DMSumm: Review and assessment

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 2389, Issue , 2002, Pages 263-273

  Pardo, Thiago Alexandre Salgueiro ^a   Rino, Lucia Helena Machado ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

DISCOURSE MODEL;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84943249015     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45433-0_36     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Feltrim, V.D.; Nunes, M.G.V.; Aluísio, S.M. (2001). Um corpus de textos científicos em português para a análise da estrutura esquemática. Série de Relatórios Técnicos do NILC, NILC-TR-01-4. São Carlos SP. Brazil.
2. Grosz, B. and Sidner, C. (1986). Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 12, No. 3.
3. Hobbs, J.R. (1985). On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Tech. Rep. CSLI-85-37, Center for Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
4. Hoey, M. (1983). On the Surface of Discourse. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
5. Jordan, M.P. (1980). Short Texts to Explain Problem-Solution Structures . and Vice Versa. Instructional Science, Vol. 9, pp. 221-252.
6. Jordan, M. P. (1992). An Integrated Three-Pronged Análisis of a Fund-Raising Letter. In W. C. Mann and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, pp. 171-226. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
7. Jordan, M, P. (2000). A Pragmatic/Structural Approach to Relevance. Technostyle, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 47- 67.
8. Mani, I. (2001). Automatic Summarization. John Benjamins Publishing Co., Amsterdam.
9. Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A. (1987). Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization. Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190.
10. Marcu, D. (1997). The Rhetorical Parsing, Summarization, and Generation of Natural Language Texts. PhD. Thesis. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada.
11. Martins, T.B.F.; Ghiraldelo, C.M.; Nunes, M.G.V.; Oliveira Jr., O.N. (1996). Readability Formulas Applied to Textbooks in Brazilian Portuguese. Notas do ICMSC-USP, Série Computação. São Carlos SP, Brazil.
12. Maybury, M.T. (1992). Communicative Acts for Explanation Generation. Int. Journal of Man-Machine Studies 37, pp. 135-172.
13. Moore, J.D. and Paris, C. (1993). Plannig Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional and Rhetorical Information. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 651-694.
14. Paice, C. D. (1981). The automatic generation of literature abstracts: An approach based on the identification of self-indicating phrases. Information Retrieval Research. Butterworth & Co.
15. Pardo, T.A.S. and Rino, L.H.M. (2001). A summary planner based on a three-level discourse model. In the Proc. of the 6th NLPRS Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium, pp. 533-538. National Center of Science, Tokyo, Japan. 27?29 November.
16. Rino, L.H.M. (1996a). Modelagem de Discurso para o Tratamento da Concisão e Preservação da Idéia Central na Geração de Textos. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.
17. Rino, L.H.M. (1996b). A sumarização automática de textos em português. In Anais do II Encontro para o Processamento Computacional de Português Escrito e Falado, pp. 109-119. Curitiba - PR. Outubro.
18. Rino, L.H.M. and Scott, D. (1994). Automatic generation of draft summaries: Heuristics for content selection. ITRI Tech. Report ITRI-94-8. University of Brighton, England.
19. Sparck Jones, K. and Galliers, J. R. (1996). Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1083.
20. White, J.; Doyon, J.; Talbott, S. (2000).Task tolerance of MT output in Integrated Text Processes. In the Proc. of the Embedded MT Systems Workshop, pp. 9-16 (NAACL-ANLP 2000 Workshop). Seattle, WA.
21. Winter, E.O. (1977). A Clause-Relational Approach to English Texts: A Study of Some Predictive Lexical Items in Written Discourse. Instructional Science, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-92.