Protobacco media exposure and youth susceptibility to smoking cigarettes, cigarette experimentation, and current tobacco use among US youth

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Fulmer, Erika B ^a   Neilands, Torsten B ^b   Dube, Shanta R ^c   Kuiper, Nicole M ^a   Arrazola, Rene A ^a   Glantz, Stanton A ^d  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIGARETTE SMOKE;

ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT; HISPANIC; HUMAN; INTERNET; JUVENILE; MALE; PEER GROUP; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING; SOCIAL MEDIA; TELEVISION VIEWING; TOBACCO USE; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; MASS MEDIUM; PEER PRESSURE; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; PEER INFLUENCE; SCHOOLS; SMOKING; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84943340051     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134734     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking-50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. How tobacco smoke causes disease: The biology and behavioral basis for smoking attributable disease: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2010.
3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012.
4. Arrazola RA, Dube SR, King BA. Tobacco product use among middle and high school students-United States, 2011 and 2012. MMWR. 2013; 62(45): 893-897. PMID: 24226625
5. National Cancer Institute. The role of media in promoting and reducing tobacco use. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 19. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2008. NIH Publication No. 07-6242.
6. Wills TA, Sargent JD, Stoolmiller M, Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Movie smoking exposure and smoking onset: a longitudinal study of mediation processes in a representative sample of U.S. adolescents. Psychol Addict. 2008; 22(2): 269-77. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.269
7. Wills TA, Sargent JD, Stoolmiller M, Gibbons FX, Worth KA, Dal CS. Movie exposure to smoking cues and adolescent smoking onset: a test for mediation through peer affiliations. Health Psychol. 2007; 26 (6): 769-776. PMID: 18020850
8. Ling PM, Neilands TB, Glantz SA. Young adult smoking behavior: a national survey. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 36(5): 389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.028 PMID: 19269128
9. Charlesworth A, Glantz SA. Smoking in the movies increases adolescent smoking: a review. Pediatrics. 2005; 116(6): 1516-1528. PMID: 16322180
10. Sargent JD, Hanewinkel R. Comparing the effects of entertainment media and tobacco marketing on youth smoking in Germany. Addiction. 2009; 104(5): 8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02542.x
11. Sargent JD, Dalton MA, Beach ML, Mott LA, Tickle JJ, Ahrens MB, et al. Viewing tobacco use in movies: does it shape attitudes that mediate adolescent smoking? Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22(3): 137-145. PMID: 11897456
12. Dal CS, Stoolmiller M, Sargent JD. When movies matter: exposure to smoking in movies and changes in smoking behavior. J Health Commun. 2012; 17(1): 76-89. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.585697PMID: 22085232
13. Lyons A, McNeill A, Britton J. Tobacco imagery on prime time UK television. Tob Control. 2013; 23(3): 257-263. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050650 PMID: 23479113
14. National Association of Attorneys General. Master Settlement Agreements; 2010. Available: http://www.naag.org/backpages/naag/tobacco/msa/msa-pdf/MSA%20with%20Sig%20Pages%20and%20Exhibits.pdf/file-view. Accessed Jan 7 2014.
15. U.S. v. Philip Morris. Sect. 449 F. 2006.
16. Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. The Verdict is in. The hazards of smoking. 2006.
17. Federal Trade Commission. Cigarette report for 2012. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2015.
18. Federal Trade Commission. Smokeless tobacco report for 2012. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2015.
19. Dube SR, Arrazola RA, Lee J, Engstrom M, Malarcher A. Pro-tobacco influences and susceptibility to smoking cigarettes among middle and high school students-United States, 2011. J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52(5 Suppl): S45-S51. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.007 PMID: 23601611
20. Kim AE, Loomis BR, Busey AH, Farrelly MC, Willett JG, Juster HR. Influence of retail cigarette advertising, price promotions, and retailer compliance on youth smoking-related attitudes and behaviors. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013; 19(6): E1-E9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182980c47 PMID: 23715218
21. Henriksen L, Schleicher NC, Feighery EC, Fortmann SP. A longitudinal study of exposure to retail cigarette advertising and smoking initiation. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(2): 232-238. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3021 PMID: 20643725
22. Morgenstern M, Sargent JD, Isensee B, Hanewinkel R. From never to daily smoking in 30 months: the predictive value of tobacco and non-tobacco advertising exposure. BMJ Open. 2013; 3(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002907
23. Agaku IT, King BA, Dube SR. Trends in exposure to pro-tobacco advertisements over the Internet, in newspapers/magazines, and at retail stores among U.S. middle and high school students, 2000-2012. Prev Med. 2014; 58: 45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.012 PMID: 24183778
24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS); 2015. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data-statistics/surveys/nyts/. Accessed 6 June 2015.
25. Starr G, Rogers T, Schooley M, Porter S, Wiesen E, Jamison N. Key outcome indicators for evaluating comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005.
26. Pierce JP, Choi WS, Gilpin EA, Farkas AJ, Merritt RK. Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. Health Psychol. 1996; 15(5): 6.
27. Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
28. Loehlin JC. Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1998.
29. Rhemtulla M, Brusseau-Liard PE, Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17:19. doi: 10.1037/a0029315
30. Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004; 9(4): 466-491. PMID: 15598100
31. Bentler PM, Bonnett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980; 88: 588-606.
32. Browne MW, Cudek R. Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993: pp. 136-162.
33. Yu CY. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.
34. Hu L-t, Bentler OM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling. 1999; 6:1-55.
35. Glantz SA, Iaccopucci A, Titus K, Polansky JR. Smoking in top-grossing US movies, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012; 9: 120170. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.120170 PMID: 23017248
36. Polansky JP, Titus K, Lanning N, Glantz SA. Smoking in top-grossing U.S. movie; 2012. University of California, San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3j69r912#page-1. Accessed 25 March 2013.
37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact Sheet: Smoking in the Movies; 2013. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data-statistics/fact-sheets/youth-data/movies/index.htm. Accessed November 14 2013.
38. Song AV, Ling PM, Neilands TB, Glantz SA. Smoking in movies and increased smoking among young adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 33(5): 396-403. PMID: 17950405
39. Sargent JD, Worth KA, Beach M, Gerrard M, Heatherton TF. Population-based assessment of exposure to risk behaviors in motion pictures. Commun Methods Meas. 2008; 2(1-2): 134-151. PMID: 19122801
40. Sargent JD, Gibson J, Heatherton TF. Comparing the effects of ntertainment media and tobacco marketing on youth smoking. Tob Control. 2009; 18(1): 47-53. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026153 PMID: 18948391