Interplay of cell dynamics and epithelial tension during morphogenesis of the Drosophila pupal wing

eLife

Volumn 4, Issue JUNE2015, 2015, Pages

  Etournay, Raphaël ^a   Popović, Marko ^b   Merkel, Matthias ^b   Nandi, Amitabha ^b   Blasse, Corinna ^a   Aigouy, Benoît ^c   Brandl, Holger ^a   Myers, Gene ^a   Salbreux, Guillaume ^b,d   Jülicher, Frank ^b   Eaton, Suzanne ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d THE FRANCIS CRICK INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; MATRIX PROTEIN; UVOMORULIN;

ABLATION DEVICE; ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CELL ELONGATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRESS; DROSOPHILA; DYNAMICS; EPITHELIUM; FORELIMB; GENE MUTATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MORPHOGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PUPA; SHEAR RATE; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; EMBRYOLOGY; EPITHELIUM CELL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; WING;

ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; DROSOPHILA; EPITHELIAL CELLS; EPITHELIUM; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PUPA; WINGS, ANIMAL;

EID: 84943609025     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07090     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abouchar L, Petkova MD, Steinhardt CR, Gregor T. 2014. Fly wing vein patterns have spatial reproducibility of a single cell. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface / The Royal Society 11:20140443. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0443.
2. Adrian RJ, Westerweel J. 2011. Particle image velocimetry. New York: Cambridge. ISBN: 9780521440080.
3. Aigouy B, Farhadifar R, Staple DB, Sagner A, Röper JC, Jülicher F, Eaton S. 2010. Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila. Cell 142:773-786. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.07.042.
4. Bambardekar K, Clément R, Blanc O, Chardès C, Lenne PF. 2015. Direct laser manipulation reveals the mechanics of cell contacts in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 112:1416-1421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418732112.
5. Basan M, Prost J, Joanny JF, Elgeti J. 2011. Dissipative particle dynamics simulations for biological tissues: rheology and competition. Physical Biology 8:026014. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/2/026014.
6. Beloussov LV, Louchinskaia NN, Stein AA. 2000. Tension-dependent collective cell movements in the early gastrula ectoderm of Xenopus laevis embryos. Development Genes and Evolution 210:92-104. doi: 10.1007/s004270050015.
7. Bertet C, Sulak L, Lecuit T. 2004. Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation. Nature 429:667-671. doi: 10.1038/nature02590.
8. Blanchard GB, Kabla AJ, Schultz NL, Butler LC, Sanson B, Gorfinkiel N, Mahadevan L, Adams RJ. 2009. Tissue tectonics: morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nature Methods 6:458-464. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1327.
9. Bosveld F, Bonnet I, Guirao B, Tlili S, Wang Z, Petitalot A, Marchand R, Bardet PL, Marcq P, Graner F, Belläıche Y. 2012. Mechanical control of morphogenesis by Fat/Dachsous/Four-jointed planar cell polarity pathway. Science 336:724-727. doi: 10.1126/science.1221071.
10. Brodland GW, Chen DIL, Veldhuis JH. 2006. A cell-based constitutive model for embryonic epithelia and other planar aggregates of biological cells. International Journal of Plasticity 22:965-995. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.05.002.
11. Brodland GW, Viens D, Veldhuis JH. 2007. A new cell-based FE model for the mechanics of embryonic epithelia. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 10:121-128. doi: 10.1080/10255840601124704.
12. Butler LC, Blanchard GB, Kabla AJ, Lawrence NJ, Welchman DP, Mahadevan L, Adams RJ, Sanson B. 2009. Cell shape changes indicate a role for extrinsic tensile forces in Drosophila germ-band extension. Nature Cell Biology 11:859-864. doi: 10.1038/ncb1894.
13. Carmon A, Topbas F, Baron M, MacIntyre RJ. 2010. Dumpy interacts with a large number of genes in the developing wing of Drosophila melanogaster. Fly 4:117-127. doi: 10.4161/fly.4.2.11953.
14. Chen HH, Brodland GW. 2000. Cell-level finite element studies of viscous cells in planar aggregates. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 122:394-401. doi: 10.1115/1.1286563.
15. Classen AK, Aigouy B, Giangrande A, Eaton S. 2008. Imaging Drosophila pupal wing morphogenesis. Methods in Molecular biology 420:265-275. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-583-1_16.
16. Classen AK, Anderson KI, Marois E, Eaton S. 2005. Hexagonal packing of Drosophila wing epithelial cells by the planar cell polarity pathway. Developmental Cell 9:805-817. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.10.016.
17. Dong B, Hannezo E, Hayashi S. 2014. Balance between apical membrane growth and luminal matrix resistance determines epithelial tubule shape. Cell Reports 7:941-950. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.066.
18. Doyle K, Hogan J, Lester M, Collier S. 2008. The Frizzled planar cell polarity signaling pathway controls Drosophila wing topography. Developmental Biology 317:354-367. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.041.
19. Drasdo D, Kree R, McCaskill JS. 1995. Monte Carlo approach to tissue-cell populations. Physical Review E, Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics 52:6635-6657. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.6635.
20. Eaton S, Julicher F. 2011. Cell flow and tissue polarity patterns. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 21: 747-752. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.08.010.
21. Farhadifar R, Röper JC, Aigouy B, Eaton S, Jülicher F. 2007. The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Current Biology 17:2095-2104. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.049.
22. Garcia-Bellido A, Cortes F, Milan M. 1994. Cell interactions in the control of size in Drosophila wings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 91:10222-10226. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.10222.
23. Graner F, Dollet B, Raufaste C, Marmottant P. 2008. Discrete rearranging disordered patterns, part I: robust statistical tools in two or three dimensions. The European Physical Journal. E, Soft Matter 25:349-369. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2007-10298-8.
24. Graner F, Glazier JA. 1992. Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Physical Review Letters 69:2013-2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2013.
25. Grill SW, Gönczy P, Stelzer EH, Hyman AA. 2001. Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Nature 409:630-633. doi: 10.1038/35054572.
26. Harris AR, Peter L, Bellis J, Baum B, Kabla AJ, Charras GT. 2012. Characterizing the mechanics of cultured cell monolayers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 109:16449-16454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213301109.
27. Heisenberg CP, Bellaiche Y. 2013. Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell 153:948-962. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008.
28. Honda H, Kodama R, Takeuchi T, Yamanaka H, Watanabe K, Eguchi G. 1984. Cell behaviour in a polygonal cell sheet. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 83(Suppl):313-327.
29. Huang J, Zhou W, Dong W, Watson AM, Hong Y. 2009. From the cover: directed, efficient, and versatile modifications of the Drosophila genome by genomic engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 106:8284-8289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900641106.
30. Hunter JD. 2007. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Computing in Science and Engineering 9:90-95. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55.
31. Hutson MS, Tokutake Y, Chang MS, Bloor JW, Venakides S, Kiehart DP, Edwards GS. 2003. Forces for morphogenesis investigated with laser microsurgery and quantitative modeling. Science 300:145-149. doi: 10.1126/science.1079552.
32. Irvine KD, Wieschaus E. 1994. Cell intercalation during Drosophila germband extension and its regulation by pairrule segmentation genes. Development 120:827-841.
33. Jones E, Oliphant T, Peterson P. 2001. SciPy: open source scientific tools for Python. URL: http://www.scipy.org/.
34. Kaballo W. 2013. Aufbaukurs Funktionalanalysis und Operatortheorie. Distributionen - lokalkonvexe Methoden-Spektraltheorie. Berlin: Springer Spektrum. ISBN: 3642377939.
35. Keller R. 2012. Developmental biology. Physical biology returns to morphogenesis. Science 338:201-203. doi: 10.1126/science.1230718.
36. Kruse K, Joanny JF, Julicher F, Prost J, Sekimoto K. 2005. Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics. The European Physical Journal. E, Soft Matter 16:5-16. doi: 10.1140/epje/e2005-00002-5.
37. Lecuit T, Lenne PF. 2007. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8:633-644. doi: 10.1038/nrm2222.
38. Mao Y, Tournier AL, Bates PA, Gale JE, Tapon N, Thompson BJ. 2011. Planar polarization of the atypical myosin Dachs orients cell divisions in Drosophila. Genes & Development 25:131-136. doi: 10.1101/gad.610511.
39. Marinari E, Mehonic A, Curran S, Gale J, Duke T, Baum B. 2012. Live-cell delamination counterbalances epithelial growth to limit tissue overcrowding. Nature 484:542-545. doi: 10.1038/nature10984.
40. Marmottant P, Raufaste C, Graner F. 2008. Discrete rearranging disordered patterns, part II: 2D plasticity, elasticity and flow of a foam. The European Physical journal. E, Soft Matter 25:371-384. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2007-10300-7.
41. Merkel M, Sagner A, Gruber FS, Etournay R, Blasse C, Myers E, Eaton S, Ju¨ licher F. 2014. The balance of prickle/spiny-legs isoforms controls the amount of coupling between core and fat PCP systems. Current Biology 24: 2111-2123. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.005.
42. Merkel M. 2014. From cells to tissues: Remodeling and polarity reorientation in epithelial tissues. PhD thesis. Technische Universität Dresden. URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-156597.
43. Nagaoka T, Inutsuka A, Begum K, Bin hafiz KM, Kishi M. 2014. Vangl2 regulates E-cadherin in epithelial cells. Scientific Reports 4:6940. doi: 10.1038/srep06940.
44. Pérez F, Granger BE. 2007. IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing. Computing in Science and Engineering 9:21-29. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53.
45. Preibisch S, Saalfeld S, Tomancak P. 2009. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics 25:1463-1465. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184.
46. Puliafito A, Hufnagel L, Neveu P, Streichan S, Sigal A, Fygenson DK, Shraiman BI. 2012. Collective and single cell behavior in epithelial contact inhibition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 109:739-744. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007809109.
47. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
48. Ranft J, Basan M, Elgeti J, Joanny JF, Prost J, Julicher F. 2010. Fluidization of tissues by cell division and apoptosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 107:20863-20868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011086107.
49. Rauzi M, Lenne PF, Lecuit T. 2010. Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling. Nature 468:1110-1114. doi: 10.1038/nature09566.
50. Rauzi M, Verant P, Lecuit T, Lenne PF. 2008. Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis. Nature Cell Biology 10:1401-1410. doi: 10.1038/ncb1798.
51. Rogulja D, Rauskolb C, Irvine KD. 2008. Morphogen control of wing growth through the Fat signaling pathway. Developmental Cell 15:309-321. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.003.
52. Sawyer JK, Choi W, Jung KC, He L, Harris NJ, Peifer M. 2011. A contractile actomyosin network linked to adherens junctions by Canoe/afadin helps drive convergent extension. Molecular Biology of the Cell 22:2491-2508. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0411.
53. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9:676-682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019.
54. Skoglund P, Rolo A, Chen X, Gumbiner BM, Keller R. 2008. Convergence and extension at gastrulation require a myosin IIB-dependent cortical actin network. Development 135:2435-2444. doi: 10.1242/dev.014704.
55. Stern B, Ried G, Clegg NJ, Grigliatti TA, Lehner CF. 1993. Genetic analysis of the Drosophila cdc2 homolog. Development 117:219-232.
56. Streichan SJ, Hoerner CR, Schneidt T, Holzer D, Hufnagel L. 2014. Spatial constraints control cell proliferation in tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 111:5586-5591. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323016111.
57. Sturtevant AH, Bridges CB, Morgan TH, Morgan LV, Li JC. 1929. Contributions to the Genetics of Drosophila Simulans and Drosophila Melanogaster. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington.
58. Tange O. 2011. GNU parallel—the command-line power tool. login: The USENIX Magazine 36:42-47. http://www.gnu.org/s/parallel.
59. van der Walt S, Colbert SC, Varoquaux G. 2011. The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation. Computing in Science and Engineering 13:22-30. doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37.
60. Waddington C. 1940. The genetic control of wing development in Drosophila. Journal of Genetics 41:75-140. doi: 10.1007/BF02982977.
61. Waddington CH. 1939. Preliminary notes on the development of the wings in normal and mutant strains of Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 25:299-307. doi: 10.1073/pnas.25.7.299.
62. Warrington SJ, Strutt H, Strutt D. 2013. The Frizzled-dependent planar polarity pathway locally promotes Ecadherin turnover via recruitment of RhoGEF2. Development 140:1045-1054. doi: 10.1242/dev.088724.
63. Weigmann K, Cohen SM, Lehner CF. 1997. Cell cycle progression, growth and patterning in imaginal discs despite inhibition of cell division after inactivation of Drosophila Cdc2 kinase. Development 124:3555-3563.
64. Wilkin MB, Becker MN, Mulvey D, Phan I, Chao A, Cooper K, Chung HJ, Campbell ID, Baron M, MacIntyre R. 2000. Drosophila dumpy is a gigantic extracellular protein required to maintain tension at epidermal-cuticle attachment sites. Current Biology 10:559-567. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00482-6.