The sexual selection paradigm: Have we overlooked other mechanisms in the evolution of male ornaments?

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 282, Issue 1816, 2015, Pages

  Candolin, Ulrika ^a   Tukiainen, Iina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Mate choice; Offspring survival; Parental care; Signals; Social selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; HATCHING; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; PARENTAL CARE; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SURVIVAL; TELEOST;

AGGRESSION; ANIMAL; COLOR; EVOLUTION; MALE; MATE CHOICE; NESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SMEGMAMORPHA;

AGGRESSION; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COLOR; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; NESTING BEHAVIOR; PIGMENTATION; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SMEGMAMORPHA;

EID: 84943645889     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1987     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersson M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2. Andersson M, Simmons LW. 2006 Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 296-302. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.03.015
3. Tobias JA, Seddon N. 2009 Signal design and perception in Hypocnemis antbirds: evidence for convergent evolution via social selection. Evolution 63, 3168-3189. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00795.x
4. Tobias JA, Gamarra-Toledo V, Garcia-Olaechea D, Pulgarin PC, Seddon N. 2011 Year-round resource defence and the evolution of male and female song in suboscine birds: social armaments are mutual ornaments. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2118-2138. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02345.x
5. West-Eberhard MJ. 1983 Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58, 155-183. doi:10.1086/413215
6. Tobias JA, Montgomerie R, Lyon BE. 2012 The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2274-2293. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0280
7. Searcy WA, Nowicki S. 2005 The evolution of animal communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A. 1996 Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 385-399. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x
9. Maynard Smith J, Harper D. 2003 Animal signals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Hoelzer GA. 1989 The good parent process of sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 38, 1067-1078. doi:10.1016/S0003-34728980146-0
11. Kelly NB, Alonzo SH. 2009 Will male advertisement be a reliable indicator of paternal care, if offspring survival depends on male care? Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 3175-3183. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0599
12. Clutton-Brock TH, Huchard E. 2013 Social competition and selection in males and females. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20130074. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0074
13. Lebas NR. 2006 Female finery is not for males. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 170-173. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.007
14. Trivers RL, Campbell B. 1972 Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871-1971 ed. B Campbell, pp. 136-179. London, UK: Heinemann.
15. Bateman AJ. 1948 Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349-368. doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21
16. Clutton-Brock T. 2007 Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318, 1882-1885. doi:10.1126/science.1133311
17. Clutton-Brock T. 2009 Sexual selection in females. Anim. Behav. 77, 3-11. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.026
18. Candolin U. 2000 Changes in expression and honesty of sexual signalling over the reproductive lifetime of sticklebacks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2425-2430. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1301
19. Kraak SBM, Bakker TCM, Mundwiler B. 1999 Correlates of the duration of the egg collecting phase in the three-spined stickleback. J. Fish Biol. 54, 1038-1049. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1999.tb00856.x
20. Candolin U, Vlieger L. 2013 Estimating the dynamics of sexual selection in changing environments. Evol. Biol. 40, 589-600. doi:10.1007/s11692-013-9234-7
21. Tinbergen N. 1951 The study of instinct. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
22. McKinnon JS. 1996 Red coloration and male parental behavior in the threespine stickleback. J. Fish Biol. 49, 1030-1033. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00099.x
23. McLennan DA, McPhail JD. 1989 Experimental investigations of the evolutionary significance of sexually dimorphic nuptial coloration in Gasterosteus aculeatus L: temporal changes in the structure of the male mosaic signal. Can. J. Zool. Rev. Can. Zool. 67, 1767-1777. doi:10.1139/z89-253
24. Maynard Smith J, Parker GA. 1976 The logic of asymmetric contests. Anim. Behav. 24, 159-175. doi:10.1016/s0003-34727680110-8
25. Kokko H. 2013 Dyadic contests: modelling fights between two individuals. In Animal contests eds ICW Hardy, M Briffa, pp. 5-32. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Candolin U. 1997 Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 81-87. doi:10.1007/s002650050367
27. Candolin U. 2000 Increased signalling effort when survival prospects decrease: male-male competition ensures honesty. Anim. Behav. 60, 417-422. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1481
28. Candolin U. 1999 The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim. Behav. 58, 1261-1267. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1259
29. Heuschele J, Mannerla M, Gienapp P, Candolin U. 2009 Environment-dependent use of mate choice cues in sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. 20, 1223-1227. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp123
30. Rowe MP, Baube CL, Phillips JB. 2006 Trying to see red through stickleback photoreceptors: functional substitution of receptor sensitivities. Ethology 112, 218-229. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01151.x
31. Milinski M, Griffiths S, Wegner KM, Reusch TBH, Haas-Assenbaum A, Boehm T. 2005 Mate choice decisions of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4414-4418. doi:10.1073/pnas.0408264102
32. Mazzi D, Kunzler R, Bakker TCM. 2003 Female preference for symmetry in computer-animated three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 54, 156-161. doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0609-0
33. Head ML, Kozak GM, Boughman JW. 2013 Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks. Ecol. Evol. 3, 2183-2196. doi:10.1002/ece3.631
34. Braithwaite VA, Barber I. 2000 Limitations to colourbased sexual preferences in three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, 413-416. doi:10.1007/s002650050684
35. Royle NJ, Smiseth PT, Kölliker M. 2012 The evolution of parental care. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.