User modeling in adaptive interfaces

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 407, Issue , 1999, Pages 357-370

  Langley, Pat ^a  

^a DaimlerChrysler Research and Technology North America Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

ADAPTIVE INTERFACE; ADAPTIVE USER INTERFACE; COMPLEX TASK; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; RESEARCH EFFORTS; USER MODELING;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84943648245     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1984). Cognitive psychology and intelligent tutoring. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference ofthe Cognitive Science Society, 37-43. Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Baffes, P. T., and Mooney, R. J. (1995). A novel application of theory refinement to student modeling. Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 403-408. Portland, OR: AAAI Press.
3. Balabanovic, M. (1998). Exploring versus exploiting when leaming user models for text recommendation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 8: 71-102.
4. Basu, C., Hirsh, H., and Cohen, W. (1998). Recommendation as classification: Using social and contentbased information in recommendation. Proceedings of the Fifteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 714-720. Madison. Wl: AAAI Press.
5. Billsus, D., and Pazzani, M. (in press). A personal news agent that talks. leams and explains. Proceedings ofthe Third International Conference on Autonomaus Agents. Seattle: ACM Press.
6. Boone, G. (1998). Concept features in Re: Agent. an intelligent email agent. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomaus Agents. 141-148. Minneapolis, MN: ACM Press.
7. Brodley, C. E., and Smyth, P. (1997). Applying classification algorithms in practice. Statistics and Computing 7: 45-56.
8. Cypher, A. (1991). EAGER: Programming repetitive tasks by example. Proceedings ofthe Conference on Human Factars in Computing Systems, 33-39. New Orleans: ACM.
9. Cypher, A. (Ed.). (1993). Watch What I Do: Programming by Demonstration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Dent, L., Boticario, J., McDermott, J., Mitchell, T.. and Zaborowski, D. (1992). A personalleaming apprentice. Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 96-103. San Jose, CA: AAAI Press.
11. Elio, R., and Haddadi, A. (1998). Dialog management for an adaptive database assistant (Technical Report 98-3). Daimler-Benz Research and Technology Center. Palo Alto, CA.
12. Gervasio, M. T., Iba, W., and Langley, P. (in press). Leaming user evaluation functions for adaptive scheduling assistance. Proceedings of the Sixteeth International Conference on Machine Leaming. Bled. Slovenia: Morgan Kaufmann.
13. Hermens, L. A.. and Schlimmer, J. C. (1994). A machine-learning apprentice for the completion ofrepetitive forms. IEEE Expert 9: 28-33.
14. Hinkle, D., and Toomey, C. N. (1994). CLAVIER: Applying case-based reasoning to composite part fabrication. Proceedings of the Sixth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, 55-62. Seattle, WA: AAAI Press.
15. Lang, K. (1995). NEWSWEEDER: Learning to filter ncws. Proceedings ofthe Twelfth International Conference on Machine Leaming, 331-339. Lake Tahoe, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
16. Langley, P. (1995). Elements of Machine Leaming. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Langley, P. (1997). Machine learning for adaptive user interfaces. Proceedings of the 21st German Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 53-62. Freiburg. Germany: Springer.
18. Langley, P., and Ohlsson, S. (1984). Automated cognitive modeling. Proceedings ofthe Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 193-197. Austin, TX: Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Langley, P., and Simon, H. A. (1995). Applications of machine learning and rule induction. Communications ofthe ACM 38: 55-64.
20. Linden, G., Hanks, S., and Lesh, N. (1997). Interactive assessment of user preference models: The Automated Travel Assistant. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling, 67-78. Chia Laguna, Sardinia: Springer.
21. Mitchell, T. M., Mahadevan, S., and Steinberg, L. (1985). LEAP: A learning apprentice for VLSI design. Proceedings ofthe Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 573-580. Los Angeles, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
22. O'Shea, T. (1979). A self-improving quadratic tutor. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 11: 97-124.
23. Pazzani, M., Muramatsu, J., and Billsus, D. (1996). SYSKILL & WEBERT: ldentifying interesting web sites. Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 54-61. Portland, OR: AAAI Press.
24. Rich, E. (1979). User modeling via stereotypes. Cognitive Science 3: 329-354.
25. Rogers, S., Fiechter, C., and Langley, P. (in press). An adaptive interactive agent for route advice. Proceedings ofthe Third International Conference on Autonomaus Agents. Seattle: ACM Press.
26. Rudström, A. (1995). Applications of machine learning. Licentiate thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden.
27. Sarnrnut, C., Hurst, S., Kedizer, D., and Michie, D. (1992). Learning to fly. Proceedings ofthe Ninth International Conference on Machine Learning, 385-393. Aberdeen, Scotland: Morgan Kaufmann.
28. Schlimmer, J. C., and Hermens, L. A. (1993). Software agents: Completing pattems and constructing user interfaces. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1: 61-89.
29. Shardanand, U., and Maes, P. (1995). Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating 'word of mouth'. Proceedings ofthe Conference on Human Factars in Computing Systems, 210-217. Denver, CO: ACM Press.