Effects of resistance training combined with moderate-intensity endurance or low-volume high-intensity interval exercise on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 637-642

  Currie, Katharine D ^a   Bailey, Kaitlyn J ^b   Jung, Mary E ^b   McKelvie, Robert S ^a,c   MacDonald, Maureen J ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Fitness; Quality of life; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; LIPID; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN; TRIACYLGLYCEROL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ENDURANCE TRAINING; FEMALE; FITNESS; HEART RATE; HEART REHABILITATION; HUMAN; LIPID ANALYSIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESISTANCE TRAINING; SHORT FORM 36; BLOOD; EXERCISE; HEALTH STATUS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PROCEDURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTOR;

AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEART RATE; HUMANS; LIPOPROTEINS, HDL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; PHYSICAL CONDITIONING, HUMAN; PHYSICAL EXERTION; PHYSICAL FITNESS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESISTANCE TRAINING; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84943456411     PISSN: 14402440     EISSN: 18781861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Wisloff U., Stoylen A., Loennechen J.P., et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation 2007, 115(24):3086-3094.
2. Warburton D.E., McKenzie D.C., Haykowsky M.J., et al. Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2005, 95(9):1080-1084.
3. Rognmo Ø., Hetland E., Helgerud J., et al. High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004, 11(3):216-222.
4. Currie K.D., Dubberley J.B., McKelvie R.S., et al. Low-volume, high-intensity interval training in patients with CAD. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013, 45(8):1436-1442.
5. Balady G.J., Williams M.A., Ades P.A., et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation 2007, 115(20):2675-2682.
6. Stone J.A., McCartney N., Millar P.J., et al. Risk stratification, exercise prescription, and program safety. Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and cardiovascular disease prevention: translating knowledge into action 2009, Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Winnipeg, [chapter 10]. 3rd ed. J.A. Stone (Ed.).
7. Marzolini S., Oh P.I., Brooks D. Effect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in individuals with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012, 19(1):81-94.
8. Gremeaux M., Hannequin A., Laurent Y., et al. Usefulness of the 6-minute walk test and the 200-metre fast walk test to individualize high intensity interval and continuous exercise training in coronary artery disease patients after acute coronary syndrome: a pilot controlled clinical study. Clin Rehabil 2011, 25(9):844-855.
9. Currie K.D., McKelvie R.S., MacDonald M.J. Brachial artery endothelial responses during early recovery from an exercise bout in patients with coronary artery disease. Biomed Res Int 2014, 1-8.
10. 2max during exercise testing to volitional fatigue. J Exerc Physiol Online 2000, 3(4):1-12.
11. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30(6):473-483.
12. Little J.P., Gillen J.B., Percival M.E., et al. Low-volume high-intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol 2011, 111(6):1554-1560.
13. Kavanagh T., Mertens D.J., Hamm L.F., et al. Prediction of long-term prognosis in 12169 men referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Circulation 2002, 106(6):666-671.
14. Moholdt T., Aamot I.L., Granoien I., et al. Aerobic interval training increases peak oxygen uptake more than usual care exercise training in myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2012, 26(1):33-44.
15. Moholdt T., Aamot I.L., Granoien I., et al. Long-term follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study of usual care exercise training versus aerobic interval training after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2011, 152(3):388-390.
16. 2max, and muscular force. J Strength Cond Res 2012, 26(1):138-145.
17. Rakobowchuk M., Tanguay S., Burgomaster K.A., et al. Sprint interval and traditional endurance training induce similar improvements in peripheral arterial stiffness and flow-mediated dilation in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008, 295(1):R236-R242.
18. Moholdt T.T., Amundsen B.H., Rustad L.A., et al. Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J 2009, 158(6):1031-1037.
19. Astorino T.A., Schubert M.M., Palumbo E., et al. Magnitude and time course of changes in maximal oxygen uptake in response to distinct regimens of chronic interval training in sedentary women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2013, 113(9):2361-2369.
20. Munk P.S., Staal E.M., Butt N., et al. High-intensity interval training may reduce in-stent restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation A randomized controlled trial evaluating the relationship to endothelial function and inflammation. Am Heart J 2009, 158(5):734-741.
21. Marzolini S., Oh P.I., Thomas S.G., et al. Aerobic and resistance training in coronary disease: single versus multiple sets. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008, 40(9):1557-1564.
22. Pierson L.M., Herbert W.G., Norton H.J., et al. Effects of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2001, 21(2):101-110.
23. Jette D.U., Downing J. Health status of individuals entering a cardiac rehabilitation program as measured by the medical outcomes study 36-item short-form survey (SF-36). Phys Ther 1994, 74(6):521-527.
24. Stewart A.L., Greenfield S., Hays R.D., et al. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989, 262(7):907-913.
25. Spertus J.A., Jones P., McDonell M., et al. Health status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease. Circulation 2002, 106(1):43-49.
26. Oldridge N., Guyatt G., Jones N., et al. Effects on quality of life with comprehensive rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1991, 67(13):1084-1089.
27. Beniamini Y., Rubenstein J.J., Zaichkowsky L.D., et al. Effects of high-intensity strength training on quality-of-life parameters in cardiac rehabilitation patients. Am J Cardiol 1997, 80(7):841-846.
28. Hansen D., Eijnde B.O., Roelants M., et al. Clinical benefits of the addition of lower extremity low-intensity resistance muscle training to early aerobic endurance training intervention in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2011, 43(9):800-807.
29. Worcester M.U., Murphy B.M., Mee V.K., et al. Cardiac rehabilitation programmes: predictors of non-attendance and drop-out. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004, 11(4):328-335.