Generating domain models from ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2425, Issue , 2002, Pages 160-166

  Kuzniarz, Ludwik ^a   Staron, Miroslaw ^a  

^a BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; ONTOLOGY; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

AUTOMATIC ACQUISITION; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DOMAIN MODEL; DOMAIN STRUCTURE; OBJECT ORIENTED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; ONTOLOGY DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE;

OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84944073303     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46102-7_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Barners-Lee T., Hendler J., Lasilla O., The Semantic Web, Scientific American, May 2001
2. Barners-Lee T., Semantic Web Road map, WWW Consortium September 1998, http://www.w3c.org/DesignIssues/Semantic.html
3. Booch G., Unified Software Development Process, Addison-Wesley, 1998
4. Chang W. W., A Discussion of the Relationship Between RDF-Schema and UML, W3C note, document http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/NOTE-rdf-uml-19980804
5. CraneField S., UML and the Semantic Web, In the Preceedings of UML 2001 conference, Toronto 2001
6. Cranefield S., Purvis M., UML as an Ontology modelling language, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Information Integration, 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), 1999
7. DAML language specification,http://www.daml.org/2000/10/daml-ont.html, 2000
8. Fenzel D., The Semantic Web and its languages, IEEE Inteligent Systems, November/December 2000
9. Fensel D., Horrocks I., Van Harmelen F., Decker S., Erdmann M., Klein M., OIL in a nutshell, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW 2000), volume 1937 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer Verlag 2000
10. Gruber T. R., A Translation approach to portable ontology specification, Knowledge acquision 5(2), October 2000
11. Hellman E., Kuzniarz L., Staron M., Translation from DAML+OIL encoded Ontologies to UML domain models, Internal technical report, Blekinge Institute of Technology
12. Kay M., XSLT, Programmer.s reference, Wrox press, 2000
13. Klein M., Fensel D., Van Harmelen F., Horrocks I., The Relation between Ontologies and Schema-languages: Translating OIL-specifications in XML- Schema,Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Ontologies and Problem-solving Methods, 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence ECAI-00, Berlin, Germany August 20-25, 2000
14. Klein M., Broekstra J., Decker S., Fensel D., Harmelen F., Horrocks I., Enabling knowledge representation on the Web by extending RDF Schema, http://www.ontoknowledge.org/
15. Klempe A., Warmer J., Object Constraint Language: Precise modeling with UML, Addison-Wesley, 1999
16. Kruchten P. The Rational Unified Process, An Introduction, Addison-Wesley, 2000
17. Larman C., Applying UML and Patterns, An introduction to Object-Oriented Analisys and design and The Unified Process 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, 2001
18. National Comitee for Information Technology standards, Technical Comitee T2 (Information Interchange and Interpretation), http://logic.stanford.edu/kif/dpans.html, 1998
19. Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, WWW Consortium, 1999, http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax- 19990222
20. Schwartz A., The Semanic Web In Breadth, http://logicerror.com semanticWeblong
21. Annotated DAML+OIL (March 2001) Ontology Markup, http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-walkthru.html
22. UML Specification version 1.4, OMG 2001, www.omg.org
23. XMI Specification version 1.1, OMG 2000, www.omg.org