User- tailored plan generation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 407, Issue , 1999, Pages 45-54

  Küpper, Detlef ^a   Kobsa, Alfred ^a  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FIT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ADVICE GIVING; CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; PLAN GENERATION; TWO-PHASE PROCESS; USER MODELING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84943600427     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-2490-1_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bauer, M. (1996). Acquisition of user preferences for plan recognition. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on User Modeling, Kailua-Kona, HI, 105-112.
2. Brachman, R., and Schmolze, J. (1985). An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science 9:171-216.
3. Breuker, J., ed. (1990). EUROHELP: Developing Intelligent Help Systems. EC, Kopenhagen.
4. Bylander, T. (1991). Complexity results for planning. In Proceedings of 12th International Joint Conference on Artificiallntelligence, Sidney, Australia, 274-279.
5. Carberry, S. (1990). Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Cohen, P. (1978). On knowing what to say: planning speech acts. Tech.Report 118, Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
7. Devanbu, P., and Litman, D. (1996). Taxonomie plan reasoning. Artificial lntelligence 84:1-35.
8. Erol, K., Hendler, J., and Nau, D. (1994). Semantics for hierarchical task-network planning. Tech.Report CS-TR-3239, Computer Science Dept., University ofMaryland.
9. Erol, K., Nau, D., and Subrahmanian, V. (1995). Complexity, decidability and undecidability results for domain-independent planning. Artificial Intelligence 76:75-88.
10. Horacek, H. (1997). A model for adapting explanations to the user’s likely inferences. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 7:1-55.
11. Kautz, H. (1991). A formal theory ofplan recognition and its implementation. In Reasoning about Plans, Allen, Kautz, Pelavin, and Tenenberg, eds., Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. 69-126.
12. Kobsa, A. (1991). Utilizing knowledge: the components of the SB-ONE knowledge representation workbench. In Principles of Semantic Networks, Sowa, J., ed., Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA. 457-486.
13. Kobsa, A., Müller, D., and Nill, A. (1994). KN-AHS: an adaptive hypertext client of the user modeling system BGP-MS. Proceedings ofthe 4th International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, 99-105.
14. Kobsa, A., and Pohl, W. (1995). The BGP-MS user modeling system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4:59-106.
15. McCoy, K. (1989). Generating context-sensitive responses to object-related misconceptions. Artificial Intelligence 41:157-195.
16. McDermott, D., and Hendler, J. (1995). Planning: what it is, what it could be. Artificial Intelligence 76:1-16.
17. Penberthy, J., and Weld, D. (1992). UCPOP: A sound, complete, partial order planner for ADL. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference KR’92, Cambridge, MA, 103-114.
18. Pohl, W., and Höhle, J. (1997). Mechanisms for flexible representation and use of knowledge in user modeling shell systems. In User Modeling: Proceedings ofthe 6th International Conference, UM97, Chia Laguna, Italy, 403-414.
19. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A Modem Approach. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle, River, NJ.
20. Sacerdoti, E. (1977). A Structure for Plansand Behavior. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, London, NewYork.
21. Samer, M., and Carberry, S. (1992). Generating tailored definitions using a multifaceted user model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2:181-210.
22. Sleeman, D. (1985). UMFE: A user modelling front-end subsystem. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 23:71-88.
23. Weida, R., and Litman, D. (1992). Terminological reasoning with constraint networks and an application to plan recognition. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference KR’92, Cambridge, MA, 282-293.
24. Weld, D. (1994). An introduction to least commitment planning. AI Magazine 4:27-61.
25. Young, M. (1996). Using plan reasoning in the generation of plan descriptions. In Proceedings of 13th National Conference on Artificiallntelligence, Portland, OR, 1075-1080.
26. Zukerman, I., and McConachy, R. (1993). Generating concise discourse that addresses a user’s inferences. In Proceedings of 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, France, 1202-1207.