Control for stochastic sampling variation and qualitative sequencing error in next generation sequencing

Biomolecular Detection and Quantification

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages 30-37

  Blomquist, Thomas ^a   Crawford, Erin L ^a   Yeo, Jiyoun ^a   Zhang, Xiaolu ^a   Willey, James C ^a  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF OHIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostics; Internal standards; NGS; Sequencing; Targeted

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

AMPLICON; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; HUMAN; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES; SAMPLING;

EID: 84943583637     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22147535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bdq.2015.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mortazavi A., Williams B.A., McCue K., Schaeffer L., Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:621-628.
2. Spencer D.H., Tyagi M., Vallania F., Bredemeyer A.J., Pfeifer J.D., et al. Performance of common analysis methods for detecting low-frequency single nucleotide variants in targeted next-generation sequence data. J. Mol. Diagn. 2014, 16:75-88.
3. Cibulskis K., Lawrence M.S., Carter S.L., Sivachenko A., Jaffe D., et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:213-219.
4. Fu G.K., Xu W., Wilhelmy J., Mindrinos M.N., Davis R.W., et al. Molecular indexing enables quantitative targeted RNA sequencing and reveals poor efficiencies in standard library preparations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014, 111:1891-1896.
5. Schmitt M.W., Kennedy S.R., Salk J.J., Fox E.J., Hiatt J.B., et al. Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:14508-14513.
6. Gargis A.S., Kalman L., Berry M.W., Bick D.P., Dimmock D.P., et al. Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30:1033-1036.
7. Aziz N., Zhao Q., Bry L., Driscoll D.K., Funke B., et al. College of American Pathologists' laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing clinical tests. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2015, 139:481-493.
8. Gargis A.S., Kalman L., Bick D.P., da S., ilva C., Dimmock D.P., et al. Good laboratory practice for clinical next-generation sequencing informatics pipelines. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33:689-693.
9. Frampton G.M., Fichtenholtz A., Otto G.A., Wang K., Downing S.R., et al. Development and validation of a clinical cancer genomic profiling test based on massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:1023-1031.
10. Xu H., DiCarlo J., Satya R.V., Peng Q., Wang Y. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:244.
11. Casbon J.A., Osborne R.J., Brenner S., Lichtenstein C.P. A method for counting PCR template molecules with application to next-generation sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:e81.
12. Jabara C.B., Jones C.D., Roach J., Anderson J.A., Swanstrom R. Accurate sampling and deep sequencing of the HIV-1 protease gene using a Primer ID. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:20166-20171.
13. Kinde I., Wu J., Papadopoulos N., Kinzler K.W., Vogelstein B. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:9530-9535.
14. Blomquist T.M., Crawford E.L., Lovett J.L., Yeo J., Stanoszek L.M., et al. Targeted RNA-sequencing with competitive multiplex-PCR amplicon libraries. PLoS One 2013, 8:e79120.
15. Blomquist T., Crawford E.L., Mullins D., Yoon Y., Hernandez D.A., et al. Pattern of antioxidant and DNA repair gene expression in normal airway epithelium associated with lung cancer diagnosis. Cancer Res. 2009, 69:8629-8635.
16. Yeo J., Crawford E.L., Blomquist T.M., Stanoszek L.M., Dannemiller R.E., et al. A multiplex two-color real-time PCR method for quality-controlled molecular diagnostic testing of FFPE samples. PLoS One 2014, 9:e89395.