Performance evaluation of an all-fiber image-reject homodyne coherent Doppler wind lidar

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 4145-4153

  Abari, C F ^a   Pedersen, A T ^a   Dellwik, E ^a   Mann, J ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANEMOMETER; DOPPLER LIDAR; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; WIND FIELD; WIND MEASUREMENT; WIND VELOCITY;

EID: 84943776717     PISSN: 18671381     EISSN: 18678548     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-4145-2015     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abari, C. F., Pedersen, A. T., and Mann, J.: An all-fiber imagereject homodyne coherent Doppler wind lidar, Opt. Express, 22, 25880-25894, 2014.
2. Angelou, N., Abari, C. F., Mann, J., Mikkelsen, T., and Sjöholm, M.: Challenges in noise removal from Doppler spectra acquired by a continuous-wave lidar, in: Proc. of the 26th Int. Laser Radar Conf., Porto Heli, Greece, 25-29 June, 2012, s5P-01, 2012a.
3. Angelou, N., Mann, J., Sjöholm, M., and Courtney, M.: Direct measurement of the spectral transfer function of a laser based anemometer, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 83, 033111, doi:10.1063/1.3697728, 2012b.
4. Bingöl, F., Mann, J., and Larsen, G. C.: Lidar measurements of wake dynamics Part I: one dimensional scanning, Wind Energy, 13, 51-61, 2010.
5. Grund, C. J., Banta, R. M., George, J. L., Howell, J. N., Post, M. J., Richter, R. A., and Weickmann, A. M.: High-resolution Doppler lidar for boundary layer and cloud research, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 376-393, 2001.
6. Hall, F., Huffaker, R., Hardesty, R., Jackson, M., Lawrence, T., Post, M., Richter, R., and Weber, B.: Wind measurement accuracy of the NOAA pulsed infrared Doppler lidar, Appl. Optics, 23, 2503-2506, 1984.
7. Hayes, M. H.: Statistical Digital Signal Processing and Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 391-424, 1996.
8. Horst, T. W. and Oncley, S. P.: Corrections to inertial-range power spectra measured by CSAT3 and Solent sonic anemometers, 1. Path-averaging errors, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 119, 375-395, 2006.
9. Karlsson, C. J., Olsson, F. Å. A., Letalick, D., and Harris, M.: All-fiber multifunction continuous-wave coherent laser radar at 1.55 μm for range, speed, vibration, and wind measurements, Appl. Optics, 39, 3716-3726, 2000.
10. Kylia: Single polarization 90 optical hybrid COH24, available at: http://www.kylia.com/, last access: 23 September, 2015.
11. Mayor, S. and Eloranta, E. W.: Two-dimensional vector wind fields from volume imaging lidar data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 1331-1346, 2001.
12. Menzies, R. T. and Hardesty, R. M.: Coherent Doppler lidar for measurements of wind fields, P. IEEE, 77, 449-462, 1989.
13. Mikkelsen, T., Mann, J., Courtney, M., and Sjöholm, M.: Lidarbased research and innovation at DTU wind energy - a review, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 524, 012007, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012007, 2014.
14. Moslehi, B.: Analysis of optical phase noise in fiber-optic systems employing a laser source with arbitrary coherence time, J. Lightwave Technol., 4, 1334-1351, 1986.
15. Pedersen, A. T., Abari, C. F., Mann, J., and Mikkelsen, T.: Theoretical and experimental signal-to-noise ratio assessment in new direction sensing continuous-wave Doppler lidar, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 524, 012004, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012004, 2014.
16. Pichugina, Y. L., Banta, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Sandberg, S. P., and Hardesty, R. M.: Doppler lidar-based wind-profile measurement system for offshore wind-energy and other marine boundary layer applications, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 327-349, 2012.
17. Razavi, B.: Design considerations for direct-conversion receivers, IEEE T. Circuits-II, 44, 428-435, 1997.
18. Sathe, A. and Mann, J.: A review of turbulence measurements using ground-based wind lidars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3147-3167, doi:10.5194/amt-6-3147-2013, 2013.
19. Schlipf, D., Cheng, P. W., and Mann, J.: Model of the correlation between lidar systems and wind turbines for lidar-assisted control, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 30, 2233-2240, 2013.
20. Schwiesow, R. and Cupp, R.: Offset local oscillator for cw laser Doppler anemometry, Appl. Optics, 20, 579-582, 1981.
21. Shimizu, K., Horiguchi, T., Koyamada, Y., and Kurashima, T.: Coherent self-heterodyne Brillouin OTDR for measurement of Brillouin frequency shift distribution in optical fibers, J. Lightwave Technol., 12, 730-736, 1994.
22. Smith, D. A., Harris, M., Coffey, A. S., Mikkelsen, T., Jørgensen, H. E., Mann, J., and Danielian, R.:Wind lidar evaluation at the Danish wind test site in Høvsøre, Wind Energy, 9, 87-93, 2006.
23. Sonnenschein, C. M. and Horrigan, F. A.: Signal-to-noise relationships for coaxial systems that heterodyne backscatter from the atmosphere, Appl. Optics, 10, 1600-1604, 1971.
24. Urey, H.: Spot size, depth-of-focus, and diffraction ring intensity formulas for truncated Gaussian beams, Appl. Optics, 43, 620-625, 2004.
25. Wang, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, L., Wu, S., Liu, B., Li, Z., and Chu, X.: Iodine-filter-based mobile Doppler lidar to make continuous and full-azimuth-scanned wind measurements: data acquisition and analysis system, data retrieval methods, and error analysis, Appl. Optics, 49, 6960-6978, 2010.