메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1803-1807

The preclinical data forum network: A new ECNP initiative to improve data quality and robustness for (preclinical) neuroscience

Author keywords

Neuroscience; Pre clinical; Quality assurance; Relevance; Reproducibility; Robustness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA QUALITY; DATA SHARING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NEUROSCIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH PRIORITY; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; ANIMAL; EUROPE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRECLINICAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY; PUBLICATION;

EID: 84943360362     PISSN: 0924977X     EISSN: 18737862     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.05.011     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (17)

References (31)
  • 1
    • 84892374338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biomarkers in pharmacology and drug discovery
    • Anderson D.C., Kodukula K. Biomarkers in pharmacology and drug discovery. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 87:172-188.
    • (2014) Biochem. Pharmacol. , vol.87 , pp. 172-188
    • Anderson, D.C.1    Kodukula, K.2
  • 2
    • 79953282225 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments
    • ARRIVE guidelines Animal research: reporting in vivo experiments. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metabol. 2011, 31:991-993.
    • (2011) J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metabol. , vol.31 , pp. 991-993
  • 3
    • 84859169880 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research
    • Begley C.G., Ellis L.M. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 2012, 483:531-533.
    • (2012) Nature , vol.483 , pp. 531-533
    • Begley, C.G.1    Ellis, L.M.2
  • 6
    • 67649649676 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
    • Chalmers I., Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 2009, 374:86-89.
    • (2009) Lancet , vol.374 , pp. 86-89
    • Chalmers, I.1    Glasziou, P.2
  • 8
    • 84925559156 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • When mice mislead
    • Couzin-Frankel J. When mice mislead. Science 2013, 342:922-925.
    • (2013) Science , vol.342 , pp. 922-925
    • Couzin-Frankel, J.1
  • 9
    • 84927130209 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Drug discoverers chart path to tackling data irreproducibility
    • Dolgin E. Drug discoverers chart path to tackling data irreproducibility. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13:875-876.
    • (2014) Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. , vol.13 , pp. 875-876
    • Dolgin, E.1
  • 10
    • 66849084202 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data
    • Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLos One 2009, 4:e5738.
    • (2009) PLos One , vol.4 , pp. e5738
    • Fanelli, D.1
  • 11
    • 84907224761 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer
    • Franco A., Malhotra N., Simonovits G. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer. Science 2014, 345:1502-1505.
    • (2014) Science , vol.345 , pp. 1502-1505
    • Franco, A.1    Malhotra, N.2    Simonovits, G.3
  • 13
    • 76149104306 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • BMJ policy on data sharing
    • Groves T. BMJ policy on data sharing. Br. Med. J. 2010, 340:c564.
    • (2010) Br. Med. J. , vol.340 , pp. c564
    • Groves, T.1
  • 14
    • 33846563409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why most published research findings are false
    • Ioannidis J.P.A. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Med. 2005, 2:e124.
    • (2005) PLOS Med. , vol.2 , pp. e124
    • Ioannidis, J.P.A.1
  • 15
    • 84908350439 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to make more published research true
    • Ioannidis J.P.A. How to make more published research true. PLOS Med. 2014, 11:e1001747.
    • (2014) PLOS Med. , vol.11 , pp. e1001747
    • Ioannidis, J.P.A.1
  • 16
    • 84885038767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Neurolex.org: an online framework for neuroscience knowledge
    • Larson S.D., Martone M.E. Neurolex.org: an online framework for neuroscience knowledge. Front. Neuroinform. 2013, 7:18.
    • (2013) Front. Neuroinform. , vol.7 , pp. 18
    • Larson, S.D.1    Martone, M.E.2
  • 19
    • 84909979289 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Journals unite for reproducibility
    • McNutt M. Journals unite for reproducibility. Science 2014, 346:678.
    • (2014) Science , vol.346 , pp. 678
    • McNutt, M.1
  • 20
    • 84877752060 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A survey on data reproducibility in cancer research provides insights into our limited ability to translate findings from the laboratory to the clinic
    • Mobley A., Linder S.K., Braeuer R., Ellis L.M., Zwelling L. A survey on data reproducibility in cancer research provides insights into our limited ability to translate findings from the laboratory to the clinic. PLoS One 2013, 8:e63221.
    • (2013) PLoS One , vol.8 , pp. e63221
    • Mobley, A.1    Linder, S.K.2    Braeuer, R.3    Ellis, L.M.4    Zwelling, L.5
  • 21
  • 22
    • 84921938478 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics
    • Motulsky H.J. Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics. Naunys Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 2014, 387:1017-1023.
    • (2014) Naunys Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. , vol.387 , pp. 1017-1023
    • Motulsky, H.J.1
  • 25
    • 84897425769 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Make mouse studies work
    • Perrin S. Make mouse studies work. Nature 2014, 507:423-425.
    • (2014) Nature , vol.507 , pp. 423-425
    • Perrin, S.1
  • 26
    • 80055088241 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
    • Prinz F., Schlange T., Asadullah K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10:712.
    • (2011) Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. , vol.10 , pp. 712
    • Prinz, F.1    Schlange, T.2    Asadullah, K.3
  • 27
    • 84926450571 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preclinical data reproducibility for R&D-the challenge for neuroscience
    • Steckler T. Preclinical data reproducibility for R&D-the challenge for neuroscience. Psychopharmacology 2015, 232:317-320.
    • (2015) Psychopharmacology , vol.232 , pp. 317-320
    • Steckler, T.1
  • 28
    • 84912105043 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rigor or mortis: best practices for preclinical research in neuroscience
    • Steward O., Balice-Gordon R. Rigor or mortis: best practices for preclinical research in neuroscience. Neuron 2014, 84:572-581.
    • (2014) Neuron , vol.84 , pp. 572-581
    • Steward, O.1    Balice-Gordon, R.2
  • 31
    • 84885167885 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature
    • Vasilevsky N.A., Brush M.H., Paddock H., Ponting L., Tripathy S.J., LaRocca G.M., Haendel M.A. On the reproducibility of science: unique identification of research resources in the biomedical literature. PeerJ 2013, 1:e148.
    • (2013) PeerJ , vol.1 , pp. e148
    • Vasilevsky, N.A.1    Brush, M.H.2    Paddock, H.3    Ponting, L.4    Tripathy, S.J.5    LaRocca, G.M.6    Haendel, M.A.7


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.