Top-down composition of software architectures

Proceedings - 9th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, ECBS 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 147-156

  De Bruin, H ^a   Van Vliet, H ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer architecture; Computer science; Heart; Iterative methods; Mathematics; Software architecture; Software engineering; Software quality; Software systems; Wheels

Indexed keywords

ASPECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; HEART; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WHEELS;

ARCHITECTURAL SOLUTIONS; ASPECT-ORIENTED PROGRAMMING (AOP); COMPOSITION TECHNIQUE; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; MULTIPLE VARIABILITY; QUALITY REQUIREMENTS; SOFTWARE QUALITY; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE;

EID: 84943418028     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ECBS.2002.999833     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. Bosch. Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-Line Approach. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
2. R. Buhr. Use Case Maps as architecture entities for complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(12):1131-1155, Dec. 1998.
3. R. Buhr and R. Casselman. Use CASE Maps for Object-Oriented Systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1996.
4. H. de Bruin and H. van Vliet. Scenario-based generation and evaluation of software architectures. In J. Bosch, editor, Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Generative and Component-Based Software Engineering (GCSE'2001), Erfurt, Germany, volume 2186 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 128-139, Berlin, Germany, Sept. 10-13, 2001. Springer-Verlag.
5. D. F. D'Souza and A. C. Wills. Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach. Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1998.
6. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Mendhekar, C. Maeda, C. V. Lopes, J.-M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect-oriented programming. In M. Askit and M. Matsuoka, editors, Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP'97), Finland, volume 1241 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pages 220-242, Berlin, Germany, June 9-13, 1997. Springer-Verlag.
7. A. v. Lamsweerde. Requirements engineering in the year 00: A research perspective. In Conference Proceedings ICSE'00, pages 5-19, Limerick, Ireland, 2000. ACM.
8. L. Liu and E. Yu. From requirements to architectural design: Using goals and scenarios. In ICSE'2001 Workshop 9, From Software Requirements to Architectures (STRAW'2001), pages 22-30, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2001. ACM.
9. D. Luckhalm and J. Vera. An event-based architectural description language. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(9):717-734, Sept. 1995.
10. N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1):70-93, Jan. 2000.
11. M. Moriconi, X. Qian, and R. Riemenschneider. Correct architecture refinement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 21(4):356-372, Apr. 1995.
12. J. Mylopoulos, L. Chung, S. Liao, H. Wang, and E. Yu. Exploring alternatives during requirements analysis. IEEE Software, 18(1):92-96, Jan. 2001.
13. SINA. TRESE project. http://trese.cs.utwente.nl/sina/.