A systemic framework for sustainability assessment

Ecological Economics

Volumn 119, Issue , 2015, Pages 314-325

  Sala, Serenella ^a   Ciuffo, Biagio ^a   Nijkamp, Peter ^b,c  

^a EUROPEAN COMMISSION   (Belgium)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Boundaries; Integrated assessment; Policy option assessment; Policy support; Science policy interface; Sustainability assessment; Sustainability science

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL METHOD; INTEGRATED APPROACH; KNOWLEDGE; META-ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 84943571675     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bohringer C., Jochem P.E.P. Measuring the immeasurable - a survey of sustainability indices. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:1-8.
2. Bond A.J., Dockerty T., Lovett A., Riche A.B., Haughton A.J., Bohan D.A., Sage R.B., Shield I.F., Finch J.W., Turner M.M., Karp A. Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in sustainability appraisal. Regional Studies 2011, 45(8):1157-1170.
3. Boschetti F. A graphical representation of uncertainty in complex decision making. Emerg. Comp. Organ. 2011, 13(1-2):146-166.
4. Castellani V., Sala S. Sustainable performance index for tourism policy development. Tour. Manag. 2009, 31:871-880.
5. Castellani V., Sala S. Ecological footprint and life cycle assessment in the sustainability assessment of tourism activities. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 16:135-147.
6. Castellani V., Piazzalunga A., Sala S. Research findings and decision making: the case of renewable energy. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2013, 25:22. 10.1186/2190-4715-25-22.
7. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Strategy for Sustainable Development COM(2001) 264 Final 2001.
8. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) Europe 2020. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Communication From the Commission COM (2010) 2020 Final 2010.
9. Clark W.C., Dickson N.M. Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:8059-8061.
10. Uncertainty in Industrial Practice. A Guide to Quantitative Uncertainty Management 2008, Wiley, Chichester. E. de Rocquigny, N. Devictor, S. Tarantola (Eds.).
11. Devuyst D. How Green is the City? Sustainability Assessment and the Management of Urban Environments 2001, 457. Columbia University Press, New York.
12. EC-JRC (2011). Recommendations based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors for Life Cycle Assessment in European context. ILCD Handbook - International Reference Life Cycle Data System, European Union EUR24571EN. ISBN 978-92-79-17451-3. (Available at ). http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu.
13. Finnveden G., Moberg A. Environmental systems analysis tools - an overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13:1165-1173.
14. Funtowicz S.O., Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993, 25:739-755.
15. Gallopin G. Science and technology, sustainability and sustainable development. ECLAC, LC/R.2081 2001, 30.
16. Gasparatos A., El-Haram M., Horner M. A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28:286-311.
17. Gasparatos A. Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91:1613-1622.
18. Gibbons M., Limoges M., Nowotny C., Schwartzman H., Scott S., Trow M. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies 1994, 179. Thousand Oaks, London. 1st ed.
19. Gutes M.C. Commentary: the concept of weak sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 1996, 17:147-156.
20. Hacking T., Guthrie P. A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated and sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28(2-3):73-89.
21. Hansen, J. (2009). Storms of my grandchildren. Bloomsbury USA ISBN-13: 978-1608192007.
22. Huesemann M.H. The inherent biases in environmental research and their effects on public policy. Futures 2002, 34:621-633.
23. Jahn T. Transdisciplinarity in the practice of research. Transdisziplinare Forschung: Integrative Forschungsprozesse verstehen und bewerten 2008, 21-37. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. M. Bergmann, E. Schramm (Eds.).
24. Jeswani H.K., Azapagic A., Schepelmann P., Ritthoff M. Options for broadening and deepening the LCA approaches. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18:120-127.
25. Kates R.W., Clark W.C., Corell R., Hall J.M., Jaeger C.C., Lowe I., McCarthy J.J., Schellnhuber H.J., Bolin B., Dickson N.M., Faucheux S., Gallopin G.C., Grubler A., Huntley B., Jager J., Jodha N.S., Kasperson R.E., Mabogunje A., Matson P., Mooney H., Moore B., O'Riordan T., Svedin U. Environment and development: sustainability science. Science 2001, 292:641-642.
26. Kissinger M., Rees W.E., Timmer V. Interregional sustainability: governance and policy in an ecologically interdependent world. Environ. Sci. Pol. 2011, 14(8):965-976.
27. Komiyama H., Takeuchi K. Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain. Sci. 2006, 1:1-6.
28. Lang D.J., Wiek A., Bergmann M., Stauffacher M., Martens P., Moll P., Swilling M., Christopher J., Thomas C.J. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7(1):25-43.
29. Mayer A.L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ. Int. 2008, 34:277-291.
30. Moberg Å. Environmental systems analytical tools differences and similarities including a brief case study on heat production using ecological footprint, MIPS, LCA and exergy analysis. Master Degree thesis 1999, Systemekologiska Institutionen, Stockholms Universitet.
31. Narain Mathur V., Price A.D.F., Austin S. Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment. Constr. Manage. Econ. 2008, 26(6):601-609.
32. Nakano K., Hirao M. Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19(11):1189-1197.
33. Ness E., Piirsalu U., Anderberg S., Olsson L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60:498-508.
34. Nijkamp P. Ceteris paribus, spatial complexity and spatial equilibrium. An interpretative perspective. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2007, 37:509-516.
35. OECD OECD environmental indicators - development, measurement and use. Reference Paper, Paris 2003.
36. Osorio L.A.R., Lobato M.O., Del Castillo X.Á. An epistemology for sustainability science: a proposal for the study of the health/disease phenomenon. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World 2009, 16(1):48-60.
37. O'Connor M. Paradigm for sustainability assessment: inventory of costs and benefits versus representative diversity of indicators. Background Paper in Support of the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounts (SEEA) 2010 Reform Process 2007.
38. Pappenberger F., Beven K.J. Ignorance is bliss: or seven reasons not to use uncertainty analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42(5). (art. no. W05302).
39. Patterson M. Is there more in common than we think? Convergence of ecological footprinting, energy analysis, life cycle assessment and other methods of sustainability assessment. Proceedings of ISEE 2010 Conference "Advancing Sustainability in Time of Crisis" 2010, retrieved from http://www.isee2010.org/full_papers.php?level=0&cat=speaker&subcat=p, accessed February 2012.
40. Pinter L., Hardi P., Martinuzzi A., Hall J. Bellagio STAMP: principles for sustainability assessment and measurement. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 17:20-28.
41. Polasky S., Carpenter S.R., Folke C., Keeler B. Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26(8):398-404.
42. Pope J., Annandale D., Morrison-Saunders A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 2004, 23(4):293-302.
43. Pope J. Editorial: what's so special about sustainability assessment?. J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manage. 2006, 8(3).
44. Rockström J., Steffen W., Noone K., Persson Å., Chapin F.S., Lambin E., Lenton T.M., Scheffer M., Folke C., Schellnhuber H., Nykvist B., De Wit C.A., Hughes T., van der Leeuw S., Rodhe H., Sörlin S., Snyder P.K., Costanza R., Svedin U., Falkenmark M., Karlberg L., Corell R.W., Fabry V.J., Hansen J., Walker B., Liverman D., Richardson K., Crutzen P., Foley J. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14(2):32.
45. Sala S., Castellani V. Technology sustainability assessment to support decision making on energy production at local scale. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2011, 6(3):251-220.
46. Sala S., Farioli F., Zamagni A. Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment (part I). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2013, 18:1653-1672. 10.1007/s11367-012-0508-6.
47. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Anres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Saisana M., Tarantola S. Global Sensitivity Analysis - The Primer 2008, Wiley, Chichester.
48. Singh R.K., Murty H.R., Gupta S.K., Dikshit A.K. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 9(2):89-112.
49. Stokes D.E. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation 1997, 180. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
50. Thabrew L., Wiek A., Ries R. Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17(1):67-76.
51. Turner B.L., Kasperson R.E., Matson P.A., McCarthy J.J., Corell R.W., Christensen L., Eckley N., Kasperson J.X., Luers A., Martello M.L., Polsky C., Pulsipher A., Schiller A. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:8074-8079.
52. UN Agenda 21 1992, (http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml (accessed March 2012).
53. UN Millennium Development Goals 2000, (http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (accessed March 2012)).
54. UN United Nations Secretary-general's High-level Panel on Global Sustainability. Resilient People, Resilient Planet: A Future Worth Choosing 2012, United Nations, New York.
55. Verheem R. Recommendations for sustainability assessment in the Netherlands. In commission for EIA. Environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Views From the Commission for EIA in 2002. The Netherlands 2002.
56. WCDE (World Commission on Environment and Development) Our Common Future 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
57. Wickson F., Carew A.L., Russell A.W. Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures 2006, 38:1046-1059.
58. Wiek A., Ness B., Schweizer-Ries P., Brand F., Farioli F. From complex systems thinking to transformational change: a comparative study on the epistemological and methodological challenges in sustainability science projects. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7(s1):5-24.
59. Wiek A., Farioli F., Fukushi K., Yarime M. Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society. Sustain. Sci. 2012, 7(s1):1-4.