The in-between machine: The unique value proposition of a robot or why we are modelling the wrong things

ICAART 2015 - 7th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 464-469

  Hoorn, Johan F ^a   Konijn, Elly A ^a   Germans, Desmond M ^b   Burger, Sander ^c   Munneke, Annemiek ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Germans Media Technology and Services   (Netherlands)

^c KeyDocs   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Human care; Interaction design; Loneliness; Modelling; Social robotics

Indexed keywords

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; MODELS; MOTION PICTURES; ROBOTICS;

DOCUMENTARY FILMS; HUMAN CARE; INTERACTION DESIGN; LONELINESS; MACHINE PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL ROBOTICS; UNIQUE VALUE PROPOSITIONS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84943250795     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5220/0005251304640469     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Burger, S., 2015. Alice cares, KeyDocs - NCRV. Amsterdam.
2. De Jager, J., Grijzenhout, A., 2014. In Zora's company, Dit is de Dag. EO: NPO 2. Hilversum. Available at: http://www.npo.nl/artikelen/dit-is-de-dag-geeftbejaarden-zorgrobot.
3. Fingerman, K. L., 2009. Consequential strangers and peripheral partners: The importance of unimportant relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1(2), 69-82. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009. 00010.x.
4. Hoorn, J. F., 2014. Creative confluence, John Benjamins. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA.
5. Hoorn, J. F., 2012. Epistemics of the virtual, John Benjamins. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Hoorn, J. F., Konijn, E. A., Van der Veer, G. C., 2003. Virtual reality: Do not augment realism, augment relevance. Upgrade - Human-Computer Interaction: Overcoming Barriers, 4(1), 18-26.
7. Hoorn, J. F., Pontier, M. A., Siddiqui, G. F., 2012. Coppélius' concoction: Similarity and complementarity among three affect-related agent models. Cognitive Systems Research, 15-16, 33-49. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2011.04.001.
8. Killeen, C., 1998. Loneliness: an epidemic in modern society. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(4), 762-770.
9. Kim, E. S., Berkovits, L. D., Bernier, E. P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., Scassellati, B., 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 43(5), 1038-1049.
10. Konijn, E. A., 2013. The role of emotion in media use and effects. In Dill, K. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology (pp. 186-211). Oxford University Press, New York/London.
11. Konijn, E. A., Walma van der Molen, J. H., Van Nes, S., 2009. Emotions bias perceptions of realism in audiovisual media. Why we may take fiction for real. Discourse Processes, 46, 309-340.
12. Llargues Asensio, J. M., Peralta, J., Arrabales, R., Gonzalez Bedia, M., Cortez, P., Lopez Peña, A., 2014. Artificial Intelligence approaches for the generation and assessment of believable human-like behaviour in virtual characters. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(16), 7281-7290.
13. Mori, M., 1970. The uncanny valley, Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
14. Pontier, M. A., Hoorn, J. F. 2012. Toward machines that behave ethically better than humans do. In N. Miyake, B. Peebles, and R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th International Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci'12, 2012, Sapporo, Japan (pp. 2198-2203). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
15. Rubin, Z., 1975. Disclosing oneself to a stranger: Reciprocity and its limits. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(3), 233-260. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031 (75) 80025-4.
16. Van Kemenade, M. A. M., et al., in prep. Moral concerns of caregivers about the use of three types of robots in healthcare.