Statistical 2D and 3D shape analysis using Non-Euclidean metrics

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2489, Issue , 2002, Pages 428-435

  Larsen, Rasmus ^a   Hilger, Klaus Baggesen ^a   Wrobel, Mark C ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

3D SHAPE ANALYSIS; AUTO-CORRELATION FACTORS; DATA-DRIVEN METHODS; DIFFERENT SHAPES; MINIMUM NOISE FRACTION; NOISE VARIANCE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS ANALYSIS; SHAPE DECOMPOSITION;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84944041621     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45787-9_54     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. T. F. Cootes, G. J. Taylor, D. H. Cooper, and J. Graham, “Training models of shape from sets of examples,” in British Machine Vision Conference: Selected Papers 1992, (Berlin), Springer-Verlag, 1992.
2. P. Switzer, “Min/max autocorrelation factors for multivariate spatial imagery,” in Computer Science and Statistics (L. Billard, ed.), pp. 13-16, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North Holland), 1985.
3. R. Larsen, H. Eiriksson, and M. B. Stegmann, “Q-MAF shape decomposition,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2001, 4th International Conference, Utrecht, The Netherlands, vol. 2208 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 837-844, Springer, 2001.
4. A. A. Green, M. Berman, P. Switzer, and M. D. Craig, “A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 26, pp. 65-74, Jan. 1988.
5. K. B. Hilger, M. B. Stegmann, and R. Larsen, “A noise robust statistical texture model,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2002, 5th International Conference, Tokyo, Japan, 2002. 8 pp. (submitted).
6. T. F. Cootes, G. J. Edwards, and C. J. Taylor, “Active appearance models,” in Proceedings of the European Conf. On Computer Vision, pp. 484-498, Springer, 1998.
7. F. L. Bookstein, Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, 1991. 435 pp.
8. L. Molgedey and H. G. Schuster, “Separation of a mixture of independent signals using time delayed correlations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 72, no. 23, pp. 3634-3637, 1994.
9. B. van Ginneken, Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Chest Radiographs. PhD thesis, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2001. 184 pp.
10. P. R. Andresen, F. L. Bookstein, K. Conradsen, B. K. Ersbøll, J. L. Marsh, and S. Kreiborg, “Surface-bounded growth modeling applied to human mandibles,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 19, Nov. 2000. 1053-1063.
11. P. R. Andresen and M. Nielsen, “Non-rigid registration by geometry-constrained diffusion,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 81-88, 2001.
12. J. C. Gower, “Generalized Procrustes analysis,” Psychometrika, vol. 40, pp. 33-50, 1975.
13. C. Goodall, “Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 285-339, 1991.
14. H. Hotelling, “Relations between two sets of variables,” Biometrika, vol. 28, pp. 321-377, 1936.
15. J. M. F. T. Berge, “Orthogonal Procrustes rotation for two or more matrices,” Psychometrika, vol. 42, pp. 267-276, 1977.