, Pages 201-212

  Kumar, Akhil ^a   Zhao, J Leon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

BUSINESS CONSTRAINTS; COMPLEX ROLES; FLEXIBLE MECHANISMS; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES; RESOLUTION MECHANISMS; RULE-BASED APPROACH; WORK-FLOW SYSTEMS; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84944080264     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45703-8_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. C. Bussler, "Policy Resolution in Workflow management Systems," DEC EROICA: A Rule-Based Approach to Organizational Policy Management 211 Technical Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, Fall 1994.
2. C. Bussler and S. Jablonski, "Policy Resolution for Workflow management", Proceedings 28th Hawaii International Conf. on System Sciences, January 1995.
3. S. Castano and M. Fugini, "Rules and Patterns for Security in Workflow Systems", DB Security 59-74, 1998.
4. S. Ceri, P. Grefen and G. Sanchez, "WIDE – A Distributed Architecture for Workflow Management", Proc. of the 7th International Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, Birmingham, 1997.
5. E. C. Cheng, "An object-oriented organizational model to support dynamic rolebased access control in electronic commerce", Decision Support Systems. vol.29, no.4; Dec. 2000; p.357-69.
6. D.K.W. Chiu, Q. Li and K. Karlapalem. "A meta modeling approach for workflow management system supporting exception handling", Information Systems, 24(2), pp159-184, May 1999.
7. C. Hagen and G. Alonso, Exception handling in workflow management systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Oct. 2000; 26 (10):943-58.
8. Y. -N. Huang and MC Shan, "Policies in a Resource Manager of Workflow Systems: Modeling, Enforcement and Management", Proceedings of the 15th International Conf. on Data Engineering, 23-26 March 1999, Sydney, Austrialia.
9. S. Jajodia, P. Samarati, V. Subrahmanian, and E. Bertino, "A unified framework for enforcing multiple access control policies," In SIGMOD'97, pages 474--485, Tucson, AZ, May 1997.
10. A. Kumar and Zhao, J.L., "Dynamic Routing and Operational Controls in Workflow Management Systems," Management Science, 45(2), February 1999.
11. A. Kumar, "A framework for handling delegation in workflow management systems," Workshop on Information Technology and Systems (WITS), Charlotte, December 1999.
12. A. Kumar, W.M.P. van der Aalst and H.M.W. Verbeek, “Dynamic Work Distribution in Workflow Management Systems: How to balance quality and performance?” Journal of MIS, Winter 2001-2002, Vol. 18, No. 3, 157-193.
13. D.R. McCarthy and U. Dayal, "The Architecture of an Active Database System", in Proc. ACM SIGMOD, Portland, 1989, pp. 215-224.
14. R.S. Sandhu, E.J. Coyne, H.L. Feinstein, and C.E. Youman, "Role-Based Access Control Models", IEEE Computer, 29(2): 38-47, 1996.
15. R.S. Sandhu, V. Bhamidipati, and Q. Manuawer, "The ARBAC97 Model for Role-Based Admnistration of Roles", ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2(1):105-135.
16. R. Simon and Mary Ellen Zurko, "Separation of Duty in Role-based Environments", Proceedings of the 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop (CSFW '97), 183-194.
17. M. zur Mühlen, "Resource Modeling in Workflow Applications", Proceedings of the 1999 Workflow Management Conference. Muenster, Germany, November 9th 1999, Münster, 137-153.
18. M. zur Mühlen, "Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems Using Meta Models", Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1999.