Behavioral implications of big data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions

Accounting Horizons

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 451-468

  Brown Liburd, Helen ^a   Issa, Hussein ^a   Lombardi, Danielle ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Audit judgment; Big data; Data analytics; Information processing weaknesses

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943526799     PISSN: 08887993     EISSN: 15587975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/acch-51023     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Alles, M., G. Brennan, A. Kogan, and M. Vasarhelyi. 2006. Continuous monitoring of business process controls: A pilot implementation of a continuous auditing system at Siemens. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 7 (2): 137-161.
2. Alles, M., A. Kogan, and M. Vasarhelyi. 2008. Putting continuous auditing theory into practice: Lessons from two pilot implementations. Journal of Information 22 (2): 195-214.
3. Alles, M. 2013. Developing a Framework for the Role of Big Data in Auditing: A Synthesis of the Literature. Working paper, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
4. Alles, M. 2014. Drivers of the Adoption and Facilitators of the Evolution of Big Data by the Audit Profession. Working paper, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
5. Asare, S., G. Trompeter, and A. Wright. 2000. The effect of accountability and time budgets on auditors' testing strategies judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (4): 539-560.
6. Asare, S. K., and A. M. Wright. 2004. The effectiveness of alternate risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting. Contemporary Accounting Research 21 (2): 325-352.
7. Ashton, R. H. 1974. Behavioral implications of information overload in managerial accounting reports. Cost and Management 48 (4): 37-40.
8. Backof, A. G., M. E. Bamber, and T. Carpenter. 2014. Do auditor judgment frameworks help in constraining aggressive reporting: Evidence under more precise and less precise accounting standards. (May 17, 2014). CAAA Annual Conference. Available at: http://http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=1982041.
9. Bawden, D. 2001. Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation 57 (2): 218-259.
10. Bedard, J. C., and S. R. Biggs. 1991a. Pattern recognition, hypotheses generation, and auditor performance in an analytical task. The Accounting Review 66 (3): 622-642.
11. Bedard, J. C., and S. R. Biggs. 1991b. The effect of domain-specific experience on evaluation of management representations in analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Supplement) 77-90.
12. Been, R. 2013. Data mining personalizes direct mail. Automotive News 87 (6583): 3-32.
13. Benbasat, I., and R. N. Taylor. 1982. Behavioral aspects of information processing for the design of management information systems. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man and Cybernetics 12 (4): 439-450. Available at: http://cpe. njit. edu/dlnotes/CIS/CIS732_447/Cis732_4R. pdf.
14. Bernier, P. 2013. Getting personal. Customer (Technology Marketing Corporation) 31 (7): 8.
15. Bierstaker, J. L., J. C. Bedard, and S. F. Biggs. 1999. The role of problem representation shifts in auditor decision processes in analytical procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18 (1): 18-36.
16. Biggs, S. F., and J. J. Wild. 1985. An investigation of auditor judgment in analytical review. The Accounting Review: 607-633.
17. Blay, A. D. 2005. Independence threats, litigation risk, and the auditor's decision process. Contemporary Accounting Research 22: 759-789.
18. Bochkay, K., and C. Levine. 2013. Using MD&A to improve earnings forecasts. Available at: http://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2253054.
19. Bonner, S. E., and B. L. Lewis. 1990. Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Supplement): 1-20.
20. Brazel, J. F., and C. P. Agoglia. 2007. An examination of auditor planning judgments in a complex accounting information system environment. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (4): 1059-1083.
21. Buchanan, J., and N. Kock. 2001. Information overload: A decision making perspective. In Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium, 29-58. Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
22. Casey, C. J. Jr. 1980. Variation in accounting information load: The effect on loan officers' prediction of bankruptcy. The Accounting Review (January): 36-49.
23. Chewning, E. G. Jr., and A. M. Harrell. 1990. The effect of information load on decision makers' cue utilization levels and decision quality in a financial distress decision task. Accounting, Organizations and Society 527-542.
24. Coakley, J. R., and C. E. Brown. 1993. Artificial neural networks applied to ratio analysis in the analytical review process. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 2 (1): 19-39.
25. Conn, J. 2013. Pairing up. Modern Healthcare 43 (24): 8-9.
26. Costonis, M. 2012. Big Data. Best's Review 113 (1): 80.
27. Costonis, M. 2013. Tackling Big Data. Best's Review (July): 93.
28. Cukier, K., and V. Mayer-Schoenberger. 2013. The rise of Big Data: How it's changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs (May/June).
29. Davenport, T. H., P. Barth, and R. Bean. 2012. How Big Data is different. MIT Sloan Management Review 54 (1): 43-46.
30. Davis, F. D. 1985. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31. Debreceny, R., G. L. Gray, W. Tham, K. Goh, and P. Tang. 2003. The development of embedded audit modules to support continuous monitoring in the electronic commerce environment. (February): 169-185.
32. Dowling, C., and S. Leech. 2007. Audit support systems and decision aids: Current practice and opportunities for future research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 8 (2): 92-116.
33. Driver, M. J., and T. J. Mock. 1975. Human information processing, decision style theory, and accounting information systems. The Accounting Review: 490-508.
34. Ede, A. 2013. There's gold in them thar fans. NZ Marketing Magazine (November): 70-71.
35. Einhorn, H. J., and R. M. Hogarth. 1986. Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin 99 (1): 3-19.
36. Eining, M. M., D. R. Jones, and J. K. Loebbecke. 1997. Reliance on decision aids: An examination of auditors' assessment of management fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 16 (2): 1-19.
37. Eppler, M. J., and J. Mengis. 2004. The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society 20 (5): 325-344.
38. Gartner Research. 2014. Gartner IT Glossary. Available at: http://www. gartner. com/it-glossary/?s=bigþdata.
39. Golia, N. 2013. What Big Data means for infrastructure costs. Insurance and Technology (May): 30-31.
40. Gray, G. L., and R. S. Debreceny. 2013. A Taxonomy to Guide Research on the Application of Data Mining to Fraud Detection in Financial Statement Audits. Working paper, California State University, Northridge.
41. Hackenbrack, K. 1992. Implications of seemingly irrelevant evidence in audit judgment. Journal of Accounting Research 30 (1): 126-136.
42. Hall, K. 2012. Technology transforms how Aviva takes its insurance models to market. Computer Weekly (June): 8.
43. Hamilton, B. 2013. Impacts of Big Data. Health Management Technology (August): 12-13.
44. Harris, C. 2013. Diving into Big Data. Canadian Underwriter (February): 28-36.
45. Herbig, P. A., and H. Kramer. 1994. The effect of information overload on the innovation choice process: Innovation overload. Journal of Consumer Marketing 11 (2): 45-54.
46. Hodge, M. H., and L. S. Reid. 1971. The influence of similarity between relevant and irrelevant information upon a complex identification task. Perception and Psychophysics 10 (4): 193-196.
47. Hoffman, V. B., and J. M. Patton. 1997. Accountability, the dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors' fraud judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (2): 227-237.
48. Hughes, P. 2013. Making waves. Best's Review 114 (4): 44.
49. Humpherys, S. L., K. C. Moffitt, M. B. Burns, J. K. Burgoon, and W. F. Felix. 2011. Identification of fraudulent financial statements using linguistic credibility analysis. Decision Support Systems 50 (3): 585-594.
50. Hyle, R. R. 2006. The Path to Success: Or the Road to Ruin? Techdecisions for Insurance. Erlanger, KY: National Underwriter Company dba Summit Business Media.
51. Hyle, R. R. 2012. Blow up. Tech Decisions for Insurance 14 (3): 40-44.
52. Inbar, D. 2013. Making the most out of your data: Big Data opportunities. Siliconindia (February): 35.
53. Iselin, E. R. 1988. The effects of information load and information diversity on decision quality in a structured decision task. Accounting, Organizations and Society: 147-164.
54. Issa, H. 2013. Exceptional Exceptions. Dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
55. Issa, H., and A. Kogan. 2014. A predictive ordered logistic regression model as a tool for quality review of control risk assessments. Journal of Information Systems 28 (2): 209-229.
56. Jacoby, J. 1977. Information load and decision quality: Some contested issues. Journal of Marketing Research: 569-573.
57. Jacoby, J. 1984. Perspectives on information overload. Journal of Consumer Research: 432-435.
58. Josefowicz, M. 2013. 5 Issues driving insurer IT strategy in the next 5 years. Insurance Networking News 16 (1): 31. Available at: http://www. insurancenetworking. com/issues/2008_91/5-issues-driving-itstrategy-next-5-years-31882-1. html.
59. King, W. B. 2013. How CUs can use Big Data to drive big revenue. Credit Union Journal 17 (37): 24.
60. Kleinmuntz, B. 1990. Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin 107 (3): 296-310.
61. Kogan, A., M. G. Alles, M. A. Vasarhelyi, and J. Wu. 2011. Analytical Procedures for Continuous Data Level Auditing: Continuity Equations. Working paper, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark.
62. Legrenzi, P., V. Girotto, and P. N. Johnson-Laird. 1993. Focusing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition 49 (1): 37-66.
63. Legrenzi, P., and V. Girotto. 1996. Mental models in reasoning and decision making processes. Mental Models in Cognitive Science: 95-118.
64. Lemon, W. M., K. W. Tatum, and W. S. Turley. 2000. Developments in the Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms. London, U. K.: Auditing Practices Board.
65. Libby, R. 1985. Availability and the generation of hypotheses in analytical review. Journal of Accounting Research: 648-667.
66. Libby, R., and H. T. Tan. 1994. Modeling the determinants of audit expertise. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (November): 701-716.
67. Liyakasa, K. 2012. Big Data analytics can help improve information security. CRM Magazine 16 (1): 11.
68. Lohr, S. 2012. The age of Big Data. New York Times (Feb. 11). Available at: http://www. nytimes. com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world. html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
69. Lombardi, D. R. 2012. Using an Expert System to Debias Auditor Judgment: An Experimental Study. Dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
70. Lombardi, D. R., and R. Dull. 2013. The Development of AudEx: An Audit Data Assessment System. Working paper, Villanova University.
71. Lorinc, J. 2013. Big Data for small firms. Profit 32 (5): 9-10.
72. Lowe, D. J., and P. M. Reckers. 1997. The influence of outcome effects, decision aid usage, and intolerance of ambiguity on evaluations of professional audit judgement. International Journal of Auditing 1 (1): 43-58.
73. Luippold, B. L., and T. E. Kida. 2012. The impact of initial information ambiguity on the accuracy of analytical review judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (2): 113-129.
74. Malhotra, N. K. 1982. Information load and consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research: 419-430.
75. MacDonald, Jr., A. P. 1970. Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports 26 (3): 791-798.
76. Mansfield, D. 2013. Keepin' it clean. NZ Marketing Magazine (July): 72.
77. Martin, M. 2013. Big Data/social media combo poised to advance healthcare. HPC Source (April): 33-35.
78. McKinsey. 2011. Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity. McKinsey Global Institute (June). Available at: http://www. mckinsey. com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation.
79. Miller, D., and L. A. Gordon. 1975. Conceptual levels and the design of accounting information systems. Decision Sciences 6 (2): 259-269.
80. Moffitt, K., and M. A. Vasarhelyi. 2013. AIS in the age of Big Data. Journal of Information Systems 27 (2): 1-19.
81. Moore, K. D., K. Eyestone, and D. C. Coddington. 2013. The big deal about Big Data. Healthcare Financial Management (August): 61-68.
82. Myers, M. 2013. Credit screening and analysis tools extend to collections: Searching for peaches among unmarked cans. Business Credit 115 (8): 32-34.
83. Nelson, M. W., and W. R. Kinney, Jr. 1997. The effect of ambiguity on loss contingency reporting judgments. The Accounting Review: 257-274.
84. Nelson, M. W. 2009. A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28 (2): 1-34.
85. Nisbett, R. E., H. Zukier, and R. E. Lemley. 1981. Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology 13 (1): 248-277.
86. Norton, R. 1975. Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment 39: 607-619.
87. O' Donnell, E., and J. D. Perkins. 2011. Assessing risk with analytical procedures: Do systems-thinking tools help auditors focus on diagnostic patterns? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (4): 273-282.
88. O'Reilly, C. A. 1980. Individuals and information overload in organizations: Is more necessarily better? Academy of Management Journal 23 (4): 684-696.
89. Papagiannis, S. 2012. Staying ahead of the data tsunami. Canadian Underwriter (November): 12-15.
90. Peecher, M. E., R. Schwartz, and I. Solomon. 2007. It's all about audit quality: Perspectives on strategicsystems auditing. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32 (4): 463-485.
91. Pincus, K. V. 1989. The efficacy of a red flags questionnaire for assessing the possibility of fraud. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14 (1): 153-163.
92. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2010. Audit Evidence. Auditing Standard (AS) No. 15. Washington, DC: PCAOB.
93. Rose, S. 2012. Big Data under the microscope. Canadian Underwriter 79 (6): 20-23.
94. Rose, S. 2013. Start making sense. Canadian Underwriter 80 (3): 57-59.
95. Russom, P. 2011. Big Data analytics. TDWI Best Practices Report (Fourth Quarter).
96. Schneider, S. C. 1987. Information overload: Causes and consequences. Human Systems Management 7 (2): 143-153.
97. Schouten, P. 2013. Big Data in health care: Solving provider revenue leakage with advanced analytics. Healthcare Financial Management (February): 40-42.
98. Selby, D. 2011. Can financial statement auditors identify risk patterns in IT control evidence? International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology 1 (3).
99. Setty, K., and R. Bakhshi. 2013. What is Big Data and what does it have to do with IT audit? ISACA Journal: 3.
100. Shields, M. 2013. Erin Matts. Adweek 54 (36): 10.
101. Simnett, R. 1996. The effect of information selection, information processing and task complexity on predictive accuracy of auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (7): 699-719.
102. Sparrow, P. 1999. Strategy and cognition: Understanding the role of management knowledge structures, organizational memory, and information overload. Creativity and Innovation Management 8 (2): 140-148.
103. Stevens-Huffman, L. 2013. Profit from Big Data. Smart Business St. Louis 6 (11): 16-19.
104. Stocks, M. H., and A. Harrell. 1995. The impact of an increase in accounting information level on the judgment quality of individuals and groups. Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (7): 685-700.
105. Streufert, S. C. 1973. Effects of information relevance on decision making in complex environments. Memory and Cognition 1 (3): 224-228.
106. Strong, C. 2013. When marketing met Big Data. Market Leader (Q4): 32-35.
107. Thiprungsri, S., and M. A. Vasarhelyi. 2011. Cluster analysis for anomaly detection in accounting data: An audit approach. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 11: 6.
108. Titera, W. R. 2013. Updating audit standard-Enabling audit data analysis. Journal of Information Systems 27 (1): 325-331. Available at: http://connection. ebscohost. com/c/articles/88181973/updating-auditstandard-enabling-audit-data-analysis.
109. Vasarhelyi, M. A., and F. B. Halper. 1991. The continuous audit of online systems. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (1): 110-125.
110. Vasudeva, V. 2013. Reinventing the wheel. Best's Review 114 (1): 26-28.
111. Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 (2): 186-204.
112. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 425-478.
113. Vorhies, B. 2013. A Brief History of Big Data Technologies from SQL to NoSQL to Hadoop and Beyond. Available at: http://www. data-magnum. com/a-brief-history-of-big-data-technologies-from-sql-tonosql-to-hadoop-and-beyond.
114. Waller, W. S., and M. F. Zimbelman. 2003. A cognitive footprint in archival data: Generalizing the dilution effect from laboratory to field settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91 (2): 254-268.
115. Warner, D. 2013. Safe de-identification of Big Data is critical to health care. Managed Care Outlook (May): 9-10.
116. Well, A. D. 1971. The influence of irrelevant information on speeded classification tasks. Perception and Psychophysics 10 (2): 79-84.
117. Wilkinson, K. 2013. Usage-based insurance: Fears over privacy or safer streets? Canadian Business (October): 1.
118. Zhao, Y., and N. Harding. 2013. Improving the interpretation of complex audit evidence: The beneficial role of order effects. Abacus 49 (4): 476-505.