Does sperm origin affect embryo morphokinetic parameters?

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1325-1332

  Lammers, Jenna ^a,b   Reignier, Arnaud ^a,b,d   Splingart, Carole ^a,b   Catteau, Aurore ^a   David, Laurent ^a,b,c,d   Barriere, Paul ^a,b,d   Freour, Thomas ^a,b,d,e  

^a NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique   (France)

^c Recombinant Protein Production Facility Federative Research Structure François Bonamy   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^e Clinica EUGIN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Azoospermia; ICSI; Morphokinetic; Surgically retrieved sperm; Time lapse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; EJACULATION; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORULA; OOCYTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVARIAN RESERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM RETRIEVAL; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; INFERTILITY; MAMMALIAN EMBRYO; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; SPERMATOZOON; SURGERY; TESTIS; TIME LAPSE IMAGING;

ADULT; EJACULATION; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MALE; OOCYTES; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPERM RETRIEVAL; SPERMATOZOA; TESTIS; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING;

EID: 84943351203     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0517-z     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:366.
2. Bromage SJ, Falconer DA, Lieberman BA, Sangar V, Payne SR. Sperm retrieval rates in subgroups of primary azoospermic males. Eur Urol. 2007;51:534–9.
3. Ben-Ami I, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Komarovsky D, Ron-El R, Friedler S. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome of ejaculated versus extracted testicular spermatozoa in cryptozoospermic men. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1867–71.
4. Desai N, AbdelHafez F, Sabanegh E, Goldfarb J. Paternal effect on genomic activation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate after ICSI with cryopreserved epididymal versus testicular spermatozoa. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:142.
5. Ishikawa T, Shiotani M, Izumi Y, Hashimoto H, Kokeguchi S, Goto S, et al. Fertilization and pregnancy using cryopreserved testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection with azoospermia. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:174–9.
6. Tsai CC, Huang FJ, Wang LJ, Lin YJ, Kung FT, Hsieh CH, et al. Clinical outcomes and development of children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using extracted testicular sperm or ejaculated extreme severe oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia sperm: a comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:567–71.
7. van Loendersloot L, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Bossuyt P, Repping S. Selection of embryos for transfer in IVF: ranking embryos based on their implantation potential using morphological scoring. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29:222–30.
8. Paternot G, Wetzels AM, Thonon F, Vansteenbrugge A, Willemen D, Devroe J, et al. Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:127.
9. Herrero J, Meseguer M. Selection of high potential embryos using time lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1030–4.
10. Sundvall L, Ingerslev HJ, Breth Knudsen U, Kirkegaard K. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:3215–21.
11. WHO. Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Fifthth ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
12. Cedrin-Durnerin I, Guivarc'h-Leveque A, Hugues JN. Pretreatment with estrogen does not affect IVF-ICSI cycle outcome compared with no pretreatment in GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1359–64.
13. Ciray HN, Campbell A, Agerholm IE, Aguilar J, Chamayou S, Esbert M, et al. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2650–60.
14. Hickman C, Lennon J, Cook C, Perez MJ, Mania A, Lavery S. Factors affecting morphokinetics: sperm origin, maternal age and polidy. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S6–7.
15. Chen AA, Tan L, Suraj V, Reijo Pera R, Shen S. Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1035–43.
16. Kaser DJ, Racowsky C. Clinical outcomes following selection of human preimplantation embryos with time-lapse monitoring: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:617–31.
17. Meseguer M, Herrero J, Tejera A, Hilligsoe KM, Ramsing NB, Remohi J. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2658–71.
18. Dal Canto M, Coticchio G, Mignini Renzini M, De Ponti E, Novara PV, Brambillasca F, et al. Cleavage kinetics analysis of human embryos predicts development to blastocyst and implantation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2012;25:474–80.
19. Fréour T, Le Fleuter N, Lammers J, Splingart C, Reignier A, Barrière P. External validation of a time-lapse prediction model. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:917–22.
20. Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U, Engstrom AB, Hellberg D. Single blastocyst transfer after ICSI from ejaculate spermatozoa, percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:167–71.
21. Braga DP, Setti AS, Vingris L, Figueira RC, Iaconelli A, Borges E. The male factor of infertility should not be an issue for the selection of patients for extended embryo culture programmes. Andrology. 2013;1:758–63.
22. Meseguer M, Rubio I, Cruz M, Basile N, Marcos J, Requena A. Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1481–9.
23. Oron G, Fisch B, Sapir O, Wertheimer A, Garor R, Feldberg D, et al. Pregnancy outcome after ICSI with thawed testicular sperm from men with non-obstructive azoospermia compared to ICSI with ejaculated sperm from men with severe oligoasthenoteratozoospermia and IVF with normal ejaculated sperm. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30:103–6.
24. Xie D, Qiu Z, Luo C, Chu Q, Quan S. Effect of spermatozoa from different sources on normal fertilization of oocytes and embryo quality and development in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014;34:857–61.
25. Amirjannati N, Heidari-Vala H, Akhondi MA, Hosseini Jadda SH, Kamali K, Sadeghi MR. Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes between spermatozoa retrieved from testicular biopsy and from ejaculation in cryptozoospermic men. Andrologia. 2012;44 Suppl 1:704–9.
26. Bendikson KA, Neri QV, Takeuchi T, Toschi M, Schlegel PN, Rosenwaks Z, et al. The outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using occasional spermatozoa in the ejaculate of men with spermatogenic failure. J Urol. 2008;180:1060–4.
27. Fedder J, Loft A, Parner ET, Rasmussen S, Pinborg A. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm: a controlled national cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:230–40.