Comparison of stormwater biofiltration systems in Southeast Australia and Southern California

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 131-146

  Ambrose, Richard F ^a   Winfrey, Brandon K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943417782     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20491948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/WAT2.1064     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc 2005, 24:706–723.
2. Burns MJ, Fletcher TD, Walsh CJ, Ladson AR, Hatt BE. Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landsc Urban Plan 2012, 105:230–240.
3. Roy A, Wenger S, Fletcher T, Walsh C, Ladson A, Shuster W, Thurston H, Brown R. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ Manage 2008, 42:344–359.
4. Grant SB, Fletcher TD, Feldman D, Saphores J-D, Cook PLM, Stewardson M, Low K, Burry K, Hamilton AJ. Adapting urban water systems to a changing climate: lessons from the millennium drought in Southeast Australia. Environ Sci Technol 2013, 47:10727–10734.
5. Taylor GD, Fletcher TD, Wong THF, Breen PF, Duncan HP. Nitrogen composition in urban runoff— implications for stormwater management. Water Res 2005, 39:1982–1989.
6. Brown RR, Clarke JM. Transition to Water Sensitive Urban Design: The Story of Melbourne, Australia. Melbourne: Facility for Advancing Water Biofiltration, Monash University; 2007.
7. Dorsey JH. Improving water quality through California’s Clean Beach Initiative: an assessment of 17 projects. Environ Monit Assess 2010, 166:95–111.
8. Belden E, Antos M, Morris K, Steele NLC. Sustainable infrastructure: the Elmer Avenue Neighborhood Retrofit. Urban Coast 2012, 3:92–100.
9. Bureau of Meteorology. Climate data online—daily rainfall. Available at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/(Accessed August 9, 2014).
10. Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC). Summary of day data lister (SOD-TD3200). Available at: http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca5115 (Accessed August 9, 2014).
11. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A. Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. JHydrol2009, 365:310–321.
12. Blecken G-T, Zinger Y, Deletić A, Fletcher TD, Viklander M. Influence of intermittent wetting and drying conditions on heavy metal removal by stormwater biofilters. Water Res 2009, 43:4590–4598.
13. Zhang K, Randelovic A, Page D, McCarthy DT, Deletic A. The validation of stormwater biofilters for micropollutant removal using in situ challenge tests. Ecol Eng 2014, 67:1–10.
14. Lau S-L, Khan E, Stenstrom MK. Catch basin inserts to reduce pollution from stormwater. Water Sci Technol 2001, 44:23–34.
15. Ackerman D, Weisberg S. Relationship between rainfall and beach bacterial concentrations on Santa Monica Bay beaches. J Water Health 2003, 1:85–89.
16. Stein ED, Ackerman D. Dry weather water quality loadings in Arid, urban watersheds of the Los Angeles Basin, California, USA1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2007, 43:398–413.
17. Han Y, Lau S, Kayhanian M, Stenstrom M. Correlation analysis among highway stormwater pollutants and characteristics. Water Sci Technol 2006, 53:235–243.
18. Duncan H. Urban Stormwater Quality: A Statistical Overview. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology: Clayton, VIC; 1999.
19. McCarthy DT, Deletic A, Mitchell VG, Fletcher TD, Diaper C. Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels. Water Res 2008, 42:1812–1824.
20. Bratieres K, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Zinger Y. Nutrient and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large-scale design optimisation study. Water Res 2008, 42:3930–3940.
21. County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Stormwater best management practice design and maintenance manual for publicly maintained storm drain systems. 2009. Available at: http://dpw. lacounty.gov/ldd/publications/Stormwater%20BMP% 20Design%20and%20Maintenance%20Manual.pdf (Accessed August 12, 2014).
22. City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works. Vegetated stormwater curb extension standard plan S-484-0. 2010. Available at: http://eng.lacity. org/techdocs/stdplans/s-400/s-484-0.pdf (Accessed August 12, 2014).
23. Water M. Water Sensitive Urban Design Engineering Procedures: Stormwater. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing; 2005.
24. Kim H, Seagren EA, Davis AP. Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff. Water Environ Res 2003, 75:355–367.
25. Gilchrist S, Borst M, Stander EK. Factorial study of rain garden design for nitrogen removal. J Irrigat Drain Eng 2014, 04013016-1–11.
26. Zinger Y, Blecken G-T, Fletcher TD, Viklander M, Deletić A. Optimising nitrogen removal in existing stormwater biofilters: benefits and tradeoffs of a retrofitted saturated zone. Ecol Eng 2013, 51:75–82.
27. Payne EG, Pham T, Cook PL, Fletcher TD, Hatt BE, Deletic A. Biofilter design for effective nitrogen removal from stormwater—influence of plant species, inflow hydrology and use of a saturated zone. Water Sci Technol 2014, 69:1312–1319.
28. Blecken G-T, Zinger Y, Deletić A, Fletcher TD, Viklander M. Impact of a submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters. Ecol Eng 2009, 35:769–778.
29. Read J, Fletcher TD, Wevill T, Deletic A. Plant traits that enhance pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Int J Phytoremediation 2009, 12:34–53.
30. Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A. Hydraulic and pollutant removal performance of fine media stormwater filtration systems. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42: 2535–2541.
31. Hurley SE, Forman RTT. Stormwater ponds and biofilters for large urban sites: modeled arrangements that achieve the phosphorus reduction target for Boston’s Charles River, USA. Ecol Eng 2011, 37:850–863.
32. Le Coustumer S, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S, Lewis JF. Hydraulic performance of biofilter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation. JHydrol2009, 376:16–23.
33. Deletic A, Fletcher TD. Performance of grass filters usefor stormwater treatment—a field and modelling study JHydrol2006, 317:261–275.
34. Glaister BJ, Cook PLM, Fletcher TD, Hatt BE. Long-term phosphorus accumulation in stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. In: Water Sensitive Urban Design 2013: WSUD 2013, Engineers Australia, Barton, ACT, 2013.
35. Brown RA, Birgand F, Hunt WF. Analysis of consecutive events for nutrient and sediment treatment in field-monitored bioretention cells. Water Air Soil Pollut 2013, 224:1–14.
36. Hathaway J, Hunt W, Graves A, Wright J. Field evaluation of bioretention indicator bacteria sequestration in Wilmington, North Carolina. J Environ Eng 2011, 137:1103–1113.
37. Hunt W, Jarrett A, Smith J, Sharkey L. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J Irrigat Drain Eng 2006, 132:600–608.
38. Hunt W, Smith J, Jadlocki S, Hathaway J, Eubanks P. Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in Urban Charlotte, N.C. J Environ Eng 2008, 134:403–408.
39. Passeport E, Hunt W, Line D, Smith R, Brown R. Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution. J Irrigat Drain Eng 2009, 135:505–510.
40. Wardynski B, Hunt W. Are bioretention cells being installed per design standards in North Carolina? A field study. J Environ Eng 2012, 138:1210–1217.
41. Davis AP. Field performance of bioretention: water quality. Environ Eng Sci 2007, 24:1048–1064.
42. Davis A. Field performance of bioretention: hydrology impacts. JHydrolEng2008, 13:90–95.
43. DiBlasi CJ, Li H, Davis AP, Ghosh U. Removal and fate of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollutants in an urban stormwater bioretention facility. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:494–502.
44. Li H, Davis A. Urban particle capture in bioretention media, I: laboratory and field studies. J Environ Eng 2008, 134:409–418.
45. Henderson C, Greenway M, Phillips I. Removal of dissolved nitrogen, phosphorus and carbon from stormwater by biofiltration mesocosms. Water Sci Technol 2007, 55:183–191.
46. Barrett M, Limouzin M, Lawler D. Effects of media and plant selection on biofiltration performance. J Environ Eng 2013, 139:462–470.
47. Payne EGI, Fletcher TD, Russell DG, Grace MR, Cavagnaro TR, Evrard V, Deletic A, Hatt BE, Cook PLM. Temporary storage or permanent removal? The division of nitrogen between biotic assimilation and denitrification in stormwater biofiltration systems. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e90890.
48. Le Coustumer S, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S, Poelsma P. The influence of design parameters on clogging of stormwater biofilters: a large-scale column study. Water Res 2012, 46:6743–6752.
49. Ault TR, Cole JE, Overpeck JT, Pederson GT, Meko DM. Assessing the risk of persistent drought using climate model simulations and paleoclimate data. J Climate 2014, 27:7529–7549.
50. Houdeshel C, Pomeroy C. Plant selection for bioretention in the Arid West. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Low Impact Development Conference,American Society of Civil Engineers, San Francisco, CA 2010, 1475–1485.
51. Houdeshel CD, Pomeroy CA, Hultine KR. Bioretention design for xeric climates based on ecological principles 1. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2012, 48:1178–1190.
52. Stebbins GL, Major J. Endemism and speciation in the California Flora. Ecol Monogr 1965, 35:1–35.
53. Royal Botanic Gardens Melbourne, The Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology. Biodiversity of Metropolitan Melbourne. Victorian Environmental Assessment Council: Melbourne, VIC; 2009.
54. Nogaro G, Mermillod-Blondin F. Stormwater sediment and bioturbation influences on hydraulic functioning, biogeochemical processes, and pollutant dynamics in laboratory infiltration systems. Environmental science and technology 2009, 43:3632–3638.
55. Horn MA, Mertel R, Gehre M, Kastner M, Drake HL. In vivo emission of dinitrogen by earthworms via denitrifying bacteria in the gut. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2006, 72:1013–1018.
56. Levin LA, Mehring AS. Optimization of bioretention systems through application of ecological theory. WIREs Water. In press.
57. Payne EGI, Fletcher TD, Cook PLM, Deletic A, Hatt BE. Processes and drivers of nitrogen removal in stormwater biofiltration. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2014, 44:796–846.
58. Chen X, Peltier E, Sturm BSM, Young CB. Nitrogen removal and nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria quantification in a stormwater bioretention system Water Res 2013, 47:1691–1700.
59. Kazemi F, Beecham S, Gibbs J. Streetscape biodiversity and the role of bioretention swales in an Australian urban environment. Landsc Urban Plan 2011, 101:139–148.
60. Kazemi F, Beecham S, Gibbs J. Streetscale bioretention basins in Melbourne and their effect on local biodiversity. Ecol Eng 2009, 35:1454–1465.
61. Kazemi F, Beecham S, Gibbs J, Clay R. Factors affecting terrestrial invertebrate diversity in bioretention basins in an Australian urban environment. Landsc Urban Plan 2009, 92:304–313.
62. Pataki DE, Carreiro MM, Cherrier J, Grulke NE, Jennings V, Pincetl S, Pouyat RV, Whitlow TH, Zip-perer WC. Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions. Front Ecol Environ 2011, 9: 27–36.
63. Bouwer H. Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeol J 2002, 10: 121–142.